Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals May Regret Their New Rules
Townhall.com ^ | April 5, 2015 | Kurt Schlichter

Posted on 04/05/2015 5:33:41 AM PDT by Kaslin

That photo is me about ten years ago, standing in the ruins of a land where people rejected the rule of law in favor of the rule of force. I think a lot about my year-long deployment to Kosovo these days. I think a lot about people today who, for short term political points, cavalierly disregard the rules, laws and norms that made America what it is. I think a lot about how liberals, especially those who boo God, should pray to Him that those rules, laws and norms are restored.

I am most certainly not smiling – I am squinting in the winter sun, having doffed my ever-present Ray-Bans. Behind me is – well, was – a village along the Ibar River in northern Kosovo. In the 1990s, it was full of Serbs and gypsies (The new, politically correct term is “Roma”). Back then, after the disintegration of Yugoslavia, Kosovo was a province of Serbia. Without rehashing the centuries of ancient animosities and grievances, the Orthodox Serbs found themselves unrestrained by the political consensus that Josip Tito had enforced and began an escalating series of petty and not-so-petty oppressions against the Kosovar Albanians. The “K-Albs” are about 10% Christian but mostly moderate Muslims (we called them “party Muslims,” and our troops used to love to go on patrol through K-Alb towns during the spring when the gorgeous Albanian women were in full effect). They were a minority in Serbia as a whole, but a majority in the province of Kosovo.

Now, there’s no understanding Balkan hatreds – don’t even try. But basically, the tensions really kicked in after Slobodan Milosevic came to the battlefield at Kosovo Polje in 1989 on the 500th anniversary of the Muslim Ottoman Turks annihilating the cream of Serbian nobility. Thereafter, the campaign of exclusion and harassment against the K-Albs by Serbs ratcheted up. Where they had lived together in peace before, now the Serbs – unrestrained by laws, rules or norms – became increasingly despotic.

Eventually, the Serbs tried to drive out the despised minority K-Albs. NATO intervened and saved the Albanians, who promptly came back and drove the Serbs out. The Roma, perceived as allies of the Serbs, fled too. That village behind me wasn’t blown up by explosives. That damage was done by people, with picks and shovels and bare hands.

Which brings us to America in 2015. It’s becoming a nation where an elite that is certain of its power and its moral rightness is waging a cultural war on a despised minority. Except it’s not actually a minority – it only seems that way because it is marginalized by the coastal elitist liberals who run the mainstream media.

Today in America, we have a liberal president refuses to recognize the majority sent to Congress as a reaction to his progressive failures, and who uses extra-Constitutional means like executive orders to stifle the voice of his opponents. We have a liberal establishment on a secular jihad against people who dare place their conscience ahead of progressive dogma. And we have two different sets of laws, one for the little people and one for liberals like Lois Lerner, Al Sharpton and Hillary Clinton, who can blatantly commit federal crimes and walk away scot free and smirking.

Today in America, a despised minority that is really no minority is the target of an establishment that considers this minority unworthy of respect, unworthy of rights, and unworthy of having a say in the direction of this country. It’s an establishment that has one law for itself, and another for its enemies. It’s an establishment that inflicts an ever-increasing series of petty humiliations on its opponents and considers this all hilarious.

That’s a recipe for disaster. You cannot expect to change the status quo for yourself and then expect those you victimize not to play by the new rules you have created. You cannot expect to be able to discard the rule of law in favor of the rule of force and have those you target not respond in kind.

Liberals ask how a baker can believe that making a cake for a same sex wedding violates his conscience, but they don’t think about how the standard they are setting is that the government now gets to determine the validity of individual beliefs. Do they want us passing judgment on them?

Liberals imagine that their president can simply take whatever actions he pleases – including ones he previously admitted were unconstitutional – and that the next Republican president won’t do the same. Except then it will be to negate their cherished policies.

Liberals praise Harry Reid for lying about Mitt Romney and for ensuring the GOP’s voice can’t be heard on Capitol Hill, but they don’t think about what happens to them when they are out of power in an environment where slander is the norm and where minorities have no say. Conservatives have principles, but human nature is a powerful thing, and human nature favors payback.

The revolt has begun, peacefully. In 2010, and again in 2014, the Silent Majority returned and sent an unmistakable message to the liberal elite. When Bill Clinton got that message in 1994, he recognized that opposition and worked with it. But under Obama, the liberal elite acts to ignore and delegitimize the opposition. 2014 was not a tantrum; it was a warning, and the liberals are betting that they can bluff and bluster their way through it.

When you block all normal means of dissent, whether by ignoring the political will of you opponents or using the media to mock and abuse them, you build up the pressure. In 30+ years as an active conservative, I’ve never heard people so angry, so frustrated, so fed up. These emotions are supposed to be dissipated by normal political processes. But liberals are bottling them up. And they will blow. It’s only a matter of how.

Liberals need to understand the reality that rarely penetrates their bubble. Non-liberal Americans (it’s more than just conservatives who are under the liberal establishment’s heel) are the majority of this country. They hold power in many states and regions in unprecedented majorities. And these attacks focus on what they hold dearest – their religion, their families and their freedom.

What is the end game, liberals? Do you expect these people you despise to just take it? Do you think they’ll just shrug their shoulders and say, “Well, I guess we better comply?” Do you even know any real Americans? Do you think you’ll somehow be able to force them into obedience – for what is government power but force – after someone finally says “Enough?”

In my book Conservative Insurgency, I offer a scenario set in the late 2010s where the Texas governor refuses to allow Hillary Clinton to enforce an unconstitutional handgun ban within his state. It devolves into a brief, bloody spasm of violence, after which a sobered country walks back from the precipice and returns to resolving conflicts through the Constitution (albeit, with some lingering damage to our political and social norms). But there is no guarantee that things might not spin out of control the other way. And then liberals would be well advised to ask themselves who will be willing to fight and die to preserve their power and policies. In contrast, there are an awful lot of people willing to fight and die for their religion and our Constitution.

And let’s be blunt – these are the people with most of the guns and the training to use them. That’s the reality of the rule of force. I’ve seen it – it’s there behind me in that photo.

Now, this will no doubt draw the lie that I am somehow advocating violence. The current liberal habit of shamelessly lying about their opponents makes civil debate impossible. Similarly, the mockery of non-liberals before stacked audiences of trained seals a la Jon Stewart is part and parcel of the same strategy of delegitimizing any opposition. Closing down the option of discussion leaves their opponents with only the option of action. So far, the action has only been in funding campaigns for oppressed pizzerias and in the voting booth – though they’ve trying to nullify that too.

I’m not advocating violence – I am warning liberals that they are setting the conditions for violence.

And that better worry them, for the coastal elites are uniquely unsuited to a world where force rules instead of law. The Serbs were, at least, a warrior people. The soft boys and girls who brought us helicopter parenting, “trigger warnings” and coffee cups with diversity slogans are not.

I know the endgame of discarding the rule of law for short-term advantage because I stood in its ruins. Liberals think this free society just sort of happened, that they can poke and tear at its fabric and things will just go on as before. But they won’t. So at the end of the day, if you want a society governed by the rule of force, you better pray that you’re on the side with the guns and those who know how to use them.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: barack0bama; civilwar2; communistgoals; culturewar; dsj02; homofascism; liarberals; liberals; obamalegacy; obamunism; rulesforradicals; schlichter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

1 posted on 04/05/2015 5:33:41 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
In 30+ years as an active conservative, I’ve never heard people so angry, so frustrated, so fed up.

People have no idea how true the above statement is. I have more than his 30 years of activism.

2 posted on 04/05/2015 5:40:51 AM PDT by MeneMeneTekelUpharsin (Freedom is the freedom to discipline yourself so others don't have to do it for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

He’s correct.


3 posted on 04/05/2015 5:43:39 AM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeneMeneTekelUpharsin

Exactly! We’re DONE. Cruz or Lose, GOP.


4 posted on 04/05/2015 5:47:41 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Sing it, brother...


5 posted on 04/05/2015 5:49:08 AM PDT by Kozak (Walker / Cruz 2016 or Cruz/ Walker 2016 Either one is good...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I still have a BIG PROBLEM with us bombing civilian targets in Belgrade to drive Serbs out of a part of their country. Not much different than us bombing Tel Aviv to drive Israel out of Jerusalem. I also have a strong suspicion that there are TWO SIDES to the story over Kosovo, and he’s only talking one side. If the Albanians there were just peaceful Muslims, that would be a FIRST TIME in world history that they were a majority and accepted non-Muslim rule (look at Lebanon, for example).

