Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

7 Percent Of LGBT Community Opposes Same-Sex Marriage, Survey Finds
CBS 5KPIX CBS SF Bay Area ^ | January 29, 2015 12:29 PM | CBS 5KPIX CBS SF Bay Area

Posted on 01/31/2015 3:07:42 AM PST by WhiskeyX

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS SF) – Those who identify as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgender aren’t universal in their support of their own right to marry, according to a survey from the Pew Research Center.

The survey found that, while support is overwhelming in all segments of the community, seven percent of a nationally-representative sample said they oppose same-sex marriage.

(Excerpt) Read more at sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; lgbt; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 01/31/2015 3:07:42 AM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

If you broke this up into the L, G, B, T groups...we might find that the seven percent came from one particular group. Course, the media wouldn’t be bright enough to ask the next question.


2 posted on 01/31/2015 3:10:09 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

The 7% probably didn’t understand the question.


3 posted on 01/31/2015 3:46:54 AM PST by Tax-chick ("It's always a longer trip when you defy God." ~ Msgr. Charles Pope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Marriage belongs to the straight world and gays should not change it (by a gay person) (2005)

Live link to article at post #74

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1517040/posts?page=74#74


4 posted on 01/31/2015 3:56:45 AM PST by kanawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Because they see it as a construct, and dont want to be expected to “settle” with one person.


5 posted on 01/31/2015 4:24:37 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

A lesbian once told me she didn’t want her relationship defined by ‘breeders’. She had no interest in ‘marriage’.

All in all, government needs to get out of marriage.


6 posted on 01/31/2015 4:47:40 AM PST by tje
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tje

This used to be the overwhelming consensus, but then the SSM craze stole most of their hearts. Not to actually get SSM’d in most cases (only a minority will), but just to have it exist, out of principle.

Gay really is about pride. That’s why it cannot stop the monkeyshines.


7 posted on 01/31/2015 4:49:54 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I don’t see any particular reason to suppose they lied or misunderstood. It’s been so thoroughly socialized among them that even living under a rock they would have known.

This is at a political level, of course, and they are talking about the new institution in general, not personally.

At a personal level, if asked if they foresaw or had a desire to enter into such a relationship themselves, the response would be affirmative only in the minority.


8 posted on 01/31/2015 4:53:11 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

There is lot of money at stake in “gay marriage”; if a twenty-something homo dies from AIDS, a “spouse” could conceivably collect SS survivor benefits for decades.


9 posted on 01/31/2015 4:58:57 AM PST by kearnyirish2 (Affirmative action is economic warfare against white males (and therefore white families).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: kearnyirish2

At best I’ll wait to see if it pans out. Money considerations don’t override love considerations for most heteros.


10 posted on 01/31/2015 5:08:43 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

So 7% of 1%.


11 posted on 01/31/2015 5:14:43 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
I don’t see any particular reason to suppose they lied or misunderstood.

First, I will emphasize that I said "misunderstood." You added "lied," in a position of emphasis, for whatever reason.

Second, statistics: 7% is an insignificant fraction of any survey population, and it's entirely reasonable to suppose that this many respondents simply weren't paying attention to the question.

At a personal level, if asked if they foresaw or had a desire to enter into such a relationship themselves, the response would be affirmative only in the minority.

With this, I firmly agree.

12 posted on 01/31/2015 5:41:14 AM PST by Tax-chick ("It's always a longer trip when you defy God." ~ Msgr. Charles Pope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I guess I could see it plausible that some “gays” hated the idea of even having it as an institution. That would not be a misunderstanding (let’s factor lies out just as a distraction).


13 posted on 01/31/2015 5:43:48 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Right. “Misunderstanding” would be something like thinking that the question was whether the individual cared to be “married” himself, rather than about the legality of the concept. This kind of thing happens with people taking surveys, even when the question is carefully phrased to elicit the “correct” answer.


14 posted on 01/31/2015 5:56:24 AM PST by Tax-chick ("It's always a longer trip when you defy God." ~ Msgr. Charles Pope)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WhiskeyX

Doesn’t it mean 93% favor same sex marriage?? (sarc)


15 posted on 01/31/2015 5:59:17 AM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I could see some being copacetic with the idea of “gay marriage” being accommodated as a legally blessed arrangement. That doesn’t mean they can’t pretend, but it does mean that their pretense remains among them, it is not pressed upon larger society.

“Gay” is hardly monolithic. Some attempt to be high minded even in the face of their vice.


16 posted on 01/31/2015 6:00:21 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

I mean, NOT being accommodated.


17 posted on 01/31/2015 6:01:03 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik

Yes, there’s a school of thought among “rebel” gays that same sex marriage is not for gay guys. And they’re right.


18 posted on 01/31/2015 8:53:19 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: Loyalty Binds Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson