Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Immigration battle moves to the military
The Hill ^ | 5/5/2015 | Cristina Marcos

Posted on 05/05/2015 4:21:59 AM PDT by markomalley

A battle is brewing in the Republican Party over whether illegal immigrants granted deferred deportation by President Obama should be eligible to serve in the military.

Anti-immigration hard-liners and vulnerable Republicans who represent districts with large Hispanic populations are battling over provisions in the annual Defense authorization bill, which is set to come to the House floor next week.

The fight underscores the GOP’s difficulty in wrestling with Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allows qualified illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. as children to obtain temporary work permits. GOP presidential candidates are split over the issue, with staunch conservatives such as Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas) arguing it should be done away with. Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) have criticized Obama’s executive actions but have also called for workers living in the U.S. illegally to be given a path to legal status.

Obama’s 2012 actions have won some bipartisan support, while an expansion of the program announced after last year’s midterm elections has been more controversial. A federal appeals court is set to consider the legality of the 2014 actions.

The defense bill is the latest unlikely battleground on immigration because of the House Armed Services Committee’s adoption of two Democratic amendments that edge toward allowing young illegal immigrants to serve in the military.

One provision encourages the secretary of Defense to review allowing DACA recipients to serve in the armed forces; the other directs the Pentagon to evaluate how DACA recipients could expand the number of potential recruits and affect military readiness.

The first amendment, offered by Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.), attracted the votes of six Republicans, including vulnerable Reps. Mike Coffman (Colo.) and Martha McSally (Ariz.). It narrowly passed on a vote of 33-30.

Seven Republicans crossed the aisle to support the second amendment, sponsored by Rep. Marc Veasey (D-Texas). It was approved in a 34-29 committee vote.

Coffman, a Marine Corps combat veteran who will be a top Democratic target in the next election cycle, argued that so-called “Dreamers” who grew up in the U.S. and are part of the American workforce should be given a chance to enlist.

“I will fight to make sure our effort to encourage military service among Dreamers remains part of the NDAA [National Defense Authorization Act],” he said. “These kids grew up in this country, went to school here and often know of no other country. I want to give them the same opportunity I had to serve this country.”

Immigration hard-liner Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) promised a “major fight” when the bill hits the floor next week. He suggested that anyone who supports the provisions is voting to “expand the president’s amnesty agenda.”

“It is the wrong policy on the wrong bill at the worst time,” King said in a statement. “This will bring about a major fight among those of us who have given our oath to support and defend the Constitution and mean it, and those who simply gave their oath.

“This is a dark day both for those that defend the rule of law and those that seek to keep the United States safe,” King concluded.

More fights are on the way for the defense bill.

Rep. Jeff Denham (R-Calif.), a Democratic target who also represents a large Hispanic constituency, plans to offer his bill allowing young illegal immigrants to serve in the military in exchange for legal status as an amendment to the NDAA, a spokeswoman confirmed.

House GOP leadership denied him a vote on the proposal last year. In 2013, he withdrew his proposal under pressure from fellow Republicans who wanted to debate the measure separate from the massive Defense authorization.

If the proposals that deal with allowing illegal immigrants to serve in the military culminate in roll call votes, it will mark the second time this year the GOP has specifically voted on DACA.

The House adopted an amendment in January to a bill funding the Department of Homeland Security that would freeze the DACA program. But 26 Republicans, mostly centrists and lawmakers who represent a sizable number of Hispanics, broke ranks and joined Democrats in opposition.

House GOP leaders have been quiet about their next move.

The House Rules Committee, which decides how legislation is considered on the floor and is controlled by Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), is expected to announce which amendments will get votes by the middle of next week.

But Heritage Action, an influential conservative group, warned that the immigration proposals could scuttle passage of the entire Defense authorization. The organization previously threatened to urge members to vote against last year’s defense bill if Denham’s amendment was adopted.

“If amnesty politics are allowed to seep into the NDAA, it will jeopardize the bill’s status as must-pass. Conservatives expect leadership will not allow an NDAA on the floor that contains either of these provisions,” Heritage Action spokesman Dan Holler told The Hill.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: aliens; illegalaliens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 05/05/2015 4:21:59 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley
So Obama wants to replace American born Service Men and Women with foreign born individuals?
What could possibly go wrong.
2 posted on 05/05/2015 4:30:54 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

So.. illegals are going to be issued security clearances as well? Gee, what could possibly go wrong?


3 posted on 05/05/2015 4:31:32 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Hillary is nothing more than a white, wrinkled form of Obama in pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0
An Army that has NO allegiance to the community.
4 posted on 05/05/2015 4:32:01 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What’s the Spanish equivalent for “Hessian”?


5 posted on 05/05/2015 4:37:41 AM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0

This was one of the major factors why Rome fell. They allowed foreigners and barbarians into their ranks and they did not have any loyalty at all.