The rest of the piece is good, though.


6 posted on 04/05/2015 5:49:11 AM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my home page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“These emotions are supposed to be dissipated by normal political processes. But liberals are bottling them up. And they will blow. It’s only a matter of how.”

Quite possibly by electing Cruz.


7 posted on 04/05/2015 5:50:22 AM PDT by BobL (REPUBLICANS - Fight for the WHITE VOTE...and you will win (see my home page))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It causes a person to wonder if liberals-socialists ever consider that down the road their actions will have unexpected consequences. Perhaps they do otherwise they wouldn’t be so adamant about the removal of all firearms from civilians, so there will be no way to fight back against a corrupt government. History has shown over and over that it has been done before, usually under the guise of a protective and well meaning government, when just the opposite happens to be true.

Once again that’s my take Saintgermaine


8 posted on 04/05/2015 6:04:04 AM PDT by saintgermaine (Is she somehow related)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“And that better worry them, for the coastal elites are uniquely unsuited to a world where force rules instead of law.”

The money quote, IMO.

Another way to put it would be, “Be careful what you wish for, because you might get it.”

Liberals have for many years reminded me of the guy cutting branches off the tree. Except that he’s sitting on the branch and sawing away between himself and the trunk.

They are able to pull the nonsense they do with judicial “reinterpretation” of the Constitution, for example, merely because most of us revere the Constitution.

But every time they do it, they weaken that reverence.


9 posted on 04/05/2015 6:04:44 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
these are the people with most of the guns and the training to use them.

But theirs is the Military, feminized and homosexualized. That sounds wimpy but homosexuals with hatred and guns are operationally very similar to ISIS jihadists in their creative cruelty and sadism. Hitler knew and used that characteristic.

10 posted on 04/05/2015 6:06:15 AM PDT by arthurus (it's true!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
But theirs is the Military, feminized and homosexualized. That sounds wimpy but homosexuals with hatred and guns are operationally very similar to ISIS jihadists in their creative cruelty and sadism. Hitler knew and used that characteristic.

They're also massively outnumbered.

11 posted on 04/05/2015 6:13:54 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
That village behind me wasn’t blown up by explosives. That damage was done by people, with picks and shovels and bare hands.

Dang.

12 posted on 04/05/2015 6:15:53 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Be afraid only of thoughtlessness and pusillanimity." ~ Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saintgermaine
It causes a person to wonder if liberals-socialists ever consider that down the road their actions will have unexpected consequences.

I think that is the essence of Liberalism -- "I take this position because it makes me feel good about myself today. I really don't care if there are unintended consequences, why bother to think about tomorrow?"

13 posted on 04/05/2015 6:18:16 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I just can’t see our military turning their guns on American citizens - their own family, neighbors, friends.


14 posted on 04/05/2015 6:18:47 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Not many queers join the military, regardless of new rules. Those that do aren’t going to be the coastal metro all done up with a pedicure and an oily haircut that you can spot a mile away, without looking at the wrist, body movements, or hearing their speech.

Even if they were that type you think around what I estimate to be between .5%-1% of the entire American population can do much against 60-70% of the rest? Probably .005%-.010% of the total military. The rest are born in the midwest, raised by Americans. They are a super super minority, a micro minority.


15 posted on 04/05/2015 6:21:21 AM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

Kent State.


16 posted on 04/05/2015 6:21:43 AM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Who is this guy? I love this guy...he just said everything I’ve been thinking.


17 posted on 04/05/2015 6:23:34 AM PDT by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Good piece. Expresses what a lot of people are quietly thinking.
When that majority loses its respect for the "rule of law" according to liberals, there is going to be a lot of squealing pigs on the butcher's block.
18 posted on 04/05/2015 6:24:38 AM PDT by Tench_Coxe (For every Allende, there is a Pinochet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

Overly enthusiastic officers who want to crush American patriotism are likely to get fragged.


19 posted on 04/05/2015 6:24:50 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bookmark.


20 posted on 04/05/2015 6:28:23 AM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson