Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Navy's 6th Generation Fighter Jets Will Be Slow and Unstealthy
The National Interest ^ | Feb 5th, 2015 | Zachary Keck

Posted on 02/05/2015 3:59:46 PM PST by Mariner

The U.S. Navy’s next generation air superiority fighter will not be “super-duper fast” or employ much in the way of stealth, a senior navy official announced on Wednesday.

Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jonathan Greenert, the Navy’s top officer, divulged some details about the Navy’s so-called Next Generation Air Dominance F/A-XX fighter jet during a speech at an industry conference.

“I don’t see that it’s going to be super-duper fast, because you can’t outrun missiles.” Greenert said, the Washington Examiner reported. “And you can’t become so stealthy that you become invisible — you are going to generate a signature of some sort,” he also noted, adding “You know that stealth may be overrated…. If something moves fast through the air and disrupts molecules in the air and puts out heat – I don’t care how cool the engine can be – it’s going to be detectable.”

(Excerpt) Read more at nationalinterest.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: navy; stealth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
While it's good we keep working on future generations of weapons, it should be known that our CURRENT fleet of F-15c can STILL defeat any other nations' best and newest.

We don't even need the F-22's to win.

But it's good to have them. Just in case.

1 posted on 02/05/2015 3:59:46 PM PST by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Obama is going to bring back bi-planes soon enough


2 posted on 02/05/2015 4:01:35 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

It sounds defeatest. The real answer is, “we can’t afford to be the far and away most technilogically advanced military in the world anymore.”


3 posted on 02/05/2015 4:01:52 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (POPOF. President Of Pants On Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Obama is going to bring back bi-planes soon enough

Well, either bi or LGBT-planes.

4 posted on 02/05/2015 4:03:03 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Sorry, I should have said queer-planes.


5 posted on 02/05/2015 4:03:47 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Celebrate "Republicans Freed the Slaves Month")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

lol

I should have saw that coming.


6 posted on 02/05/2015 4:04:43 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

F-15’s are being sent to Tyndall AFB in Florida, being refitted and equipped to fly by remote control, tails being repainted day glow orange with matching stripes, and then flown by remote control about 70 miles off the Gulf coast to be shot down as target practice for F22 and F35’s.


7 posted on 02/05/2015 4:07:01 PM PST by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

I guess they finally ran out of Phantoms.


8 posted on 02/05/2015 4:18:13 PM PST by Afterguard (Liberals will let you do anything you want, as long as it's mandatory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Why don’t we just let F-22s do covert training in the ME and Asia? They can shoot down real enemies and never be discovered. Taht’s what Russia does.


9 posted on 02/05/2015 4:20:03 PM PST by Tenacious 1 (POPOF. President Of Pants On Fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Bigger, Slower, More expensive, just like the Pentagon likes it.


10 posted on 02/05/2015 4:21:42 PM PST by Usagi_yo (It's not possible to give success. Only opportunity. Success is earned on it's own right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo
F35="Bigger, Slower, More expensive"
11 posted on 02/05/2015 4:25:43 PM PST by jpsb (Believe nothing until it has been officially denied)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

How about we not worry about gen6, and stick with the F-22, which works in a pretty scary way.


12 posted on 02/05/2015 4:25:44 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

National Interest is a SATIRE site folks


13 posted on 02/05/2015 4:25:52 PM PST by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Afterguard

There are still a few Phantoms flying around Tyndall without the paint. (Yet)


14 posted on 02/05/2015 4:26:52 PM PST by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

The article definitely did not seem to be satirical, and the same news is on other websites.


15 posted on 02/05/2015 4:31:41 PM PST by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
New model of fighter being tested.


16 posted on 02/05/2015 4:34:04 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

No, it is not a satire site.


17 posted on 02/05/2015 4:36:52 PM PST by IndispensableDestiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

For a moment I thought he was describing an A-10. But they just retired the last A-10s. Stupid $hits.


18 posted on 02/05/2015 4:37:52 PM PST by ConservativeInPA (#JuSuisCharlesMartel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

> The U.S. Navy’s next generation air superiority fighter will not be “super-duper fast” or employ much in the way of stealth,...

Sounds a lot like an A-10. ;-)


19 posted on 02/05/2015 4:42:16 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeInPA

They are talking about hi tech weapons instead of speed and stealth. Less defense, more offense. One idea I’ve had: Suppose you can beam a virus onto a wired network? Induction is a known EM phenomenon. Suppose you got the ability to induce voltages SO PRECISELY that you could simulate a bit of computer code, and plant it on a network? Without complete faraday-caging absolutely everywhere, it could work, and there would be little by way of defense.


20 posted on 02/05/2015 4:44:15 PM PST by Lazamataz (With friends like Boehner, we don't need Democrats. -- Laz A. Mataz, 2015)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson