Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Angelina Jolie has ovaries, fallopian tubes removed to cut cancer risk
CNN ^ | 3/24 | Laura SMith Spark

Posted on 03/24/2015 8:21:02 AM PDT by TangledUpInBlue

Two years after she underwent a double mastectomy to cut her cancer risk, actress and U.N. envoy Angelina Jolie has had surgery to remove her ovaries and fallopian tubes for the same reason, she wrote in The New York Times on Tuesday.

Jolie, 39, carries a mutation of the BRCA1 gene, which sharply increases her risk of developing breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Her mother was diagnosed with the latter at age 49 and died seven years later.

In her New York Times op-ed Tuesday, Jolie said she had been planning the latest preventive surgery for some time.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chat; jolie; ovariancancer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: Pilgrim's Progress
All she has to look forward to is growing up looking like her mom.

Or Webb Hubbell.

101 posted on 03/24/2015 9:09:48 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: smalltownslick

We need some MDs on this thread. My understanding is the BRAC1 gene is specific as an indicator of high risk for breast cancer, not other types of cancer. If that is accurate, a double mastectomy does eliminate the risk.


102 posted on 03/24/2015 9:10:41 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

A serious case of Carp Mouth.


103 posted on 03/24/2015 9:10:43 AM PDT by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Thanks. Just curious.


104 posted on 03/24/2015 9:13:49 AM PDT by smalltownslick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Truth29; Mom MD

MomMD can you perhaps lend some insight on this thread?


105 posted on 03/24/2015 9:16:02 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

A popular local TV newswoman here did the same thing.

She also frequently speaks of her “deep and abiding Christian faith”.

Maybe it’s just me, but I have difficulty reconciling the two. “You’re an awesome God, other than all of these defective parts you’ve palmed-off on me....yadda yadda.”


106 posted on 03/24/2015 9:22:14 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

well I suppose as the Christian scientists do, we could just attempt to pray away disease; or we could let God work through the medical professionals in whose hands we place ourselves? I don’t see the two as irreconcilable.


107 posted on 03/24/2015 9:24:41 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

She seems to be dismantling her female self, this must have some sort of psychological effect, I wonder how it affects her thinking and view of the world?


108 posted on 03/24/2015 9:28:52 AM PDT by ansel12 (Palin--Mr President, the only thing that stops a bad guy with a nuke is a good guy with a nuke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

I think she carries a gene that yields a 85% chance of cancer.


109 posted on 03/24/2015 9:44:28 AM PDT by Verbosus (/* No Comment */)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

......because we are supposed to, apparently, be wrapped up in her life.

Because she is an attention whore, “look at me, I took out a whole page ad”. Or maybe because she wants to remind us peons of the excellent health care and options available to her. Can you imagine any women fighting with her insurance carrier to voluntarily have her ovaries/fallopian tubes/breasts removed? I don’t have a problem with her removing any body parts she chooses. She would be a wonderful advocate for women’s cancer and cancer prevention yet chooses not to. That part seems hypocritical.


110 posted on 03/24/2015 9:47:40 AM PDT by mouse1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Smedley

Many years ago my wife had a friend whose mother, aunts, and sisters all had breast cancer and most of them had died from it. She decided that she didn’t want to face the same fate. At that time it was very difficult to find a doctor who would do it. After they removed her breasts they found in the biopsies that she already had developing breast cancer. She is still alive.


111 posted on 03/24/2015 9:52:34 AM PDT by fireman15 (Check your facts before making ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Not sure what the latest research is. The intent may be to remove all estrogen production as some breast cancers are definitely estrogen sensitive. But that is only a guess


112 posted on 03/24/2015 9:56:16 AM PDT by Mom MD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

Removing her bones will lessen the chance of bone cancer.
Man, she is kooked.


113 posted on 03/24/2015 9:56:34 AM PDT by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John S Mosby

And you know this how???


114 posted on 03/24/2015 10:00:58 AM PDT by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

A freemartin. Hat tip to Huxley.


115 posted on 03/24/2015 10:01:50 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Wealthy people do not usually carry health insurance. Most might have a catastrophic but often just self insure.


116 posted on 03/24/2015 10:03:15 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftist totalitarian fascism is on the move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

My mother had breast cancer, a mastectomy, radiation, and chemo. She survived — until she got cancer in her other breast five years later, got another mastectomy, got more radiation, and more chemo. She did not survive the second round.


117 posted on 03/24/2015 10:10:31 AM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TangledUpInBlue

Wonder what she would do....if her mom had had brain cancer?


118 posted on 03/24/2015 10:11:46 AM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Micro-surgery?


119 posted on 03/24/2015 10:15:49 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup

Perhaps she decided to go public with all of this because she knew she would NOT be able to keep it quiet. One way or another, her medical records would be leaked/sold to the tabloids and she wanted to avoid that.

I remember when Farrah Fawcett was dying of cancer, her medical records were sold to one of the tabloids by a hospital employee (who has since died via, I think, suicide).

True, this will be all over the tabloids anyway, but I think Angelina was wise to speak out and perhaps take some of the wind out of the tabloid’s sails.


120 posted on 03/24/2015 10:24:33 AM PDT by Radagast the Fool (At my signal, UNLEASH PALIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson