Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RAND FIRES AT RUBIO, GRAHAM: VOTES WERE ‘FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE AND DANGEROUS TO THE COUNTRY’ FOR...
Breitbart ^ | Matthew Boyle

Posted on 03/27/2015 1:35:59 AM PDT by z taxman

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) fired at Sens. Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), among others, calling their ideas “fiscally irresponsible and dangerous to the country” and “just as bad as the Democrats” after they voted to raise defense spending on Thursday without offsetting that with spending cuts to discretionary federal programs.

Paul had introduced an amendment that would have raised defense spending, but offset that increase with cuts elsewhere, such as the Departments of Education, Energy and Commerce. That amendment competed with an amendment from Rubio that would have increased defense spending with no offsetting spending cuts—just a blanket increase in spending.

Paul’s amendment failed 96-4, and Rubio’s amendment—introduced alongside Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR)—failed as well, 32-68.

Paul’s amendment would have increased defense spending by $190 billion over the next two years, but offset it entirely with spending cuts. Rubio’s would have increased defense spending by nearly $190 billion over the next two years but would not have paid for the increase with any spending cuts—meaning that that $190 billion over two years would have been added to the deficit.

One of the biggest advocates for Rubio’s plan over Paul’s was Graham, something that highlights an interesting breakdown between potential 2016 presidential candidates. It’s also worth noting that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX)—who just declared earlier this week he’s running for president in 2016—voted with Rubio, Cotton and Graham but not for the Paul amendment. ...

Paul added that it is “real problem” that so many Republicans across the party talk about cutting wasteful spending and how they’re concerned about the national debt and the deficit, but then turn around and vote to add to it.

“You have to be willing to actually put the cuts forward or you’re just as bad as the Democrats on this,” Paul said.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Arkansas; US: Florida; US: Kentucky; US: South Carolina; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016election; agitprop; arkansas; defensespending; disarmament; election2016; florida; homosexualagenda; kentucky; liberaltarian; libertarians; lindseygraham; marcorubio; medicalmarijuana; paultardation; paultardnoisemachine; paultards; professionaltroll; randnesty; randpaul; randpaulnoisemachine; randsconcerntrolls; southcarolina; tedcruz; texas; tomcotton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last
I'm all for Cruz but this was a bad decision...
1 posted on 03/27/2015 1:35:59 AM PDT by z taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: z taxman

Good guy, BAD guy... Rope-A-Dope..
From the same guys that RE-elected Boehner and McConnell..

Whom have financed Obama from the beginning..
Bait and Switch... republicans are so damned gullible..
Democrats KNOW the malfeasance they are performing.. ON PURPOSE.. not gullible but complicit..

However; some republicans are also complicit..


2 posted on 03/27/2015 1:51:29 AM PDT by hosepipe (" This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole.. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

Is Rand a little bit unstable? It seems that way.


3 posted on 03/27/2015 1:59:21 AM PDT by 9thLife ("Life is a military endeavor..." -- Pope Francis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9thLife

What’s unstable about saying that the defense budget shouldn’t be raised without cutting other budgets to compensate?


4 posted on 03/27/2015 2:17:26 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

That may be your explanation on Rand but this particular proposal was much better than Rubio’s... Wonder why Cruz didn’t support it.


5 posted on 03/27/2015 2:45:34 AM PDT by z taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 9thLife

I don’t know. But this was actually a good amendment on his part. Offsetting spending with cuts is as fiscally conservative as it gets.


6 posted on 03/27/2015 2:45:34 AM PDT by z taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

I agree.


7 posted on 03/27/2015 3:04:14 AM PDT by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

I guess we’re all armchair Senators here - I can’t comment on this without knowing what all was in that bill. Too often we rush to judgment without having all the facts.


8 posted on 03/27/2015 3:20:46 AM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

Rand’s bill was Kabuki Theater. That’s why Cruz opposed it. He knew the RINOs and Rats would never support it and it would delay critical funding for our military.


9 posted on 03/27/2015 3:56:14 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (GO BUCKY GO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

More like he is just like most other pubs when it comes to fiscal matters all talk no action. Since he supported raising the debt further puts him with the RINOs.


10 posted on 03/27/2015 4:09:36 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

Welcome to FR.


11 posted on 03/27/2015 4:17:00 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson

Joined yesterday and all your posts criticize Ted Cruz. You obviously HATE Latinos... : p

Gentlemen, cleanup in aisle 7?


12 posted on 03/27/2015 4:20:56 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman; Caipirabob; Darksheare; shibumi

Okay, so you signed up yesterday, and not only are you bashing Cruz, but you also advocate Son Of Paul?

We got a weerd smell here, ganag...


13 posted on 03/27/2015 4:42:12 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

DO NOT TRUST RAND PAUL!™


14 posted on 03/27/2015 5:04:21 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

Rand, is that you?


15 posted on 03/27/2015 5:05:08 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman; Old Sarge; humblegunner; Darksheare; TheOldLady; 50mm
Hey, n00bie!

(IBTZ)


16 posted on 03/27/2015 5:14:18 AM PDT by shibumi ("Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman; Old Sarge; Darksheare; TheOldLady
Hey, wait a minute!
I know you!

In a former life you were Ron Paul's loose eyebrow - Right?!?

17 posted on 03/27/2015 5:21:02 AM PDT by shibumi ("Vampire Outlaw of the Milky Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

Welcome to FR...again.


18 posted on 03/27/2015 5:34:18 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z taxman

Kaled, Dalek is that you?


19 posted on 03/27/2015 5:37:46 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I’ll qualify by saying I’ve got no skin in the game, as of yet....But, a battle fought that will always be won is better (somehow) than a battle not won (nor fought)?? Wow, talk about ‘leadership’ qualities.


20 posted on 03/27/2015 6:35:37 AM PDT by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson