Science!
Models, schmodels.
It’s funny that they cant predict thing 2 days out, but they damn well are sure about 50 years out...
Not a problem. Shall we apply the same standards of accuracy to the Global Warming computer predictions?!
The Euro model had been doing much better than the GFS(US) model for years. That why they went with the Euro.
“in large part because they trusted the wrong forecasting model,”
But the science is settled!
/ snerk
The Greatest Weather Forecaster, in my opinion, was Group Captain Sir J. M. Stagg. He certainly did not have the Billions of dollars in forecasting equipment that they have today, but with some weather balloons and scientific guessing he made D-Day possible in June 1944.
The last I knew , scienc was "GIGO" (Garbage in /Garbage out)as far as computer models.
Maybe they need to reorganize their information based on facts, rather that tell us about fantasy "GOWBULL CLIMATE CHANGE " !!
They can’t predict 4 hours out.
Why should anyone believe they can predict 100 and 200 years out?
Consensus in weather forecasting, as in all science, does not make it so. I wish the smartest people on Earth would remember this.
The Pope tried this when the Earth was the center of the solar system, be decree and be consensus.
The consensus was also the Louis Pasteur could never successfully develop a vaccine for rabies.
But those computers that predict global warming, climate change and rising sea levels are beyond reproach.
Ah , they were in Global Warming Mode ,which is 100% Hoax
Just because everyone agrees, doesn’t make it true. Science berated Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis, a Hungarian doctor, who first proposed in 1847 that mothers and babies were dying because doctors did not wash their hands in maternity wards. He noted that the wards staffed by doctors had three times the fatalities that wards with midwives had. He was ridiculed and ostracized for daring to think that a doctor could spread disease with his hands. (Of course, there are still instances where doctors and nurses don’t wash their hands between patients, but they know better.)
The narrative is more important than the computer model ...
Oooohhhh..... the wrong model. Okay. No problem. How cool
to have a job where you can be so wrong, responsible in part
for millions of dollars of lost economic activity and no consequence.
Just another day. NEXT!!!
The Weather Channel even gave it a name: Blizzard Juno.
Later, it was downgraded to: Winter Storm Juno.
:)
You don’t even need science. Going out and looking at the sky might help. Yesterday, I noticed the birds were barely eating at my outdoor feeders. That’s odd, I thought. We’re due for a blizzard. Then I drove into town and looking around I noticed: no fog. Almost always with bad snow storms, you get this ominous fog. It was just an ordinary grey. We did have a storm that dropped about 6 inches but I knew no blizzard was coming.