Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: I’m ‘Embarrassed’ For Those 47 Senators Who Sent That Letter to Iran
Townhall.com ^ | March 13, 2015 | Matt Vespa

Posted on 03/13/2015 6:12:27 PM PDT by Kaslin

In an upcoming interview with Vice News, President Obama said he was “embarrassed” for Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK)–and other Senate Republicans–who signed a letter to Iran, warning that “the next president could revoke such an executive agreement with the stroke of a pen” (via NPR):

resident Barack Obama: The VICE News Interview (Trailer)

President Obama said he's "embarrassed" for the 47 Republican senators who tried to undercut nuclear talks with Iran by writing a letter directly to the Iranian leadership.

"For them to address a letter to the Ayatollah, who they claim is our mortal enemy, and their basic argument to them is, 'Don't deal with our president because you can't trust him to follow through on an agreement,' that's close to unprecedented," Obama said in an interview with Vice News.

The youth-oriented news outlet released an excerpt of the interview on Friday. The full conversation is to be released Monday.

First, the letter by Sen. Cotton doesn’t say you can’t trust the president. It details the functions of our constitutional system, how Congress ratifies treaties, and term limits for the president and members of the Senate. It does say, “Anything not approved by Congress is a mere executive agreement.” Hence, the next president and stroke of pen references towards the end of the letter.

Also, let’s not forget that President Obama also sent a letter to Ayatollah Khameni about fighting ISIS last November. Oh, and it was a secret letter (via WSJ):

President Barack Obama secretly wrote to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the middle of last month and described a shared interest in fighting Islamic State militants in Iraq and Syria, according to people briefed on the correspondence.

The letter appeared aimed both at buttressing the campaign against Islamic State and nudging Iran’s religious leader closer to a nuclear deal.

Mr. Obama stressed to Mr. Khamenei that any cooperation on Islamic State was largely contingent on Iran reaching a comprehensive agreement with global powers on the future of Tehran’s nuclear program by a Nov. 24 diplomatic deadline, the same people say.

Moreover, Tim Mak over at the Daily Beast wrote that the Obama administration may have fallen into a Republican trap over the letter; they had to admit any deal with Iran would be non-binding:

The Obama administration was so outraged with the Republican attempt to undercut the president’s foreign policy negotiations that it sent the Vice President, the White House press secretary, and others to attack the letter rather seriously—instead of treating as the “cheeky” reminder of Congress’ role that GOP senators intended.

In the process of engaging, the Obama administration highlighted that any deal with Iran would be, like many other past international security initiatives, a “non-binding” agreement. And by taking this bait, the administration undercut its own credibility in making longer-term assurances about American sanctions relief.

“A non-binding agreement with Iran is easier to make (because the President can clearly do it on his own) and easier to break (because there is no domestic or international legal obstacle to breaking it),” wrote Jack Goldsmith, a former Assistant Attorney General who now teaches law at Harvard, at Lawfare on Wednesday.

Some Republicans thought twice about whether the open Iran letter was a needless agitation that hurts bipartisan Congressional efforts to prevent a bad nuclear deal.

But several days after its release, the effect of the open letter has been to clarify how precarious a deal with Iran could be after January 2017.

This raises questions about the durability of a deal that President Obama has said could have Iran agreeing to roll back its nuclear capabilities “for 10 years or longer.”

Whatever you may feel about the letter, it certainly wasn't a communiqué telling Iran to distrust president. Now, was it violation of the Logan Act?  First, it's an old law; it was enacted in 1799. It's constitutionally questionable, and the text suggests that what Sen. Cotton did wasn't a violation.  But, besides all that, the DOJ isn't going to prosecute 47 members of the Senate, which makes this whole debate over this very arcane law nonsensical. In fact, the last time the Logan Act was used in a serious legal manner was in 1803.  

H/T Weekly Standard


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: barack0bama; iran; loganact; senaterepublicans; tomcotton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Kaslin

that’s close to unprecedented,” Obama said
__________________________________________

Jesse Jackson


21 posted on 03/13/2015 6:31:36 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Im embarrassed for my country that not once but TWICE voted for a Commie douche bag who wants Israel wiped off the face of the earth and wants America run by Muslims


22 posted on 03/13/2015 6:32:49 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Take note of who the 7 quisling were. Democrats in R jerseys. Usual suspects.


23 posted on 03/13/2015 6:34:05 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

That arrogant pos occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania is the biggest embarrassment in the entire country


24 posted on 03/13/2015 6:36:13 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Straw man is all he can do.


25 posted on 03/13/2015 6:36:14 PM PDT by ecomcon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Two off those RINOs were my senators


26 posted on 03/13/2015 6:38:33 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

Now House writes Iran letter to Obama on Iran
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3267656/posts

Of course, the drive-by media has forgotten all about Zero’s surrender letter to Khamenei.

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/loveletter/index


27 posted on 03/13/2015 6:39:21 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ecomcon

With a smidgeon of red herring and a daesh of sophistry.


28 posted on 03/13/2015 6:48:20 PM PDT by TigersEye (STONE COLD ZOMBIE SCOURGE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I’m embarrassed to have fxck nuts as a president.


29 posted on 03/13/2015 6:49:26 PM PDT by maddog55 (America Rising a new Civil War II needs to happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

His mouth was moving, so he was lying.


30 posted on 03/13/2015 6:51:04 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle

“...we’re living in a Mel Brooks movie...”

But, they’re supposed to be funny. And, everyone’s in on the joke from the beginning.


31 posted on 03/13/2015 6:51:07 PM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I'm embarrassed Obama is president. I didn't know I had so many dimwitted countrymen and women.
32 posted on 03/13/2015 6:53:05 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

That’s okay.

At least 60 million patriotic Americans are embarrassed by King Barack.


33 posted on 03/13/2015 6:56:17 PM PDT by Iron Munro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Obama is not embarrassed for the 47 Senators and their letter to the mullahs. That's what he says but it is not what he means. Remember, his history is that of a duplicitous liar, so you can't trust a word that he says. What this is really about is that he is upset that this letter has take the limelight and focus off of the narcissist that he is. He wants this to be all about him and when it's not, he can't help but act petulant and whine and pout.

Seriously, the letter is about interjecting some mature adults wisdom and some gravitas into the deal by the senators, because right now we have two incompetent negotiators giving away the entire store to make themselves look important. Two green, wet-behind-the-ears kids (Obama and Kerry) who have been convinced to play strip poker by Iran and are told that they are winning because they are losing all of their clothes. We are in serious trouble with these two loose cannons on the deck of state.

34 posted on 03/13/2015 7:00:04 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How do you think 78% of American’s feel about your sorry @$$ right about now ,,, you are a national disgrace ,, a mere puppet of Geo. Sore@$$ and a total failure of every thing you touch ,,, the biggest liar in the history in U.S. Presidential history !!!!!!!!!!!!

I feel better now ,,, good night . . .


35 posted on 03/13/2015 7:06:42 PM PDT by Lionheartusa1 ()-: 0bamanomics is the equal distribution of adolescent propaganda & indoctrination :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Embarrassed for these senators?Really? What else can he say, when those 49 senators informed the world that the emperor has no clothes? LOL!
36 posted on 03/13/2015 7:10:32 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A psychopath is incapable of embarrassment.


37 posted on 03/13/2015 7:16:56 PM PDT by Slyfox (I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
DOJ isn't going to prosecute 47 members of the Senate...

Although they *really* would like to do so; however, that act would be the equivalent to a Reichstag fire.

38 posted on 03/13/2015 7:17:18 PM PDT by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
With a 40% approval rating one would think that *Obola* would be embarrassed.But to experience embarrassment one must have a conscience.
39 posted on 03/13/2015 7:18:54 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama;A Low Grade Intellect With Even Lower Morals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox
A psychopath is incapable of embarrassment.

Nailed it! Over half the country is ashamed and embarrassed of those living in the White Mosque at 1600 Penn. Ave.

40 posted on 03/13/2015 7:21:58 PM PDT by Boomer (I vote "NO CONFIDENCE" in Boehner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson