Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unenthused Rand Paul Lifelessly Applauds Netanyahu Speech
National Review Online ^ | March 3, 2015 | Brandon Bordelon

Posted on 03/03/2015 9:43:01 AM PST by C19fan

With his outspoken views against foreign aid and a muscular foreign policy, Kentucky Republican Senator Rand Paul was less-than-enthused by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech on the Iranian nuclear threat.

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Israel; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: iran; israel; libtardian; netanyahu; paul; rancidpaul; rantpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: C19fan

The curly headed Sharpton loving one is certainly not the world leader type.


41 posted on 03/03/2015 10:46:11 AM PST by kenmcg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
Isolationist, peacenik Paulette's flapping his limp fish-fins together in mock, slow-mo applause made him stand out like a cartoon character.

CPAC should eliminate the straw poll altogether...it's a charade, below the dignity of serious convening....and it should leave the bussing to Greyhound.

42 posted on 03/03/2015 10:46:47 AM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I saw him. The dude looked like he was stoned.


43 posted on 03/03/2015 10:47:33 AM PST by OKSooner ("Remember Fort Hood, Boston, and Moore, Oklahoma.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I doubt that many of the so called ‘front runners’ are even aware that Pres. Jefferson knew how to handle the Barbary i.e. Muslim Pirates.


44 posted on 03/03/2015 10:54:55 AM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Good Lord! Now we have to attack republicans because they don’t behave perfectly!

How North Korean!!!


45 posted on 03/03/2015 11:23:23 AM PST by vpintheak (Call them what they are - regressive control-freaks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vette6387

They probably heard he supported Witch McConnell for reelection, you know the McConnell who famously promised to “...crush the Tea Party...” Two “winners,” both from the great basketball state of Kentucky....


46 posted on 03/03/2015 11:29:08 AM PST by jennings2004 ("What difference, at this point, does it make!"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Rand Slams Congress for Funding Egypt's Generals: 'How Does Your Conscience Feel Now?'
Sen. Rand Paul is hammering his fellow senators for keeping billions in financial aid flowing to Egypt's military -- even as Cairo's security forces massacre anti-government activists. [by "anti-government activists" is meant church-burning Christian-murdering jihadists]
[Posted on 08/15/2013 5:44:10 PM PDT by Hoodat]

47 posted on 03/03/2015 3:22:49 PM PST by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibertarianLiz

I just received this from The Weekly Standard

Walker in a Walk!

About 3,700 of you voted over the last week in the second installment of our presidential straw poll, selecting your 1st, 2nd, and 3rd choices for the GOP nomination.

The big news is Scott Walker. Walker had won first place by a small margin in January’s poll, winning 18 percent of the ballots in a splintered field (which then included Mitt Romney, who hadn’t yet announced he wasn’t running). Walker has now surged to a dominating position in the new survey, capturing 47 percent of the first choices, and selected as a first, second, or third choice on no less than 78 percent of the ballots (compared to 44 percent last time). Furthermore, in the new poll no one else made into double digits as a first choice, or made it onto as many as a third of the ballots in any position. So (for now!), it’s Walker in a walk.

Here are the complete results. The first number is the percentage the candidate won of 1st place choices, the second is the percentage of the ballots the candidate made it onto as 1st, 2nd, or 3rd choice. (The comparable January #s are in parentheses.)

Walker: 47/78 (18/44)
Cruz: 9/29 (16/35)
Rubio: 8/31 (4/18)
Carson: 7/27 (10/26)
Paul: 7/14 (6/16)
Bush: 6/17 (8/18)
Jindal: 3/21 (3/20)
Perry: 2/16 (3/15)
Kasich: 2/13 (4/15)
Pence: 2/10 (2/9)
Huckabee: 2/7 (3/12)

Fiorina: 1/9 (1/2)
Bolton: 1/8 (3/10)
Christie: 1/4 (2/8)

All the other candidates had one percent or fewer of first place choices, and were mentioned on three percent or fewer of all ballots.

Apart from Walker’s rise, the only notable change from January seems to be some erosion of support for Cruz and an increase for Rubio—and a surprising number of second and third place votes for Fiorina (mentioned on 9 percent of all ballots, more than Huckabee or Christie).

Obviously, this was not a scientific survey but rather a poll of those who chose to participate. Equally obvious, the race is early and seems very fluid. But it’s well known that WEEKLY STANDARD readers are an unusually perceptive, predictive, and prescient bunch! So make of it what you will.


48 posted on 03/04/2015 12:18:54 AM PST by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson