Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: What is the politics behind the failure of the Pacific Free Trade Agreement?
Free Republic ^ | May 13, 2015 | Piranha

Posted on 05/13/2015 8:08:13 AM PDT by Piranha

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: Piranha
At least one Freeper has stated that this treaty will allow almost unlimited H1-B work visas for Asian scientists and engineers who want to work in the USA.

I have only read a summary of the Treaty, so I can't confirm that.

But, like the poster Piranha, my first thought was, “Why would Obama suddenly want an Asian free trade agreement?”

21 posted on 05/13/2015 8:59:07 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

1. It outsources jobs to Asia and as part of the deal, it might include amnesty. Unfortunately the rot is so severe that essentially any bill that can be used will be used to push through amnesty.

2. It was a show vote, purely for propaganda. Both factions want a PFTA. The more it screws the middle class, the better. Wait a week or two and a “compromise” will be found.

3. You’re operating from a mistaken premise that there is even one scintilla of difference between the two factions. They both want the same thing: power and control. If they can further open the borders and destroy the existing middle class in the process, then all the better from their perspective.


22 posted on 05/13/2015 9:00:37 AM PDT by RKBA Democrat (The ballot is a suggestion box for slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

The Deenocrats want $$ for they’re votes. Republicans want MORE $$ for theirs.


23 posted on 05/13/2015 9:01:54 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

It also has SOPA on steroids in it.

Perhaps the small arms treaty, too.

There’s an addition Dems want on medical practices/devices.

0bama wants something for Kenya in it.


24 posted on 05/13/2015 9:03:21 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

yes it’s all about money for them think kick backs nothing in D.C. moves unless it’s tide to money or power.


25 posted on 05/13/2015 9:15:50 AM PDT by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piranha
1. Why is the Pacific Free Trade Agreement such a high priority for Obama's Second Term?

It's high on the bucket list of George Soros, Warren Buffett, and other key puppetmasters and key financial contributors. Presidential libraries and retirement homes in Maui don't grow on trees, you know.

2. Why did so many Democrats oppose Obama on this bill?

Because most Democrats, elected or otherwise, oppose Obama on this bill. It is anathema to the unions, many of their rank-and-file, and anyone who thinks low wages and income inequality is an issue (which is most of their base). Plus I think they sense this is the moment where Obama's sun is setting and Liz Warren's is rising.

3. Why did so many Republicans support Obama on this bill?

Because most of them have drank the Chamber of Commerce Kool-Aid, or are 100% in their pockets. And most of their base opposes the treaty as well, meaning the GOPe has to make a big public show of strolling up and shoving a middle finger into their faces.


26 posted on 05/13/2015 9:53:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Piranha; Alamo-Girl; marron; xzins; hosepipe; YHAOS
Why did so many Republicans support Obama on this bill?

Perhaps because, from a geostrategic perspective, this trade agreement would bring the covered nations of southeast Asia into closer ties with the American sphere of influence, and away from the would-be hegemon, the increasingly aggressive China.

The Democrats hate this treaty, because organized Labor hates this treaty.

Just some thoughts....

27 posted on 05/13/2015 10:01:01 AM PDT by betty boop (Science deserves all the love we can give it, but that love should not be blind. — NR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Piranha; Alamo-Girl; marron; P-Marlowe; hosepipe; YHAOS

I’m not a doctrinaire republican about either China or labor unions except that I want security and I want a real free market.

Republicans don’t care about those things anymore, witness the Iran Senate bill, open amnesty, and cronyism.

So, republicans support Obama on this because on this their boss(es) want(s) this direction.


28 posted on 05/13/2015 10:52:53 AM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

The love of Money in all it’s forms; is at the ROOT of all Obamanoiacs...


29 posted on 05/13/2015 10:54:05 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Piranha

Important point: the agreement has not failed. The vote was whether to put in on the so-called fast track.


30 posted on 05/13/2015 11:10:10 AM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

put *it*


31 posted on 05/13/2015 11:11:55 AM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Perhaps because, from a geostrategic perspective, this trade agreement would bring the covered nations of southeast Asia into closer ties with the American sphere of influence, and away from the would-be hegemon, the increasingly aggressive China.

Lol...I heard Charlie Brown Paul Ryan gurgitate similar nonsense this morning.

32 posted on 05/13/2015 11:35:57 AM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: xzins; metmom; Piranha; Alamo-Girl; marron; P-Marlowe; hosepipe; YHAOS; caww; Jim Robinson
Jeepers, you seem to be such a pessimist, dear brother in Christ! I wonder why you feel justified in this line of thinking, in that we Christians are called upon at all times to demonstrate the seminal Christian virtues: Faith, HOPE, and Love.

Then again, I can understand, and strongly empathize with, the following:

He begins to leave who begins to love.
Many the leaving who know it not,
for the feet of those leaving are affections of the heart:
and yet, they are leaving Babylon. — St. Augustine, Ennarrationes in Psalmos, 64.2

Make of these lines what you will. They are not directly "scriptural." Nonetheless, I find them quite stirring, and profoundly true.

In a certain way, I have made my spiritual exodus from the current insanity of the degraded, utterly corrupt and ultimately suicidal course of what passes for "American society" these days. But as long as I exist in mortal body, I can't just "sit it out" and wait for the End Times.

As long as I'm "here" on Earth, my Christian duty is to live in the Lord, to honor and witness to His Truth; and to as much as possible radiate that truth outwards, into the greater society. I say this with the full understanding that, to do so, is to put a target on one's back that the psychopathic, "new atheist" screaming-meemies out there will always be trying to "draw a bead on."

To me, the practical question here is: Is America worth saving? Or have you entirely given up on American exceptionalism?

Understand here that the historical self-understanding of We the People of the United States of America is that, although we are constitutionally organized as a secular government, we are nonetheless, finally, ultimately a free people "under God." For our freedom, our inalienable liberties, come from God. The Declaration of Independence makes this crystal clear. And the First Amendment guarantees it. [Not to mention the Second, if push comes to shove.]

It seems to me it's time, even past time, for the "saving remnant" — that is, faithful Christians — to step up and shoulder the responsibilities they bear as sons of Christ in this world.

Don't speak so much about what you want. Think about what you should be doing.

I have HOPE that God has not given up on We the People. I have HOPE that a spiritual renewal can heal America. Thus we Christians must pray for such renewal — personal, cultural, societal — which amounts to a plea for divine intercession.

Which I find perfectly reasonable.

For our Lord will hear our prayers!

33 posted on 05/13/2015 12:14:58 PM PDT by betty boop (Science deserves all the love we can give it, but that love should not be blind. — NR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
Lol...I heard ... Paul Ryan gurgitate similar nonsense this morning.

In what way do you find this NONSENSE???

(You left that part out.)

34 posted on 05/13/2015 12:16:57 PM PDT by betty boop (Science deserves all the love we can give it, but that love should not be blind. — NR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; metmom; Piranha; Alamo-Girl; marron; P-Marlowe; hosepipe; YHAOS; caww; Jim Robinson
To me, the practical question here is: Is America worth saving? Or have you entirely given up on American exceptionalism?

It is not hope I've given up on, dear Sister, but on the republican establishment. I've always found it interesting that the early Christian writers, themselves Jews, referred to the leaders of the anti-Jesus movement as "the Jews." They knew what they meant....the establishment....and others had to put 2 and 2 together.

So, I don't trust Republicans. At other times I might call you republican, and most of this ping list also, and I am more than occasionally a supporter of republicans. But, there are times when the word is profanity.

I could call them RINO, but I sort of agree with Goldberg, that I just might be the one who actually is the republican in name only, because I sure don't fit with the establishment. Up is down and down is up, and the establishment calls the shots, makes the rules, spends the money, and sets the direction. They might just own the name and they can have it. Reagan, too, would have been the RINO in this sense.

I'm the conservative. They are the Republican.

And optimism nor pessimism is the issue, but honesty about what one sees. How does that old hymn go... "My hope is built on nothing less, than Jesus' blood and righteousness."

35 posted on 05/13/2015 12:49:14 PM PDT by xzins (Donate to the Freep-a-Thon or lose your ONLY voice. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

The only way to ensure America remains “competitive” is to give away access to our markets.

That nonsense.


36 posted on 05/13/2015 1:05:41 PM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Well said... centered, cogent, simple....

Jeepers, you seem to be such a pessimist, dear brother in Christ! I wonder why you feel justified in this line of thinking, in that we Christians are called upon at all times to demonstrate the seminal Christian virtues: Faith, HOPE, and Love.

Then again, I can understand, and strongly empathize with, the following:

He begins to leave who begins to love.
Many the leaving who know it not,
for the feet of those leaving are affections of the heart:
and yet, they are leaving Babylon. — St. Augustine, Ennarrationes in Psalmos, 64.2

Make of these lines what you will. They are not directly "scriptural." Nonetheless, I find them quite stirring, and profoundly true.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Me trying to add value: Dreams, Love, Wisdom....

37 posted on 05/13/2015 2:15:33 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck
The only way to ensure America remains “competitive” is to give away access to our markets.

That strikes me as a singularly one-dimensional view of an inordinately complex problem. Not to say thoroughly illogical and, given American history, counterintuitive.

But still, you have told me nothing about the facts on the ground that persuaded you to reduce this multi-faceted problem to purely one-dimensional economic terms.

Plus your "conclusion" apparently leaves America in a toothless, supine position WRT to rest of the world. Which since WWII, has depended on America as the moral center of world order, by virtue of its tremendous cultural power, and the economic and military power that flows from that.

I gather America is no longer allowed to be America in your book.

38 posted on 05/13/2015 3:04:38 PM PDT by betty boop (Science deserves all the love we can give it, but that love should not be blind. — NR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: xzins
I, too, have an "old hymn" that I very much favor. It's called The Battle Hymn of the Republic....

Different strokes for different folks, I gather.

39 posted on 05/13/2015 3:07:10 PM PDT by betty boop (Science deserves all the love we can give it, but that love should not be blind. — NR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xzins; betty boop; metmom; Piranha; Alamo-Girl; marron; P-Marlowe; hosepipe; YHAOS; caww; ...
RE: The Battle Hymn of the Republic: the lyrics:

Mine eyes have seen the glory
Of the coming of the Lord
He is trampling out the vintage
Where the grapes of wrath are stored
He has loosed the fateful lightening
Of His terrible swift sword
His truth is marching on

I have seen him in the watch-fires
Of a hundred circling camps
They have builded him an altar
In the evening dews and damps
I can read his righteous sentence
By the dim and flaring lamps
His day is marching on

I have read a fiery gospel
Writ in burnish'd rows of steel
As ye deal with my condemners
So with you my grace shall deal
Let the hero, born of woman
Crush the serpent with his heel

Since God is marching on

Glory, glory, hallelujah
Glory, glory, hallelujah
Glory, glory, hallelujah
Our God is marching on

He has sounded forth the trumpet
That shall never call retreat
He is sifting out the hearts of men
Before His judgment-seat
Oh, be swift, my soul
To answer him be jubilant, my feet
Our God is marching on

Glory, glory, hallelujah
Glory, glory, hallelujah
Glory, glory, hallelujah
Our God is marching on

In the beauty of the lilies
Christ was born across the sea
With a glory in his bosom
That transfigures you and me
As he died to make men holy
Let us live to make men free
While God is marching on

Glory, glory, hallelujah
Glory, glory, hallelujah
Glory, glory, hallelujah
Our God is marching on

Funny story: I sang the Battle Hymn, gospel-style, at my high school class reunion a couple of years ago. I was almost booed off of the stage....

Notwithstanding that my other two songs of the evening, covers of Patty Cline's "Crazy," and Bonnie Raitt's "Runaway," were very well received.

Go figure.

I strongly doubt I will ever attend a high school class reunion ever again. This entire experience has left such a bad taste in my mouth....

40 posted on 05/13/2015 3:32:29 PM PDT by betty boop (Science deserves all the love we can give it, but that love should not be blind. — NR>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson