Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben Carson, famed neurosurgeon, running for president
Washington Post ^ | 05/03/2015 | Steve Peoples

Posted on 05/03/2015 5:45:56 PM PDT by GIdget2004

Ben Carson, retired neurosurgeon turned conservative star, has confirmed that he will seek the Republican presidential nomination in 2016.

Carson, who has never run for public office, is expected to be the only high-profile African-American to enter the GOP’s presidential primary as he tries to parlay his success as an author and speaker into a competitive campaign against established politicians.

“I’m willing to be part of the equation and therefore, I’m announcing my candidacy for president of the United States of America,” he said in an interview aired Sunday night by Ohio’s WKRC television station.

He is set to make a more formal announcement during a speech from his native Detroit on Monday.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; 2016gopprimary; 2ndamendment; banglist; bencarson; carson2016; election2016; gungrabber; secondamendment; vanitycandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-264 next last
To: GIdget2004

Good. The more the merrier, the wider the debate the better informed a brain dead public might become.


101 posted on 05/03/2015 9:09:32 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bramps

To blazes with links. I’m standing by my statement.


102 posted on 05/03/2015 9:15:55 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

“We’ll destroy each and every last candidate we have...no matter how Conservative they are TODAY.”

I’m convinced that we (Conservatives and/or Freepers) would have tried to destroy Reagan if he tried to run now.

Amnesty
Gun Control laws in California (he prohibited open-carry).
Marine Lebanon bombing, then leaving shortly there-after.
Increased our debt.
Etc.

Don’t get me wrong - he was one of our greatest Presidents, but he had several things that today would earn him a RINO label. Obviously he wasn’t. We need to remember his 90% rule or whatever it was.


103 posted on 05/03/2015 9:18:26 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

Not those stupid canards again.


104 posted on 05/03/2015 9:19:09 PM PDT by GeronL (Clearly Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

You say something outlandish about him and then have no link?
Where did the comment come from? It was only tonight that you wrote it.

Do not bear false witness.


105 posted on 05/03/2015 9:20:14 PM PDT by bramps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

You are dead wrong,more the merrier,now let em earn it


106 posted on 05/03/2015 9:21:12 PM PDT by advertising guy ( panties - not the best thing on earth, but next to it .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #107 Removed by Moderator

To: GIdget2004

He’s a gun grabber.


108 posted on 05/03/2015 9:23:42 PM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

You ‘stand by’ a lie that Ben carson wants to put microchips under people’s skin and you have zero proof to back it up. Your home page is full of Christian phrases.
And now you are threatening me.
I have never heard of any Christian denomination that has those rules.


109 posted on 05/03/2015 9:28:30 PM PDT by bramps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Is this the strongest arugment you can make - some sound bytes from a Glen Beck appearance? You misrepresent Carson’s position in stating the he believes cities “don’t need a Second Amendment.” But then, you’ve never shown yourself to the chillax type. I do not find it unreasonable to be concerned that a semi-automatic weapon may fall into the hands of a criminally insane person in a highly populated area. It may be wrong, but it is not particularly unreasonable or liberal, like insisting that guns be taken away from all urban dwellers as you suggest Carson to be saying. It is not as if Carson is calling for bans on gun ownership in urban environments.

Having read through the balance of your rants on this thread, you come off once again as a certified jerk. Trying being a man (if that’s what you are) and let Carson speak for himself. His positions are clear enough without your drama-queen interpretations. He is no Cruz. Nor is he a liberal. Nor will he likely be elected President of the United States. But he deserves to let his positions stand without your overdrawn, lame conclusions. I’m sure Carson is man enough to make clear where he stands on the issues, and man enough to admit when he overstates his case. You? Not so much.


110 posted on 05/03/2015 9:32:35 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Even the compassion of the wicked is cruel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bramps

I’m standing by my statement because it’s not a lie.

The Lord Jesus Christ sees all.

Why don’t you tell us what your agenda is?


111 posted on 05/03/2015 9:33:18 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: bramps

I’ve never had this many private and nonprivate replies by the same person on the same thread.


112 posted on 05/03/2015 9:35:19 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Canard? (Rumor)

*********************************************
As Governor, in response to the Black Panthers open carry marches:

“Governor Reagan told reporters that afternoon that he saw “no reason why on the street today a citizen should be carrying loaded weapons.” He called guns a “ridiculous way to solve problems that have to be solved among people of good will.” In a later press conference, Reagan said he didn’t “know of any sportsman who leaves his home with a gun to go out into the field to hunt or for target shooting who carries that gun loaded.” The Mulford Act, he said, “would work no hardship on the honest citizen.”

*********************************************
After he was president:

Feb. 7, 1989

LOS ANGELES (AP) _

Reagan received extended applause when answering a question about over-the- counter military weapons, such as the AK-47 assault rifle used to gun down five Stockton schoolchildren last month.

‘’I do not believe in taking away the right of the citizen for sporting, for hunting and so forth, or for home defense,’’ he said. ‘’But I do believe that an AK-47, a machine gun, is not a sporting weapon or needed for defense of a home.’’

************************************************

The last one sounds a lot like Carson’s statement. But really - you think that Reagan’s support of banning open-carry in California wouldn’t be an issue if FreeRepublic hadn’t been around back in the day?

I’m just saying, we won’t ever find the “perfect” candidate - Reagan wasn’t. And so far, Cruz is #1 in my book, but some will find his support of legal immigration not conservative enough.


113 posted on 05/03/2015 9:36:49 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts It is happening again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Spare me the liberal talking in circles bullshit. This was discussed to death recently on FR, Every right wing radio and TV show and freaking DU. there are thousands of articles on it.

If I misrepresented him, then you need to talk to him about his quoted words. Because thats what HE said. Do you nor understand english or is it that you apply newspeak to your mewling liberalism?


114 posted on 05/03/2015 9:40:12 PM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: bramps

Do you think Ben Carson is the kind of man who would stand by his word?

I’ve had the impression he is. If Carson makes a statement, it’s his duty to answer for it. Not mine.


115 posted on 05/03/2015 9:41:01 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Seems quite strange that you won’t provide a link to such an outrageous comment. Must have been all over the news. We both know why you won’t provide a link to where you got it: No such link exists. He never said any such thing. The really strange thing is that you won’t just admit it was wrong to post such a thing without knowing it to be true. Sleep well.


116 posted on 05/03/2015 9:41:11 PM PDT by bramps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: bramps

Do you think Ben Carson is the kind of man who would stand by his word?

I’ve had the impression he is. If Carson makes a statement, it’s his duty to answer for it. Not mine.


117 posted on 05/03/2015 9:41:55 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

The RINO’s hated Reagan. Trying to use Reagan as an example to support RINO’s is not going to get you very far.

Amnesty? It was a deal he made with the Democrats, they lied to him, he said it was probably his biggest mistake.

Budgets are written by Congress, not Presidents.


118 posted on 05/03/2015 9:42:16 PM PDT by GeronL (Clearly Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

I will not vote for anyone but a Cruz or a Palin at this point.

I wouldn’t even considering voting for Jeb Bush under any circumstances.


119 posted on 05/03/2015 9:43:16 PM PDT by GeronL (Clearly Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: bramps

The Good Lord Jesus Christ watches over us all. There is nothing he doesn’t see.


120 posted on 05/03/2015 9:43:40 PM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 261-264 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson