I will Accept Your Surrender

Age of Autism ^ | 02/17/15 | Kent Heckenlively

[azkathy]

I Will Accept Your Surrender

White-flagBy Kent Heckenlively

I've made this offer several times in the past. I'm making it again. I am willing to accept the surrender of those who have perverted science, harmed a generation of children, and even as of this late date are willing to harm more children so as to not to upset the balance of their lives.

It must be truly troubling for those who continue to fuel the epidemic of autism and other chronic diseases that even though you still maintain the trust of those in the media, the scientific community, and most of the people in politics, an amazing 39% of the population in a recent Fox News poll believe parents need to have the right to decide how and whether their children can be vaccinated.

You see, I've interviewed enough scientists that I understand the world in which you operate. Although you tremble in fear when you confront the dark questions at the heart of why so many children and adults suffer with chronic diseases, you feel quite comfortable making others cower as has been done to you. It must really annoy you when you fulminate against us as if we were some extremist group, that somehow you can't get the rest of the population to fully buy it.

Oh sure, you can get some lackey journalist to say foolish things, like let's publish the addresses of the parents who have deviated from the CDC approved vaccination schedule, but it's just not having the desired effect. It's a bit like have the beef industry threatening to publish the home addresses of vegetarians.

The typical American is going to watch that and say, "I don't know what to think about vaccinations, but I know a bully when I see one." And then you start to lose them.

Because there are only a few ways this thing can go. You need to keep parents and doctors and scientists like us who share the same concerns off the air, but if you do and keep acting like we're the domestic equivalent of ISIS, people are going to notice. That 39% is where our numbers begin. That's the number who remain unconvinced, despite you having an overwhelming advantage in the media, the journals, and the politicians.

So, the choice is to continue to keep us off the air, watching that 39% increase as people start to notice WHO is not being allowed to speak, or you can risk trying to look BALANCED and actually put us on the air. Either way, you are walking across very thin ice. The public wants to know that children are safe. And 39% of the public doesn't think the the whole story has been told. Are you going to publish the addresses of 39% of the population? I doubt that will win many converts.

Maybe you've been able to push CDC whistleblower, Dr. William Thompson, out of your mind for a while and not think about the THOUSANDS of documents he has turned over to Congressman Bill Posey. Maybe you haven't really thought much about what it means that Dr. Thompson has been granted CONGRESSIONAL IMMUNITY. Maybe you think they give those out like White House tours. And you don't consider the implications of Dr. Thompson having one of the country's best whistleblower attorneys.

Napoleon said that one should never interfere with an enemy when they are in the midst of committing suicide. I'm sure that many people in science believe the CDC is doing that at this very moment. Is that something you want to join? Isn't it time to come clean?

The system you need to defend is one in which a separate court system provides complete immunity for pharmaceutical companies for their vaccines. Think about that. Close your eyes and imagine saying that to somebody like Megyn Kelly and watching how America reacts.

Let's all say it together. I BELIEVE IN A SEPARATE COURT SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES COMPLETE IMMUNITY FOR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES THAT PROVIDE VACCINES TO CHILDREN. I don't think that's going to be a winning slogan. It isn't how you protect children. You protect children by having a legal system which demands that the truth comes out, regardless of who it hurts. That means pharmaceutical companies produce documents, government agencies give us data, and scientists are put under oath. Anything else is a sham.

And so I'm offering you a way out. A complete and unconditional surrender. You can't ask what we're going to do to you. You're just going to have to trust in our good graces. Maybe sometime in the distant future your children and family might believe you had a shred of courage if you act at this very moment. But the time for choosing is drawing near. Choose wisely.

That number for Congressman Bill Posey is (202) 225-3671. I hear they're making their way through the Thompson documents, so if you could help them wrap up a couple loose ends, I'm sure they'd appreciate it. The clock is ticking!

[trebb]

Even if those laws passed, the decision would still be in the hands of the parents, that legislation would just stop them from jeopardizing other children in the public school system.

Sounds sane when stated like that. On the flip side, the public school system, government funded, is being used to force the hands of citizens to the government's will and we are being asked/told to 'trust them" because everyone knows what a kind and gentle ruler the government sees itself as...

[Boogieman]

Nobody is forcing anyone.

[trebb]

Nobody is forcing anyone.

Keep telling yourself that - as you either acquiesce or find yourself able to access fewer and fewer "services".

[Boogieman]

“Keep telling yourself that”

The truth? Why, yes, I think I will keep telling myself the truth.

[azkathy]

This is an interesting article linked here, http://fearlessparent.org/un-informed-consent-whats-going-on-with-merck-co-part-2/ quoting, "BIG PEOPLE NEED SHOTS, TOO We think about vaccines as mostly for children. Adults should know that we will be targeted for a lot more vaccines. Here’s a recent position paper “National Adult Immunization Plan” by the federal National Vaccine Program Office published on 2/5/15. Check out what they have to say about: 2020 “healthy people target levels” by vaccine with separate goals for all adults, healthcare workers, and pregnant women (page 2) expanded use of electronic health records and immunization information systems to collect and track data, and facilitate private medical records across state lines (page 13) engaging employers and faith-based organizations to promote uptake (pp 15, 22) and lots more Corporations like Merck will jump at opportunities to collaborate to increase market penetration and boost earnings. As an example, Merck is implementing a “vaccine adherence” strategy. It is partnering with an electronic health records company to give clinicians real time data access." Read the Plan for Adult Immunizations here. http://fearlessparent.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/national_adult_immunization_plan_final-2-2015.pdf

[azkathy]

Ping to #45

[trebb]

The truth? Why, yes, I think I will keep telling myself the truth.

Which truth is that - the one where the benevolent government and other 'authorities" never force anything on anyone who doesn't want it?

Since you make an open-ended statement as if it is an actual fact (maybe you think "the science is settled"), perhaps you would be kind enough to explain it in non-nuanced clarity so I can drink from the cup too.

[Boogieman]

“Which truth is that - the one where the benevolent government and other ‘authorities” never force anything on anyone who doesn’t want it?”

Don’t put words in my mouth. You were talking about the government forcing people to acquiesce to vaccinations, which is not happening. Nobody is forced to vaccinate their children if they don’t want to.

[goodnesswins]

Interesting....I went to a Diagnostics Imaging place for a DEXA and ultrasound the other day....Intake clerk needed to ask some questions....among them....have you had a flu shot? (I said NEVER!) and have you had a pneumonia shot? No....not yet. Am contemplating it, but getting less likely to get one. And, I’m over 60. I think they are collecting information now through providers....

[trebb]

Don’t put words in my mouth. You were talking about the government forcing people to acquiesce to vaccinations, which is not happening. Nobody is forced to vaccinate their children if they don’t want to.

Then you assert that kids can go to school without getting the vaccinations - one of my assertions was that folks are forced to either acquiesce or to forego certain 'services". You pretty much said that isn't true and I responded. Now you claim I put words in your mouth because you chose to ignore my premise due to it not fitting your preferred meme.

[Boogieman]

“Then you assert that kids can go to school without getting the vaccinations...”

Nope, only that nobody is forcing them. What you seem to be arguing is, in fact, that all the other kids should be forcibly put into danger.

“...one of my assertions was that folks are forced to either acquiesce or to forego certain ‘services”.”

No, you didn’t say that. You said:

“On the flip side, the public school system, government funded, is being used to force the hands of citizens to the government’s will and we are being asked/told to ‘trust them” because everyone knows what a kind and gentle ruler the government sees itself as... “

No conditions there, no “or”. It’s an unconditional statement.

[papertyger]

You see, I've interviewed enough scientists that I understand the world in which you operate. Although you tremble in fear when you confront the dark questions at the heart of why so many children and adults suffer with chronic diseases, you feel quite comfortable making others cower as has been done to you.

Physicians don't get to wear the mantle of "science" when they present their "professional opinion" like a history professor.

[azkathy]

It is odd, why would they need to know if you had the shots prior to DEXA and Ultrasound? (perhaps you might glow or something due to the aluminum/metals in the shot?? ;)

I am sure through Obamacare they have lot’s of provisions for tracking medical information. Last month I got prescriptions for pneumonia and I had to sign-electronically for them-the clerk said it had to do with the “Affordable Care Act.”