Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Noble; Cincinatus' Wife

My preferred candidate is Ted Cruz.

Re: Scott Walker and same-sex marriage -

Under current court rulings striking down states on same-sex marriage, and under a coming SCOTUS ruling almost certain to make a sweeping determination that there’s a Constitutional right to same-sex marriage, the question then DOES become, “can states ban same-sex marriage?”

Walker appears to be advancing his own belief that states have the right to define marriage. Under the Tenth Amendment they certainly do. By banning all but heterosexual marriage between one man and one woman, that WAS where most states stood on this, until Holder refused to follow the Defense of Marriage Act, and until federal courts started knocking down states like dominos on this issue. Federal Courts nor any other federal branch were given that power, therefore it devolves to the states.

I don’t see a problem with Scott Walker on this issue. His stance is absolutely the correct and courageous one.

Walker is being criticized by some for allowing a court decision to decide it for Wisconsin. In other words for not standing for nullification, civil disobedience, resistance - whatever one calls it - when federal courts usurp states powers.

What he might be trying to do is use states to amend the Constitution to actually spell out in precise words that states are the ones to decide this issue, by making it an agenda item if a Fifth Amendment Convention of the States does happen (see Mark Levin’s “The Liberty Amendments”), to put such a proposed amendment in play, there.

That seems to be where he’s heading on this. What other venue could produce an amendment that says the states, only, can define marriage, besides that one?

In the meantime, let’s compare his position on whether to obey, or to nullify, a federal court ruling on this issue, with positions of other candidates on the same thing.

Let’s compare apples to apples.


22 posted on 04/26/2015 6:58:43 AM PDT by txrangerette (("...hold to the TRUTH; speak without fear". - Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: txrangerette

THANK YOU!


25 posted on 04/26/2015 7:02:22 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: txrangerette
By banning all but heterosexual marriage between one man and one woman

These are not "bans on gay marriage."

Stop playing the leftist propaganda game.

All states did was define marriage as between one man/one woman based on biblical, historical, and constitutional laws.

Homosexuals can get married....they just have to marry a member of the opposite sex.

30 posted on 04/26/2015 7:05:20 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (ANYBODY BUT FRICKING JEB AND HILLARY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: txrangerette

With the current Supreme Court walker is correct.


51 posted on 04/27/2015 10:10:24 AM PDT by Lumper20 ( clown in Chief has own Gov employees Gestapo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson