Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans brace for glorious victory over Obamacare
Washington Post ^ | May 15, 2015 | By Greg Sargent

Posted on 05/16/2015 10:59:44 AM PDT by Jim Robinson

Nancy Pelosi is now predicting that Republicans will “rue the day” that the Supreme Court guts Obamacare subsidies for millions in three dozen states. “They’re going to then go out and say we’re going to take subsidies away from people who have health care? No, I don’t think so,” says Pelosi. “It would be really bad news for them.”

Meanwhile, if anything, Republicans may be moving away from their previously-stated vow to participate in providing a contingency fix to temporarily keep those millions covered. The Hill reports that GOP Rep. Tom Price, the chairman of the House budget committee and a leading conservative, has now come out against any plan to temporarily keep those subsidies going.

Price’s approach to the issue neatly foreshadows the chaos that could erupt if the Court does what Republicans say they want and sides with the challengers in King v. Burwell.

In coming out against a temporary subsidies fix, Price appears to be somewhat at odds with other Republicans, such as Rep. Paul Ryan and Senators like Ron Johnson, Orrin Hatch, and John Barrasso, who want to offer some kind of transitional plan for those who would lose subsidies, putting off the fallout until after the election and buying time for Republicans to produce a comprehensive Obamacare alternative.

Instead, Price wants to proceed straight to repealing Obamacare and replacing it with his new proposal. The simplified version of Price’s reforms is that it would do away with the individual mandate and the Medicaid expansion and the required minimum standards for health plans and the protections for people with preexisting conditions. It would subsidize people’s insurance, but it would replace the current subsidy system, which is based on income, with one based on age...

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; abortion; california; deathpanels; election2016; johnbarrasso; kingvburwell; kingversusburwell; medicaid; nancypelosi; obamacare; orrinhatch; paulryan; popefrancis; romancatholicism; ronjohnson; scotus; tedcruz; texas; tomprice; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Jim Robinson

When the time comes, Republicans will put forth a unified plan for the time being.

Obama will not dare veto it.

There are several plans under Republican consideration and they will be debated in the open.

The moonbats will whine and knash teeth but lose


21 posted on 05/16/2015 11:45:05 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc.;+12, 73, ..... No peace? then no peace!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

If SCOTUS kills Obamacare, Hillary will run on replacing it with - what else - the return of Hillarycare.

So Cruz not only has to come up with an interim support plan for those cut off while the free market is reinstated, he needs a catchy name for it to make the cud-chewers pause.

Something like “FreedomCare” with the tagline of “You Can Read It Before You Vote On It.”


22 posted on 05/16/2015 11:45:51 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
it would replace the current subsidy system, which is based on income, with one based on age... it would replace the current subsidy system, which is based on income, with one based on age...

If the government could stop paying subsidies and at the same time reduce taxes by the amount on money it saved in abolishing the ocare subsidy program,there would be a long run permanent benefit to everyone because the taxation of everyone's income would be smaller, and everyone would be enabled to buy more of the goods he himself desired.

If the subsidies are retained,insofar as the subsidized prices are above the costs of producing additional medical service by more than is necessary to provide the going rate of profit, the incentive is created to increase production. The incentive is created to increased production all the way to the point that any further increase would have to be carried out under conditions of such diminishing returns. To avoid these consequences,the government would be led to seek ways to limit the increase in production its policy of subsidies makes profitable.It would be another libtard perversity of result.

23 posted on 05/16/2015 11:50:19 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Some of the full weight of Obamacare will come down that year.

That's already happening as we speak. I've now heard from 4 different married friends and their insurance has increased in cost.. their deductible has doubled and they paid a FINE to the IRS of $2800 because EVEN THOUGH their insurance is, and was, just fine for their needs.. it DID NOT meet ALL of the REQUIRED Obamacare standards so they either had to switch to Obamacare or PAY a FINE to hold on to what they had at the time they filed their income tax. True!

"If you like your insurance you can keep your insurance" - repeated by Obama 209 separate times in speeches to believing Americans.

The chickens are ALREADY home and roosting and MANY, MANY MORE are on their way.

24 posted on 05/16/2015 11:55:22 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor

Man that sucks. Sorry to hear about your friends getting stung like that.

I wonder how many people obtained insurance and were shocked to find this same thing out.


25 posted on 05/16/2015 11:57:15 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

Are the republicans party to the suit? Have they filed an amicus brief? They need to neutralize the democrat attempt at framing the narrative that ‘the republicans did this’. They won’t, of course. The stupid party, indeed.


26 posted on 05/16/2015 11:59:34 AM PDT by pluvmantelo (My hope for America died 11-06-12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Get the IRS out of our health plans. There is NO privacy with IRS.


27 posted on 05/16/2015 12:00:14 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
That should be a PROFOUND TALKING POINT of the Republicans in the upcoming election.

Afterall, NOT a SINGLE Republican cast a YES vote at the original passage vote. It was voted in by the DEMOCRATS totally and completely.

With what's occurring SMART Republican leadership would would begin now POUNDING the DEMOCRATS into the ground on this issue alone with the VOTERS that matter.

28 posted on 05/16/2015 12:06:06 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Glorious victory? Isn’t that a typical communist phrase?


29 posted on 05/16/2015 12:14:07 PM PDT by Red_Devil 232 ((VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Someone throw some water on that witch....


30 posted on 05/16/2015 12:17:33 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor

I agree with you. We’ll both probably be scratching our heads when they don’t.


31 posted on 05/16/2015 12:45:45 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Conservatism: Now home to liars too. And we'll support them. Yea... GOPe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob
Imagine the chaos if people discover freedom.

Thanks to hussein's CommieCare, my premiums soared from $125 to $550 per month. Even worse, as a stockholder in an health insurance company, dividends have been slashed. And on top of that, communist health "care" is meddling in the market. Recall that CommieCare forced Blue Cross Blue Shield to adhere to a so-called "cost-control mandate", restricting companies to spend as they see fit.

Exterminate CommieCare and Medicare! Get the central government's grubby hands out of the free market. Restore America's healthcare to the unrivaled best on the planet as it was under President Reagan.


32 posted on 05/16/2015 1:09:53 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill
. . . at odds with other Republicans, such as Rep. Paul Ryan and Senators like Ron Johnson, Orrin Hatch, and John Barrasso

Ron Johnson beat 3-term incumbent Russ Feingold (D) on the wings of the Tea Party. Feingold as announced retake his seat in 2016.

33 posted on 05/16/2015 1:15:12 PM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I was going to say the exact same thing, but you already said it, so all I can say is MEGA DITTOS!

The #1 first thing they need to do is bring back catastrophic coverage, remove the mandate and make it possible to buy insurance across state lines, at that point if they want to reintroduce some kind of subsidy or tax credit I’d be ok with that.

I wouldn’t mind subsidizing people to have catastrophic coverage, if they got cancer or hit by a bus, but as for this “comprehensive” nonsense, that’s ridiculous.


34 posted on 05/16/2015 1:16:42 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Get rid of all this socialist malarkey including mandates, regulations, subsidies, government payments, tax credits, price fixing, etc, allow freedom and free markets to flourish and watch healthcare costs plummet.


35 posted on 05/16/2015 1:24:55 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
I wouldn’t mind subsidizing people to have catastrophic coverage...

And you are free to do via your church or private charities. But not one cent from taxes for any form of coverage, catastrophic or otherwise. America was built on choice and individual initiative not socialism in whatever manner it may appear. Let freedom ring as it did under President Reagan!


36 posted on 05/16/2015 1:24:58 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Revising and extending my remarks: Yes, allow policies over state lines and catastrophic policies instead of policies that cover each and every scratch, routine illness and office call and the price of healthcare will fall to the point that we can all afford to pay for office calls out of our own pockets. Free clinics and charitable hospitals can be established for the truly destitute.


37 posted on 05/16/2015 1:31:42 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
In hussein’s destructive economy, I've found that direct negotiating and bartering works very well. For example, rather than having costly dental insurance (which the regime has driven sky-high), I perform services for my dentist. Being skilled in IT, I assist with his computer network and perform routine maintenance on his server and workstations. This is my way of giving the middle finger to the illegal _resident and his cronies. My cost of dental care has been zero since 2010.

All it takes is a little creativity and good ol' American know-how to defeat the evil schemes of the regime.

38 posted on 05/16/2015 1:41:15 PM PDT by re_nortex (DP - that's what I like about Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

Repeal it. Every word, and most of the punctuation marks. :)


39 posted on 05/16/2015 2:17:39 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: re_nortex

re: adhere to a so-called “cost-control mandate”

CMS is now the control. CMS sets the standard for Medicare and Medicaid. Insurance companies are forced to peg their business to CMS mandates. CMS sends massive amounts of money to develop software, to do all kinds of special projects. The software developers must all comply with CMS.

Doctors, Hospitals and all providers now see CMS as the customer. Their customer is king. Providers do what CMS tells them is billable. No longer do providers see the patient as the customer. No longer is the care customer oriented. It is now CMS billable oriented.


40 posted on 05/16/2015 3:19:43 PM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson