Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/27/2015 7:10:19 PM PST by smokingfrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: smokingfrog

insanity


2 posted on 01/27/2015 7:11:20 PM PST by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

The judge and the prosecutor should be tarred, feathered, hauled off to Mexico on a rail then someone should pay a Mexican drug lord to execute them.

Idiocy on parade.


4 posted on 01/27/2015 7:16:18 PM PST by yarddog (Romans 8:38-39, For I am persuaded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

That Democrats sincerely want Governor Perry to die in prison for casting a veto tells you all you need to know about them.


6 posted on 01/27/2015 7:18:52 PM PST by Junior_G (Funny how liberals' love affair with Muslims began on 9/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Something must be in the water making Idiots in Austin.


8 posted on 01/27/2015 7:27:02 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
The judge said Count 1 isn't specific enough and encouraged the prosecutor to amend it. The judge said that the defense was making assumption -- "reasonable" assumptions according to the judge -- that Count 1 referred to his veto of a spending bill. The judge indicated Count 1 will have Constitutional problems if it indeed has to do with the veto.

The judge said that Count 2 was "defective" because it didn't address all the elements of a crime. He directed the prosecutor to amend Count 2 to argue that discussing the veto with his Staff wasn't part of Perry's deliberative process. It will be interesting to see how the prosecutor does that.

The judge explicitly found that the statutes in question are Constitutional. The judge specifically declined to make a determination if the indictment intends to prosecute Constitutionally protected speech. That would have to come at a later date, he said. It looks to me that the judge does not want to rule on this case on Constitutional grounds. I think the judge tightened the noose around the prosecutor's neck. The judge is guiding the prosecutor to amend the indictment so that he can find that even that no crime was committed even if all the allegations in the indictment are true.

9 posted on 01/27/2015 7:28:41 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

Roland Freisler lives...

In the DEMOCRAP party!


17 posted on 01/27/2015 8:04:45 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog

18 posted on 01/27/2015 8:05:30 PM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: smokingfrog
Can we get this judge to hear the case against Obama Amnesty? </s>
25 posted on 01/28/2015 12:14:30 AM PST by itsahoot (55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. $.98-$.89<$.10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson