Posted on 01/29/2015 3:15:15 AM PST by Reverend Saltine
There’s really only one solution.
save
BookMark
I guess this could be called ‘mission creep’ or a mission of the muzzie creeps.
In Texas of all places. The public officials have gone mad. What is there to do with insane governance? It is not called “creeping sharia” for nothing. It definitely has a demonic element to it because it beguiles and blinds those responsible for stopping it.
So ebony should e-mail this to FOX and Friends. They were just discussing this idiocy.
Then they will get ACORN like federal subsidies to do YWCA spousal abuse reports... What a joke. The Feds will contract these morons out to subvert State Rights.
Thanks for posting. HOORAY Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller.
It’s funny. I was telling my daughter this the other day. I asked her how long that would go on if it happened on out street.
Here in liberal MA, she named four people who would have seen it who had rifles in their home.
It might have started the same. And I am not saying it would have ended differently. But there would have been some returned fire.
The new Sharia tribunal in Texas is all voluntary, you see, so there is absolutely nothing for you Infidels to be worried about. The only catch is that we have seen how those voluntary tribunals worked out in Britain.
Voluntary Sharia Tribunal in Texas: This Is How It Starts, by Pamela Geller, Breitbart, January 28, 2015:
Breitbart Texas confirmed Tuesday that an Islamic Tribunal using Sharia law is indeed operating in Texas. But not to worry: an attorney for the tribunal assures us that participation is voluntary, and one of the Sharia judges, Dr. Taher El-badawi, says its devoted only to non-binding dispute resolution.
This is how it starts. This is how it started in the United Kingdom. When Sharia courts were instituted there, Muslim and non-Muslim officials alike all assured the British public and the world that they would be voluntary, restricted to matters involving non-criminal matters, and subject to the British courts. - Any areas in which British law and Sharia law conflicted would be referred not to the Sharia courts, but to the British courts.
That is not how it worked out.
A BBC Panorama Documentary goes undercover in one of the 85 sharia courts operating as a parallel legal system in the UK, uncovering the extensive abuse of women, refusal to grant divorces, charging of the woman but not the man for divorce proceedings, and even the taking away of the womans children, and rulings contrary to British law.
Now this is coming to Texas.
When asked what he would do when Islamic law conflicted with American law, El-badawi said: We follow Sharia law.
I actually don’t care if they practice Sharia law in amongst themselves to moderate arguments or other domestic disputes - unless local, state or federal laws are violated. Then Sharia is a door mat for the entry of American law and order.
UGH.
Only some food for thought. The Quran, in it’s perfect design, notes that while around us non-Islamic folks...they are to abide by our rules and laws. It does not require them to enforce their standards or rules upon us, except when they have defeated us as a society, killed us, or enslaved us. This isn’t opinion....this is what Muhammad actually said. Don’t be fooled by duality. They don’t require Sharia law when living in our society.
It would take on a life of its own, once it began.
Muslim women will most likely be coerced into using these courts, where they will be treated as second class citizens with less rights than men. That is a violation of our Constitution and laws on local, state and federal levels. Sharia is fundamentally incompatible with our legal system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.