Posted on 05/01/2015 7:08:00 AM PDT by Kaslin
For the last 20 years, give or take another 50, one of the most cherished baubles of Beltway conventional wisdom has been that the Republican Party has moved too far to the right. We'll come back to that in a moment.
Another beloved trinket in the nest of notions that make up elite groupthink is that liberals not only haven't moved left, but they aren't even liberals at all. A week doesn't go by without Barack Obama insisting that he's merely a pragmatist and problem-solver, with nary an ideological ax to grind. Shortly after he was re-elected, Obama told David Gregory, then the host of "Meet the Press," the obvious takeaway of his presidency is that, "I'm not driven by some ideological agenda. I'm a pretty practical guy and I just want to make sure that things work."
A few weeks later, he gave the most ideologically left-wing State of the Union address of any president since FDR.
This is a pattern. For whatever reason, liberals feel compelled -- whether out of self-delusion or deliberate deception -- to lie about the fact that they are liberals. Consider The New Republic, once the flagship journal of American liberalism. When Facebook multimillionaire Chris Hughes took it over a couple years ago, he had bold plans (which have ended in near-complete failure).
In his mission statement Hughes proclaimed, "The journalism in these pages will strive to be free of party ideology or partisan bias." Whatever you may think of The New Republic these days, this was a ridiculous thing to say, and it's proven to be an even more vacuous fog of nonsense words since then. Indeed, in the very same issue, Hughes conducted a fawning and utterly partisan and ideological interview with Obama.
There's something almost Soviet in this compulsion to follow a party line so disconnected to the reality it allegedly describes.
Unfortunately, the vast majority of the Beltway establishment, particularly political journalists, believes these talking points, largely because they, too, are committed liberals who think they are mere non-ideological arbiters of the facts.
How strange the world must seem to them these days. Public opinion surveys show that Democratic voters have moved consistently to the left over the last two decades.
In 1994, according to the Pew Research Center, less than a third (30 percent) of Democrats described themselves as "mostly or consistently liberal." In 2014, a solid majority (56 percent) identified themselves as liberal.
Meanwhile, with the obvious exception of gay rights, the country simply hasn't moved left with the Democratic Party. In 2012, political scientist James Stimson found that the American public was more conservative than at any time since 1952.
This is one reason Obama's "what works" presidency hasn't worked for the Democrats. By committing to a left-wing agenda -- while pretending it's pragmatic -- the Democrats have been hollowed out in Congress and in state governments across the country. Obama had hoped to restore confidence in the competence of government. Instead, government's reputation is in tatters.
"By ignoring the electorate and steering the country in an unmistakably progressive direction his final two years in office," National Journal's Josh Krauhaar wrote in February, "he's ensuring that his presidency will be more of an eight-year mirage for liberals, rather than one known for winning lasting support for policies that would move the country in a leftward direction."
Poor Hillary Clinton. She spent the last 20-plus years trying to convince the country she wasn't as left-wing as people justifiably believed she was, and now she must risk whiplash as she veers to the left to reassure the base -- and to block a potential Elizabeth Warren run and a real presidential bid by avowed socialist Bernie Sanders. "She seems always to be zigging when history zags," writes the Washington Post's Chuck Lane.
Watching her pretend to be a populist is painful, like watching some of the joke contestants on "American Idol" tonelessly warble to a panel of snickering judges.
Now, it is certainly true that Republicans are not without their problems. They desperately need coaching on how to talk about issues in a way that doesn't alienate voters. But one of the reasons they need tutoring in this regard is that the press which reports on their campaigns is even more out of touch with reality than the allegedly out-of-touch Republicans they opine on.
If someone nods along when Obama ludicrously claims to have no ideological agenda, it's no surprise he'll shake his head when a conservative admits to having one. But at least the conservatives aren't lying.
This summer the cities are going to burn and the dems are going to let it happen. Anything for Obama to declare martial law.
What about those neocons who are disguising an underlying sympathy for Marxism with a facade of patriotism?
The idea that being "practical" or "pragmatic" means focusing on "what works," means sneaking in a definition of "works." Only after we know what it means for something to "work" can we see what is meant by "practical" or "pragmatic."
Watch out for those who subtly import their own biases under the guise of being "practical."
On the contrary - they are claiming the neutral ground, even though there isn’t any neutral ground in ideology or worldview.
By claiming neutrality, then anything to the contrary can be characterized as “extreme”.
It's not "failure" if you redefine "success."
It's not "perversion" if you redefine "normal."
It's not "weak" if you redefine "strong."
And it's not "evil" if you redefine "good."
Fortunately, conservatives have an inviolable standard that judges those things.
Yes—it’s the old Marxist trick to control perceptions of the masses by controlling the Words and Language. Wittgenstein and the Wundtians and Pavlovians all knew how to accomplish this by 1900..
The destruction of the meaning of Words started long before “Progressive” and “Liberal” were made intentionally incomprehensible and meaningless. The Language has been so butchered by the Marxists that people are unable to process information-—it is only emotions-—never Reason, which surfaces today—like Eastern “logic” where Truth has many contradictions.
The concept of Natural Law Theory—Objective Truth-—Modern Science has devolved into a “feel good” tribal collective ideology.
The Leftists destroy the possibility of logic-—by destroying the meaning of Words-—like “Religion of Peace” or Pro-Choice” or homosexual “marriage” which literally is made irrational from the basic assumptions.
Marxism is the Big Lie-—every word from their mouth is warped to the extreme by their irrational assumptions and denial of Objective Truth/God and Reality.
In the same way, most secularists and atheists think that they are neutral and objective in terms of religion. They will not admit to having secular religious views on god, afterlife, etc. Their atheistic views are just as “religious” as Christian views.
But that also explains why it is as impossible to communicate with liberals as it is to converse with Humpty Dumpty, to whom "words mean just what I want them to mean, nothing more, nothing less."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.