Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2015 8:35:45 AM PST by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GIdget2004

Hijabs are offensive.

Anyone who wears one is being rude and insensitive.


2 posted on 02/24/2015 8:37:38 AM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I’m sure she was devastated not getting her dream job. /s


3 posted on 02/24/2015 8:37:39 AM PST by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Apparently, the store chain didn’t have to “ask” her about her religion. She was WEARING it. I would not have hired her either.


4 posted on 02/24/2015 8:38:33 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

I guess she was trying to make the move up from Kiosk worker to the Store Front. I thought I recognized her but then again all berka’s look alike.


5 posted on 02/24/2015 8:39:45 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

If a job you take requires you to wear a CLOWN SUIT as part of the job ... then you’re going to be wearing a clown suit. That’s just the way it goes on a job. You wear (or don’t wear) what is in compliance with the “look” that the job wants to present to the public.


7 posted on 02/24/2015 8:40:42 AM PST by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Companies have a right to hire and fire on whatever basis they want, IMO


8 posted on 02/24/2015 8:41:40 AM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
Didn't wear it during the interview but now says she MUST wear It “for religious reason's”. . .what?. . .is she arguing religion requires her to wear it while working but NOT when interviewing for a job? Wait. . .what? SET-UP!!! Trouble-maker!!

By the way, muslimes are always telling us the wearing of that rag/bag over their head is not required by islam, that it is a choice. . .ergo, NOT a religious requirement.

9 posted on 02/24/2015 8:42:53 AM PST by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
C'mon, we all know how this is going to turn out.

This chick is going to own that Abercrombie store.

10 posted on 02/24/2015 8:44:17 AM PST by OKSooner ("Remember Fort Hood, Boston, and Moore, Oklahoma.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
I wish some Muslim baker somewhere would refuse to make the wedding cake of a gay couple on religious grounds. I would love to see the courts deal with that.

I mean, its clear that Muslims are afforded greater religious rights than Christians. I'd just like to see how the courts would fall over themselves and contort the law to avoid having to admit it.


11 posted on 02/24/2015 8:44:22 AM PST by caligatrux (Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

The Hajib is no more religious than an empty offering plate.


17 posted on 02/24/2015 8:54:57 AM PST by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
Reading deeper into the article, this makes less and less sense.

The article says that Abercrombie "had previously made accommodations — in fact, even for headscarves and yarmulkes" in the past.

So is the lawsuit really about forcing Abercrombie to let employees wear headscarves for religious reasons? I mean, it looks like they already do that.

And I don't think Abercrombie would fight this all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court just to make a point, especially if they have already made the exception for other employees. Its too expensive and too bad for PR to for Abercrombie not to just settle.

There must be some technical legal point that is really driving this. The issue of whether the employee has to affirmatively claim a religious exemption, perhaps. Or something the author just missed.
21 posted on 02/24/2015 8:59:37 AM PST by caligatrux (Rage, rage against the dying of the light.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004
It’s almost over, though. The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments Wednesday and render a decision some time this summer on whether Elauf was a victim of religious discrimination.

No because there is no religious requirement to wear the hijab to work in a Western establishment.

It's a part of the modern Islamist revolution. Middle Eastern countries in the 1960s didn't even have it to mandatory degree of today.

31 posted on 02/24/2015 9:12:12 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Only thing that would make this better is if the store was in the Mall of America...


32 posted on 02/24/2015 9:13:12 AM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

“outgoing and promotes diversity.”

Once again, the sick cancer of “diversity” rears it’s ugly head.

How many lawsuits? How many diversity classes (re-education)?How many rapes? How many murders until Americans realize they are being targeted directly by an onslaught of feral 3rd worlders who will eventually replace them and their children?


34 posted on 02/24/2015 9:18:21 AM PST by Roman_War_Criminal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Why is it that the government considers this possible religious discrimination because this person is following her religious beliefs and is not getting a job because of it. Yet, the government does not consider it religious discrimination when a baker follows her religious beliefs and the government wants to force her to provide a specific service for someone that violates her belief? That is the liberal world for you.


35 posted on 02/24/2015 9:23:35 AM PST by falcon99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Slave garb is not good advertisement for any retail store if they want women to shop there.


37 posted on 02/24/2015 9:37:21 AM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Kind of hard for me to pick sides on this one. On the one hand, I don’t particularly care for Muslims, and I think that having one as an employee is just asking for trouble. But on the other hand, if the girl had been wearing a cross and had been refused employment, I’d be furious at the blatant religious discrimination. But on still another hand, I do believe that companies should have the right to have their employees present themselves in whatever way the company deems proper for their business needs. And on yet another hand, I can’t stand Abercrombie & Fitch and I would laugh gleefully if their business were wrecked.

I think I’ll just toss my hands into the air on this one.


38 posted on 02/24/2015 9:38:52 AM PST by bus man (Loose Lips Sink Ships)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GIdget2004

Why the Sam Hell would anyone ever consider hiring a muslim under any circumstances?


47 posted on 02/24/2015 2:43:18 PM PST by Eaker (You are really amazing Eaker. - Swordmaker 02/14/15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson