Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton Isn’t Popular Anymore
Washington Free Beacon ^ | April 6, 2015 | Andrew Stiles

Posted on 04/07/2015 6:39:19 AM PDT by Zakeet

Hillary Clinton used to be pretty popular. When she was sworn in as secretary of State in 2009, Clinton boasted a favorable/unfavorable rating of 57 percent-34 percent. Her numbers stayed relatively steady during her tenure at the State Department.

But ever since Clinton quit her job in 2013 and started preparing for a second White House run (the first was a failure), her popularity has declined significantly. According to a recent survey from Public Policy Polling, Clinton’s favorable/unfavorable rating is currently underwater:

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: 2016election; benghazi; democrat; election2016; hillary; hillary2016; hillaryclinton; hitlery; libya; poll; southcarolina; treygowdy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

She was a lot more popular in the good old days ... when she was busy chucking ashtrays at Bubba.

1 posted on 04/07/2015 6:39:19 AM PDT by Zakeet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

she never was popular

not even among her current husbands


2 posted on 04/07/2015 6:40:54 AM PDT by Mr. K (“Imma go out like muthafking Tupac muh n-word yeah bleeved dat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

When she reaches 50 percent, Bill can start dating again.


3 posted on 04/07/2015 6:45:33 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("If he were working for the other side, what would he be doing differently ?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
One has to ask, where would Hillary be today if not for Slick's coattails?

Married to Chelsea's daddy & handling traffic tickets outta the Rose Law Firm !

4 posted on 04/07/2015 6:46:00 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

This is why the MSM will be doubly harsh and nasty towards the GOP nominee. They have to raise the negatives of that candidate to offset Hillary’s high negatives. I don’t think it will matter for her. I agree with a good many people here that she won’t be the Democratic nominee. Team Obama has the goods on her with the emails and they already have a candidate in the wings to take her place.


5 posted on 04/07/2015 6:46:15 AM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
she never was popular

Absolutely correct. All she ever was was wish-fulfillment projection from feminists and an avatar for Bill Clinton to his enduring fans.

6 posted on 04/07/2015 6:49:10 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

Zombies, mostly unmarried females will vote foe her because of her ‘plumbing’ no matter what.


7 posted on 04/07/2015 6:49:42 AM PDT by BigEdLB (They need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' which has nothing to do with virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

who is this female person?


8 posted on 04/07/2015 6:49:45 AM PDT by B212
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Hillary was popular when she didn’t do anything and the media went 20/7 pumping her up. Now that she is, well, being Hillary again, people are reminded that she is Nixon in a pantsuit.


9 posted on 04/07/2015 6:55:28 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The problem is that she is popular ENOUGH - if you’re a democrat robot, SHE’S your new savior after barry skadaddles on to bigger and better things for hisseff.


10 posted on 04/07/2015 7:04:40 AM PDT by joethedrummer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The Clintons flooding their foundations w/ billions while she was privy to ntl security secrets is reprehensible......but even more criminal is what they did w/ the billions once they had it in their coffers.

======================================================

HERE'S A CLUE Federal Prosecutors investigating pedophile's Jeffry Epstein's records found Clinton listed as having a shocking 21 email addresses and tele nos. L/E recognizes multiple email addresses and tele nos as the MO for money-laundering and tax evasion.

Are any of the Clinton phone numbers merely answering services fronting fake companies?

The biggest foundation fraud is one foundation writing a check to another flundation---they MO to skim off money for themselves.... The check receiver keeps a cut then deposits the bulk offshore for the check-writer's use later. ......all tax-free

=======================================================

HERE'S ANOTHER CLUE: The Clinton Foundation Initially "Suggested That The $31.3 Million Contribution Listed On Its Tax Return Did Not Come From A Single Donor," Then Said "It Came From A Single Source, But Declined To Identify It."

"The $31.3 million donation, which was previously undisclosed, came from the Radcliffe Foundation run by Frank Giustra, a Canadian who has made millions financing mining deals around the world. Mr. Giustra has become a member of Mr. Clinton's inner circle, joining him on global trips and lending him the use of his private MD-87 jet.

For weeks, Clinton Foundation officials had suggested that the $31.3 million contribution listed on its tax return did not come from a single donor. They then said it came from a single source, but declined to identify it. Wednesday afternoon, a representative of Mr. Giustra contacted The Times and acknowledged the Radcliffe contribution." (SOURCE Don Van Natta Jr., Joe Becker and Mike McIntire, "In Charity And Politics, Clinton Donors Overlap," The New York Times, 12/20/07)

11 posted on 04/07/2015 7:15:03 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All
Hillary arrives in designer dress patterned after crack house wallpaper.

Will receive the coveted Gold-plated Knitting Needles statuette:
Cited as the Democrat candidate "Most Likely to Unravel."

12 posted on 04/07/2015 7:18:38 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
The Clintons are fond of bleating about their "love" for their fellow-man....and more than willing to make a buck on it.

=================================================

Hillary and Bill are the poster faces for phony
liberals afflicted w/ "feel-goodism"...and they've
profited mightily off of it. Billy recently bleated about
all "the good" the Clinton Family Foundation was doing (/snort).

"Smile everybody. Another $100 million came in today."

=================================================

The con artists Clintons created the ultimate scam: The Clinton Family Foundation! .... a slush fund as a "foundation."........or as some uncharitably call it "Hillary's 2016 Super-Pac."

The money-hungry Clintons have tight control. Each Clinton family member can be listed as an officer in some capacity. They then get all sorts of tax-free perks..... flying around in private planes, staying in upscale hotels.

For the cunning Clintons, every conversation can be chalked up to "foundation business"...and written off as "Charity." Thus a significant portion of the Clintons' real income is shielded from taxes.

The Clintons work the foundation game like an extortion racket.....strong-arming donors and giving them special standing---all of them sucking off the backs of struggling taxpayers.

13 posted on 04/07/2015 7:24:52 AM PDT by Liz (Another Clinton administration? Are you nuts?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

The fundamental question is:

has the Clinton Crime Family reached a stand-off agreement with the Chicago Mob for 2016?

Hillary and Baraq held an unannounced meeting at the WH on Mar 23. I wonder if she was obtaining approval.

In my view, the only thing that can stop Hillary taking the D nomination is if the Mob runs somebody else.

I read yesterday she has rented an entire floor of a NYC office building and has 35 campaign staffers already in place.


14 posted on 04/07/2015 7:26:00 AM PDT by nascarnation (Impeach, convict, deport)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

cankles never was.


15 posted on 04/07/2015 7:39:24 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

In 1993, she had her husband sign five executive orders which were all directed at the securing of abortion by
repealing pro-life measures taken by Ronald Reagan.

She wanted responsibility for all those "sacraments to Satan."

How many of those babies should have graduated from high school over the last few years?

16 posted on 04/07/2015 7:41:16 AM PDT by Slyfox (I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I remember the concert for the 911 NY Firefighters in NYC. Lots of big named acts. About halfway through the show here comes the hag Hillary on stage (being a New Yorker s/c)She was booed and booed with all the firemen up front saying "get off the stage!" The Beast just waved,pointed into the audience and smiled. When the DVD of the concert came out a few months later,the boos & jeers were changed to applause with the shots on the audience cut out.
17 posted on 04/07/2015 7:43:29 AM PDT by 4yearlurker (Fifteen two,fifteen four and a pair is six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

Mrs. Bill’s popularity is not relevant to her run for office or to the success of that run. She is the candidate judged most able to promote the Total State.


18 posted on 04/07/2015 7:55:21 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
Married to Chelsea's daddy

When was she married to Webb Hubbell?

19 posted on 04/07/2015 8:02:47 AM PDT by SVTCobra03 (You can never have enough friends, horsepower or ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
She looks like a frigging chipmunk with a mouth full of acorns.

Regards,
GtG

20 posted on 04/07/2015 9:07:08 AM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson