Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: campaignPete R-CT

I never said that. You’re twisting.


59 posted on 05/16/2015 8:11:19 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance; 1010RD; Repeal 16-17; wagglebee; Nextrush; Yogafist; AuH2ORepublican; ...

A.
#53 doesn’t mention you.
see #5
see #16

B. A sound argument would be that it would be better to promote a bill with real teeth, even if it fails in committee, even if you cannot force a vote in committee.
-A Discharge Petition could be started.
-a stronger advocate than Rep. Trent Franks should be sought to captain legislation.
There are pros and cons to that argument. I’m on the pro side for stronger advocates.

C. One could argue that these bills belong in state legislatures, away from the corrupting national interests ... that 50 states allow for a variety of proposals and better opportunities for both failed attempts and successful ones.

I haven’t gotten to D or E


60 posted on 05/16/2015 11:47:04 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT (-Connecticut Republicanism is a mental disorder. - Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson