Posted on 03/13/2015 6:12:27 PM PDT by Kaslin
In an upcoming interview with Vice News, President Obama said he was “embarrassed” for Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK)–and other Senate Republicans–who signed a letter to Iran, warning that “the next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen” (via NPR):
resident Barack Obama: The VICE News Interview (Trailer)
President Obama said he's "embarrassed" for the 47 Republican senators who tried to undercut nuclear talks with Iran by writing a letter directly to the Iranian leadership.
"For them to address a letter to the Ayatollah, who they claim is our mortal enemy, and their basic argument to them is, 'Don't deal with our president because you can't trust him to follow through on an agreement,' that's close to unprecedented," Obama said in an interview with Vice News.
The youth-oriented news outlet released an excerpt of the interview on Friday. The full conversation is to be released Monday.
First, the letter by Sen. Cotton doesn’t say you can’t trust the president. It details the functions of our constitutional system, how Congress ratifies treaties, and term limits for the president and members of the Senate. It does say, “Anything not approved by Congress is a mere executive agreement.” Hence, the next president and stroke of pen references towards the end of the letter.
Also, let’s not forget that President Obama also sent a letter to Ayatollah Khameni about fighting ISIS last November. Oh, and it was a secret letter (via WSJ):
President Barack Obama secretly wrote to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the middle of last month and described a shared interest in fighting Islamic State militants in Iraq and Syria, according to people briefed on the correspondence.
The letter appeared aimed both at buttressing the campaign against Islamic State and nudging Iran’s religious leader closer to a nuclear deal.
Mr. Obama stressed to Mr. Khamenei that any cooperation on Islamic State was largely contingent on Iran reaching a comprehensive agreement with global powers on the future of Tehran’s nuclear program by a Nov. 24 diplomatic deadline, the same people say.
Moreover, Tim Mak over at the Daily Beast wrote that the Obama administration may have fallen into a Republican trap over the letter; they had to admit any deal with Iran would be non-binding:
The Obama administration was so outraged with the Republican attempt to undercut the president’s foreign policy negotiations that it sent the Vice President, the White House press secretary, and others to attack the letter rather seriously—instead of treating as the “cheeky” reminder of Congress’ role that GOP senators intended.
In the process of engaging, the Obama administration highlighted that any deal with Iran would be, like many other past international security initiatives, a “non-binding” agreement. And by taking this bait, the administration undercut its own credibility in making longer-term assurances about American sanctions relief.
“A non-binding agreement with Iran is easier to make (because the President can clearly do it on his own) and easier to break (because there is no domestic or international legal obstacle to breaking it),” wrote Jack Goldsmith, a former Assistant Attorney General who now teaches law at Harvard, at Lawfare on Wednesday.
…
Some Republicans thought twice about whether the open Iran letter was a needless agitation that hurts bipartisan Congressional efforts to prevent a bad nuclear deal.
But several days after its release, the effect of the open letter has been to clarify how precarious a deal with Iran could be after January 2017.
This raises questions about the durability of a deal that President Obama has said could have Iran agreeing to roll back its nuclear capabilities “for 10 years or longer.”
Whatever you may feel about the letter, it certainly wasn't a communiqué telling Iran to distrust president. Now, was it violation of the Logan Act? First, it's an old law; it was enacted in 1799. It's constitutionally questionable, and the text suggests that what Sen. Cotton did wasn't a violation. But, besides all that, the DOJ isn't going to prosecute 47 members of the Senate, which makes this whole debate over this very arcane law nonsensical. In fact, the last time the Logan Act was used in a serious legal manner was in 1803.
H/T Weekly Standard
Caption: Top and Bottom walk hand in hand on the beach.
He’s an International embarrassment, even to the dumbest ragheads. Interestingly, not to some RINO congressmen though.
I’m going to rename our “Dear President” the ‘Mouth of Sauron’ because all this guy ever does is spew filth/lies.
It would be the equivalent of the beginnings of a second civil war, one in which the libs would lose.
Don't let anyone deceive you in any way,
For this reasonBTTT!
Who cares what you think, you’re an America hating muslem arming piece of crap.
I’m embarrassed that the president of the United States is a lie-a-minute Sunni Muslim.
I wish all 100 of them had signed the letter.
Springtime for Obama...
..... In fact His Royal Heinous Kerry stated emphatically that Iran entered the negotiations knowing that all negotiations and aggreements would be absolutely NONBINDING! ..... And all you hear is crickets chirping from the media ...... sheeeeeesh.
Deal with it, your Highness.
HighLowness.
That’s the difference between the Kenyan and us Americans. We’re embarrassed that those American Senators had to send it.
America is embarrassed because of Obama.
He should be embarrassed if he saw his wife on Ellen Degeneres.
B-HO, BY YOUR NATURE, YOU ARE EMBARRASSED. IT’S WHAT DRIVES YOUR NEED TO BE ‘LIKED’ AND YOUR PATHOLOGICAL LYING TO BE LIKED AND MOVE AHEAD IN LIFE. EMBARRASSMENT IS YOUR WEAKNESS AND IT WAS NOT EXPLOITED EARLY ENOUGH OR CLEARLY ENOUGH BECAUSE, UNFORTUNATELY, WE LIVE IN AN ERA WHERE OTHER NARCISSISTS CAN IDENTIFY WITH YOU AND WHERE THE OTHER “GUILTERBATORS” IN OUR COUNTRY EMBRACE NOT YOUR CHARACTER BUT YOUR COLOR; THE HALF THAT IS BLACK - YET NOW, POLITICALLY AND DEVASTATINGLY “RELEVANT”.
MARTIN LUTHER KING DIED IN VAIN...
AND YOU ARE TO BLAME.
I’m embarrassed that this is what we have for a president.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.