6 posted on 05/05/2015 4:42:26 AM PDT by max americana (fired liberals in our company last election, and I laughed while they cried (true story))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Our illegal brethren need not worry, the RINO’s will cave in. They do not want to be called racist. It’s just awful to be called names. It really makes for a bad day.

Just think, not being called a bad name by the MSM and being able to enjoy all the perks of being a corrupt politician, sorta like having your cake and eating it too.


7 posted on 05/05/2015 4:45:43 AM PDT by redfreedom (All it takes for evil to win is for good people to do nothing - that's how the left took over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0

The Roman Empire did the same thing and it helped bring about its fall.


8 posted on 05/05/2015 4:45:53 AM PDT by jimbo123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

SURE....... JIHADIS WELCOME.... dont we learn from things like FORT HOOD


9 posted on 05/05/2015 5:51:15 AM PDT by zzwhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Congressman Mo Brooks (R-AL) put this vote into perspective yesterday:

Early this morning, the House Armed Services Committee (HASC) passed the FY 2016 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) after open borders and amnesty proponents added Congressman Ruben Gallego’s (D-AZ) amendment, on a 33-30 vote, that encourages the Secretary of Defense to declare that DACA illegal aliens are “vital” to America’s national interest and thus eligible to enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces even though they are not American citizens.

In previous years, HASC defeated similar efforts to help illegal aliens compete for and take military service opportunities from American citizens. However, six wayward Republicans spurned the HASC Chairman and 30 of their GOP colleagues by voting to put illegal aliens first and American citizens second. Congressman Mo Brooks (R-AL) strongly opposed this amendment.

Below is a list of House Republicans who can stop this from moving forward. Please click on their names for a pre-written tweet and send your own message using twitter handles and Facebook page links.

House GOP Rules Committee Members:

Pete Sessions

@PeteSessions

https://www.facebook.com/petesessions

Virginia Foxx

@virginiafoxx

https://www.facebook.com/RepVirginiaFoxx

Tom Cole

@TomColeOK04

https://www.facebook.com/TomColeOK04

Rob Woodall

@RepRobWoodall

https://www.facebook.com/RepRobWoodall

Michael Burgess

@michaelcburgess

https://www.facebook.com/michaelcburgess

Steve Stivers

@RepSteveStivers

https://www.facebook.com/RepSteveStivers

Doug Collins

@RepDougCollins

https://www.facebook.com/RepresentativeDougCollins

Bradley Byrne

@RepByrne

https://www.facebook.com/RepByrne

Dan Newhouse

@RepNewhouse

https://www.facebook.com/RepNewhouse

House GOP Leadership Members:

John Boehner

@SpeakerBoehner

https://www.facebook.com/SpeakerJohnBoehner

Kevin McCarthy

@GOPLeader

https://www.facebook.com/CongressmanKevinMcCarthy

Steve Scalise

@SteveScalise

https://www.facebook.com/RepSteveScalise

Cathy McMorris Rodgers

@cathymcmorris

https://www.facebook.com/mcmorrisrodgers

Luke Messer

@RepLukeMesser

https://www.facebook.com/RepLukeMesser


10 posted on 05/05/2015 6:00:37 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Putting criminals into our military is so shockingly stupid and so obviously dangerous that I didn’t think even Obama could come up with an idea that dangerous. Once again, I underestimated his level of evil.


11 posted on 05/05/2015 6:23:36 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0

Kind of like Germanic tribesmen who became Roman auxiliaries, but could never be trusted by the Romans.


12 posted on 05/05/2015 6:53:39 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Some times you need more than six shots. Much more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

The last thing we need is a bunch of illegals in the military. We have plenty of red blooded American boys to do the job.


13 posted on 05/05/2015 8:23:23 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0

Yep. Kind of reminds of when Ceausecu raided the orphanages for his Secret Police. Therefore they only had one loyalty to him and/or the State.


14 posted on 05/05/2015 8:52:22 AM PDT by bjorn14 (Woe to those who call good evil and evil good. Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley; 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; ..
Ping!

Click the keyword Aliens to see more illegal alien, border security, and other related threads.

15 posted on 05/05/2015 9:13:32 AM PDT by HiJinx (I can see Mexico from my back porch...soon, so will you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0

Bingo. No investment, no loyalty.


16 posted on 05/05/2015 10:57:01 AM PDT by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

bttt


17 posted on 05/05/2015 11:28:49 AM PDT by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

I really can’t believe I’m reading this.

Illegals with machine guns provided by...us.


18 posted on 05/05/2015 9:55:58 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

It’s been coming on slowly, yet inexorably.
Quite like the frog in the blender, eh?


19 posted on 05/06/2015 2:10:07 PM PDT by HiJinx (I can see Mexico from my back porch...soon, so will you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx

Quite like the frog in the blender, eh?
= = = = = = = = = = = =

I suspect you were meaning frog in water brought to a boil?


20 posted on 05/06/2015 2:27:40 PM PDT by xrmusn ((6/98)A pessimist damns the wind, an optimist thinks it will change and a realist adjusts the sails.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson