Posted on 01/29/2015 2:04:44 PM PST by COUNTrecount
Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch belonged to a student group that brought Jew-hating Palestinian terrorists to Harvard Law School every year she was a member.
Lynch belonged to the Harvard Black Law Students Association (BLSA) from 1981-1984 when she was a student.
During those years the radical black group brought representatives from the Palestinian Liberation Operation (PLO).
The groups leader, Mohammed Kenyatta, called for the liberation of Palestine and expressed support for the terrorist organization.
The BLSA defended bringing the terrorists in a letter to the editor of the Harvard student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson.
Jewish student organizations protested the speeches, especially in 1984. Liberal professor Alan Dershowitz joined the anti-PLO protests.
The Harvard Crimson condemned the response of Lynchs organization in 1984.
The Black Law Students Association (BALSA) committed an unjustifiable and discriminatory violation of student liberties last week when it denied Jewish students an opportunity to participate in a campus forum featuring a representative of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).
More than 30 Jewish Law Students Association (JLSA) members attended the panel discussion, outnumbering members of BALSA and the Third World Coalition, the events sponsors. But after opening the forum to questions from the floor, BALSA moderator Muhammad I. Kenyatta refused to recognize any of the white hands raised in the audience. BALSA and TWC members were to be given priority, he announced, proceeding to call on a Black student who hadnt raised his hand.
We defend the PLOs right to appear in an open forum at Harvard. All groups have a right to present their views; had Kenyatta permitted all students to challenge the speaker with critical questions, the ensuing discussion might have provided a constructive exchange of ideas and opinions.
By stifling debate, however, Kenyatta reduced the event to little more than a propaganda platform
(Excerpt) Read more at gotnews.com ...
Well, then, of course every democrat is going to vote for her.
Islamic roots run deep in the Current Regime. And now they try to bring us “Lynch Law”?
Anti-Christian and Anti-Jewish roots.
Aligning with Muslims is incidental.
Probably all true, but no MSM organization, and probably no member of Congress is going to raise the issue about a Black Law Students Association.
Chuck Schumer is delighted.
Like Michelle Robinson-Obama and her pal Townes-Whitley
http://dailycaller.com/2013/10/28/cgi-federal-executive-spent-christmas-with-the-obamas/
So why is there ANOTHER black nominee?
There are certainly enough qualified whites, not to mention Spanish or Asian candidates.
Was there a Harvard White Law Students Association?”
Who cares about skin color?
They do. So it is an issue.
If the Pubbies had any guts at all, they would bring this front and center and hammer her with it all the live long day, like the Dems would do if the players were reversed.
Here’s a script: “I am deeply disturbed that the nominee was a member of a blatantly anti-Semitic, pro terrorist organization. It might be overlooked if she was a teenager sowing oats, but she did this while a student at one of the most prestigious Law Schools in the country: Harvard, which means she should have achieved a maturity of understanding and judgment to know better. To the best of my knowledge, she has never repudiated her association with that group or its views. I cannot, in good conscience, vote for this nominee”
Lord save the USofA from the AffActs of Harvard, please.
Hammer her with her Jew-Hating, pro-perrorist Harvard group, but also with her undisclosed ties to Eric Holder
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3252063/posts?q=1&;page=1
OMG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.