Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Paul Introduces Bipartisan Bill to Restore Voting Rights to Ex-Criminals
MRCTV ^ | 02/13/2014 | Monica Sanchez

Posted on 02/14/2015 5:58:44 PM PST by thetallguy24

en. Rand Paul (R-KY) re-introduced the Civil Rights Voting Restoration Act of 2015 on Friday, a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) that would restore federal voting rights for non-violent, “low-level” ex-offenders.

Sen. Paul explained,

“A criminal record is currently one of the biggest impediments to voting in federal elections. The Civil Rights Voting Restoration Act will reform existing federal law and give low-level ex-offenders another opportunity to vote.”

Non-violent, so-called "low-level" crimes include:

Whether a crime is considered a misdemeanor or felony will depend on a variety of aggravating factors, such as the number of offenses, economic impact, and so on.

Dependent upon the type of conviction, voting rights for ex-offenders also vary from state to state.

For instance, in Maine, the right to vote is never taken away, even when imprisoned.

(Excerpt) Read more at mrctv.org ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: cantbepresident; conservative; crime; kentucky; randpaul; randsconcerntrolls; teaparty; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Is Paul seriously going insane? First, he buddies up with Sharpton, now teams with Reid.

He will never get my vote. Nutty as his dad.

1 posted on 02/14/2015 5:58:44 PM PST by thetallguy24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Once again, Mr small government states rights ignores the powers reserved to the individual states.


2 posted on 02/14/2015 6:04:24 PM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

The whole family iis NOT WORTH THEIT SALT!


3 posted on 02/14/2015 6:06:05 PM PST by SandRat (Duty - Honor - Country! What else need s said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
Rand Paul: Time for GOP to soften war stance
...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.
[Posted on 01/31/2013 5:08:50 PM PST by xzins]
Rand Paul's immigration speech
...The Republican Party must embrace more legal immigration.

Unfortunately, like many of the major debates in Washington, immigration has become a stalemate-where both sides are imprisoned by their own rhetoric or attachment to sacred cows that prevent the possibility of a balanced solution.

Immigration Reform will not occur until Conservative Republicans, like myself, become part of the solution. I am here today to begin that conversation.

Let's start that conversation by acknowledging we aren't going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants.

If you wish to work, if you wish to live and work in America, then we will find a place for you...

This is where prudence, compassion and thrift all point us toward the same goal: bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society.

Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors.
[Posted on 03/19/2013 7:04:07 AM PDT by Perdogg]
Rand Paul calls on conservatives to embrace immigration reform
Latinos, should be a natural constituency for the party, Paul argued, but "Republicans have pushed them away with harsh rhetoric over immigration." ...he would create a bipartisan panel to determine how many visas should be granted for workers already in the United States and those who might follow... [and the buried lead] "Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers...
[Posted on 04/21/2013 1:52:42 PM PDT by SoConPubbie]
[but he's not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]

4 posted on 02/14/2015 6:09:53 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

He’s gone nuts this last year. Wacko. Crazy. Loco. Insane. Bonkers.


5 posted on 02/14/2015 6:11:21 PM PST by faithhopecharity ((Brilliant, Profound Tag Line Goes Here, just as soon as I can think of one..).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

This will disenfranchise the illegal alien vote!


6 posted on 02/14/2015 6:17:14 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (If obama speaks and there is no one there to hear it, is it still a lie?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Did not realize he had such a large prison following.
He is insane.


7 posted on 02/14/2015 6:18:04 PM PST by funfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24
The 14th amendment clearly implies that the states have the right to deny the right to vote on the basis of conviction for a crime. (It was originally put in there to allow disfranchisement of former Confederates.)

Not that Congress pays any attention to what the Constitution says...

8 posted on 02/14/2015 6:21:27 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Of course this is the most pressing issue of our time.

The “Democrat Voter Restoration Act”


9 posted on 02/14/2015 6:22:26 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

+1

I don’t really disagree with the idea that low level and non-recidivist offenders should not be disenfranchised for life. But it’s none of the Federal Government’s business. The states should resolve that on their own.


10 posted on 02/14/2015 6:30:49 PM PST by NRx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Rand Paul is a complete idiot when it comes to politics. The only people supporting this loser are IMHO losertarians and low-information/easily duped “conservatives”.


11 posted on 02/14/2015 6:33:22 PM PST by House Atreides (CRUZ or lose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

I’m a former felon legal voter and I say the feds need to stay the hell out of it.

Paul talks a lot of libertarian BS while pandering for bigger government.


12 posted on 02/14/2015 6:35:19 PM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

apparently the acorn doesn’t fall very far from the tree


13 posted on 02/14/2015 6:36:07 PM PST by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24
Paul has always been slightly off, IMHO, but the restoration of voting rights for ex-cons is truly an issue that deserves serious consideration.

Just not at the federal level.

Each state has their own laws, which is as it should be.

14 posted on 02/14/2015 6:39:48 PM PST by sarasmom (Je suis Charlie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Mr small government states rights ignores the powers reserved to the individual states.”

Not the biggest fan of Rand Paul and definitely do not think criminals should be voting, but I want ALL gubmints to have as little power as possible. State gubmints are the third most evil entities after the UN and the Federal gubmint.


15 posted on 02/14/2015 6:45:50 PM PST by sagar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thetallguy24

Another intrusion on what should be a state’s issue.


16 posted on 02/14/2015 6:47:57 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sagar

The constitution says its up to the states.

The end.


17 posted on 02/14/2015 6:48:38 PM PST by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NRx
I don’t really disagree with the idea that low level and non-recidivist offenders should not be disenfranchised for life.

Agree.

But it’s none of the Federal Government’s business.

Agree.

The states should resolve that on their own.

Three for three!

18 posted on 02/14/2015 6:50:09 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sagar; BillyBoy

Word.


19 posted on 02/14/2015 6:55:19 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; sagar; sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy; fieldmarshaldj; ...
Once again, Mr small government states rights ignores the powers reserved to the individual states.

That's not the problem. I would welcome federal legislation to mandate voter ID for example, states have no right to let illegal aliens vote and it would be entirely appropriate for the federal government to protect the civil right of it's citizens by preventing that.

The problem is this bill would be better titled the "The more votes for democrats act". Paul is a retard like his pappy and fellow travelers.

20 posted on 02/14/2015 6:59:47 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson