Posted on 05/11/2015 5:19:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
No one knows how Hillary Clinton will do as president, if she gets the chance.
But we do know she is probably the best qualified presidential candidate ever, at least when it comes to checking off relevant boxes. This comes up today because a writer for the Weekly Standard claimed she would be an “affirmative-action” president (an argument easily knocked down by Jonathan Chait at New York).
Let's go through her resume:
She has been a senator (for longer than Barack Obama was and longer than Rand Paul or Ted Cruz or Marco Rubio will have been in 2016). Remember, she also has experience on the House side, as a staff member of the Judiciary Committee during Watergate.
As for the executive branch, she was in the cabinet, in the front-line job as secretary of state. It's rare among modern presidents to have any such experience. She has also worked in the White House, as a top adviser to her husband when he was president.
While Clinton never served as a governor or state legislator, she had a formal role in planning education reforms in Arkansas when her husband was governor and helped sell them to the legislature.
More? She was involved with the Children’s Defense Fund at the state and national level for years, eventually becoming national chairwoman for several years. So check off the “interest groups” box.
She had a full career as a lawyer — as a partner in the Rose Law Firm, which, among other things, qualifies as a small business. No, she wasn't an executive at a big company anywhere, but she has been on the boards of Wal-Mart and other corporations.
As far as I know, she has no experience in local government. She hasn't been a judge or worked directly for the federal judiciary, although she has been around the courts enough. She hasn't had a formal position in the Democratic Party (unless I missed that), but she has been an important party actor for years.
All things being equal, I’d rather have a president who is familiar with the White House, the executive branch, both chambers of Congress, state government, interest groups and various private-sector companies.
Of course, things are rarely equal. People can debate how well she performed in all these jobs and positions, and take issue with her policies and views. The positive aspects of her resume alone won't likely be a deciding factor for voters in the Democratic primaries, let alone in a general election, where party is (quite properly) far more important.
Still, it isn't hard in presidential history to find huge failures stemming at least partly from inexperience, whether it was Bill Clinton’s awful transition or George W. Bush's deferenceto people in his administration who manipulated him, or Jimmy Carter’s inability to work with anyone in the federal government. Hillary Clinton, if she is elected, may not avoid making some of these mistakes, but no one will be able to blame them on a lack of experience.
In having what some political scientists call "presidential branch" experience, she is similar to vice presidents, who when they take on substantive roles do so as advisers to the president, rather than within an executive-branch department or agency.
The Malay Mail a/k/a the Malmail.
Where is the BARF alert?!
What is that awful smell?
Details, please!
“it might just force the D party to nominate an honest (and loyal) person ?”
Name just ONE such person in the D party! (By loyal, I assume you mean loyal American? Loyal to the Constitution (as written, not as judicially revised)
“she also has experience on the House side, as a staff member of the Judiciary Committee during Watergate.”
Which she was thrown off of for being a corrupt, lying bitch!
She did nothing while she was a Senator and got four people killed and lost 6 billion dollars while Secretary of State.
Real success, there.
Sadly, it doesn’t matter how bad we think Hillary is, the GOP wants Jebster to lose graciously.
Primary Qualification:
UNUSED lady parts.
Please list these qualifications ,LOL
Bet this fool is on the Clinton Foundation beneficiaries list.
“But we do know she is probably the best qualified presidential candidate ever, . . . .”
More qualified when running for POTUS than the following?
George Washington
John Adams
Thomas Jefferson
James Madison
James Monroe
John Quincy Adams
Martin Van Buren
James K. Polk
Henry Clay
William Howard Taft
Calvin Coolidge
Dwight Eisenhower
Richard Nixon
George H.W. Bush
Jonathan Bernstein is obviously underqualified as a commentator!
Guess whose going to be invited to the next Clinton Foundation charity conference in Barbados?
Excuse me! Best qualified? NOT!
She is under-qualified and lacking some of the following POTUS properties:
Leadership(NONE),
Accomplishments (NONE),
Every seat occupied(EMPTY)
Failure(MIDDLENAME)
Everything touched(BROWN)
Temper(TRUE)
Recall(NONE)
But Hillary was born female, has a birth certificate, talks to Eleanor Roosevelt, and is old enough to be Ted Cruz’s mother. Gee Wally, what could be better...
Yeah, and she got fired from that job because of her lying incompetence.
She tried to subvert the Constitution by trying to prevent President Nixon from having legal representation during his trial.
Give me a flying fricking break!
Hillary is not similar to the vice president. She was the other half of the blue-plate special.
She ruled her husband's presidency as if she were the president. She made all the decisions. She hired all the staff.
The only thing that remotely connects her to the vice presidency is that she took Algore's office as her own in the West Wing. And, boy was he ever p!$$ed.
Warming various seats, spewing leftist tripe (Slang. something, especially speech or writing, that is false or worthless; rubbish) does not qualified make.
I just feel sorry for lost souls like this. Maybe he smokes too much pot or his mom accidentally dropped him on his head as an infant. Idk.
UNUSED lady parts.....Huma says...”KMA!! SHE did!!”
Next week: “Is Hillary a Goddess?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.