i’ll make point A, B, C, D, E
I’ll hafta do it piece.
A. “All show” ... “This was nothing more than a symbolic act.” If someone argues that this is ineffective because it will fail in the Senate or faces a veto, they should say so. But it is false to call it “symbolic”. The alternative is a bill with some real teeth, one that will fail to get out of committee or fail on the House floor. That wouldn’t be “symbolic”? Ok, bills that pass are symbolic because they cannot become law ... bills that fail are not symbolic .... back to drawing board with that concept. Right-to-Lifers cannot support legislation unless they are assured that it will become law? When did anyone agree to that?
I never said that. You’re twisting.