Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/01/2015 9:37:47 AM PST by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Steelfish

No Ms. Valentine YOU are BS.


2 posted on 03/01/2015 9:41:43 AM PST by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

I smell a civil rights setup.


3 posted on 03/01/2015 9:42:06 AM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Precedent— FL Drivers License case— did not allow woman’s photo id with burka/face cover in place... DUH!!

France outlawed the burka, believe.


4 posted on 03/01/2015 9:46:20 AM PST by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Having read the Quran, I can offer this wisdom...there is a complete and absolute waiver within it to do whatever is required to live amongst the unpure or unbelievers (those of us who aren’t Islam). It basically allows you to eat pork, skip prayers, and do whatever is necessary in real life. Obviously, this woman wants to pretend she’s prep’ed up on the Quran, but she isn’t.


5 posted on 03/01/2015 9:46:49 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Sorry, Missy Muslim, but what you practice is no religion. It is a socio-political system masquerading as a religion. No constitutional protections apply.

Just stating what I wish congress would recognize.


6 posted on 03/01/2015 9:49:12 AM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & Ifwater the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Madam, The Court will ask you one more time, and for the last time ,”Would you please take those rags off your head in my courtroom?” Thank you in advance, for your compliance!
As far as I know, in the Courtroom, The Judge is King for the duration of the courtroom session, and he does have that ability to set dress code specifications.


7 posted on 03/01/2015 9:50:37 AM PST by lee martell (The sa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Sorry, I don’t agree with this one, she has a case.


8 posted on 03/01/2015 9:50:49 AM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

9 posted on 03/01/2015 9:51:52 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama;A Low Grade Intellect With Lower Morals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

So if she’s allowed to wear a headscarf to a courtroom, does this mean others can wear their baseball caps, beanies, etc. as well?

Just askin......


10 posted on 03/01/2015 9:52:09 AM PST by Kevin in California
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

If I was Juror I want see her face and hair uncovered maybe I am racist for saying that I don’t care

She could be hiding something in her burka


13 posted on 03/01/2015 9:54:19 AM PST by SevenofNine (We are Freepers, all your media bases belong to us ,resistance is futile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Is a headscarf actually mandated by the Koran?


14 posted on 03/01/2015 9:54:32 AM PST by Politicalkiddo ("He repays everyone for what they have done; He brings on them what their conduct deserves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

On what grounds did he make her remove it?

If this judge can do this, it will be used against Christians very soon.


15 posted on 03/01/2015 9:54:53 AM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
All of these encounters with muslims are nothing less than the old tactics of “probing the perimeter”, “testing the boundaries and defenses of the enemy”, “dry run” tactics, and the quintessential alinsky tactic of “using the enemy’s rules and laws against them”.

If these women want to play the part of agent provocateur, then they should expect to pay the price when their plan goes horribly wrong in enemy territory.

23 posted on 03/01/2015 10:08:50 AM PST by factoryrat (We are the producers, the creators. Grow it, mine it, build it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Hooper of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said the matter does not merely affect Muslims.

“What if you’re a Jewish man wearing a skull cap? What if you’re a Catholic nun wearing a habit?” Hooper asked. “All would be denied access to this judge’s courtroom. We need to know what’s going here and why this has apparently been going on for so long.”

No sympathy here, CAIR wouldn’t care about the Jew or the nun. Sheesh.


26 posted on 03/01/2015 10:12:37 AM PST by Baladas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Granted, I am an old timer, but I remember an era when a well dressed woman would not dare leave home without some form of cover on her head. Understandably, the judge can and should order the face to be uncovered, but removal of a woman’s scarf? I respectfully disagree.


27 posted on 03/01/2015 10:13:04 AM PST by jttpwalsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Hey Lisa, When in Rome... ‘nuff said.


28 posted on 03/01/2015 10:29:58 AM PST by upchuck (The current Federal Governent is what the Founding Fathers tried to prevent. WAKE UP!! Amendment V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish; Husker24; nickcarraway; Kevin in California; Engedi; jttpwalsh
What would a Judge demand of this crowd?


31 posted on 03/01/2015 10:39:16 AM PST by BBell (breathe easy obey the law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

Muslims dont get civil rights. Only deported.


40 posted on 03/01/2015 12:18:24 PM PST by Carry me back (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish
Where the heck did common sense go...

If it was a headscarf and not covering her face, it's ridiculous to ask her to remove her covering ...

If it was a Mennonite women or Amish women with a head covering on, would the same standard be applied..

I somehow doubt it...

She wasn't part of the case...just a mother...

41 posted on 03/01/2015 12:30:03 PM PST by Popman (Christ alone: My Cornerstone...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Steelfish

“She said she refused to remove it and turned to leave, saying, “This is bullshit”.

No her and her criminal wannabe son living in Georgia is BS. They are moving in here like cockroaches. Its all bad.


46 posted on 03/01/2015 5:27:42 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson