Skip to comments.
ISLAMIC TRIBUNAL CONFIRMED IN TEXAS; ATTORNEY CLAIMS ‘IT’S VOLUNTARY’
BreitBart ^
| 27 Jan 15
| Bob Price
Posted on 01/27/2015 9:03:01 AM PST by LSUfan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
To: itsahoot
the Supremes ruled it unconstitutional Which Supremes (state or federal) ruled what unconstitutional (Sharia Law or the law banning Sharia Law)?
61
posted on
01/27/2015 11:47:20 AM PST
by
PapaNew
(The grace of God & freedom always win the debate in the forum of ideas over unjust law & government)
To: BitWielder1
It doesn’t. It’s the same MO.
First equal treatment, then special protection, then privileged treatment.
totally agree
62
posted on
01/27/2015 11:56:36 AM PST
by
munin
(MSNBC?)
To: LSUfan
Well, as long as every case results in the deportation of both parties, I’m okay with it.
63
posted on
01/27/2015 12:22:25 PM PST
by
Squeako
(The radicals are the wolves. The moderates are the wolves in sheep's clothing.)
To: LSUfan
......
Breitbart Texas asked what happens when there is a conflict between Sharia law and
Texas law. El-badawi said most of the time, the laws are in agreement. When pushed
further he admitted that, we follow Sharia law. However, he explained, If the
parties are not satisfied with the tribunals decision, they do not have to
accept it and they can take the matter to Texas civil courts. He did not say
what the social ramifications of rejecting the judges decision would be.
....
64
posted on
01/27/2015 12:29:40 PM PST
by
deport
To: arthurus
voluntary?
He agreed; after we chopped off his head, he had no complaints.
65
posted on
01/27/2015 1:21:23 PM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
(/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
To: itsahoot
66
posted on
01/27/2015 1:23:00 PM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
(/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
To: LSUfan
It's only a matter of time before the Imams demand the Sharia courts decisions override US courts whenever there is a conflict.
After all, in their minds, Allah's law must supersede all other laws.
First Muslims will be pressed into compliance, then gradually others whenever one of the parties is Muslim.
Every time our court upholds a Sharia court decision, no matter how reasonable it seems at the time, it will set a legal precedent.
When not, there will be "Arab anger" in the streets.
Eventually, step by step, we will all be roped in.
Christian church sponsored arbitration don't use a completely different set of laws than US courts.
It's only a way for the parties to avoid court costs, not to evade US laws.
67
posted on
01/27/2015 1:26:22 PM PST
by
BitWielder1
(Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
To: PapaNew
Which Supremes (state or federal) ruled what unconstitutional (Sharia Law or the law banning Sharia Law)? The law banning Sharia Law.
68
posted on
01/27/2015 1:32:20 PM PST
by
itsahoot
(55 years a republican-Now Independent. Will write in Sarah Palin, no matter who runs. $.98-$.89<$.10)
To: LSUfan
Non profit... subsidized by government... is not voluntary... it is tax payer paid.
But again, the federal loves to mine the State with its own “civil rights” outfits, completely subverting the Constitution and good government, subsidizing so called non profits.
Shariah is terrorism, Charlie Hebdo massacre was Shariah.
I find it funny that muslims do not warn us about how their outfit actually works and gets results, except for the terrorists who do tell it like it is but are not taken seriously... even those converting from islam to christianity are not taken seriously.
69
posted on
01/27/2015 1:54:12 PM PST
by
lavaroise
(A well regulated gun being necessary to the state, the rights of the militia shall not be infringed)
To: LSUfan
Say it ain't so, Joe Texas !
70
posted on
01/27/2015 2:06:06 PM PST
by
tomkat
(when all else fails > RTFM)
To: tomkat
71
posted on
01/27/2015 2:25:43 PM PST
by
Bidimus1
To: circlecity
It’s Sedition and Treason.
72
posted on
01/27/2015 2:28:03 PM PST
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: Scrambler Bob
And I would be a omni-phobe (hater if everything) to oppose. Good, bring a Shotgun to the meeting, it's not an official court in Texas.
In fact, it's another form of Government, and America has laws against that.
No law can be withstanding outside of our Constitution and means of enacting laws.
Trying to enforce and create a false form of Government in the USA is Treason, and Sedition.
73
posted on
01/27/2015 2:32:39 PM PST
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: LSUfan
Hey, all you asshats who said Texas would be last. Have a nice long read and kiss my Texan ass.
Our Government has become the Ultimate Enemy of our sovereignty and Freedom.
So, WTF will anybody do about it? Answer:???
74
posted on
01/27/2015 2:36:44 PM PST
by
MaxMax
(Pay Attention and you'll be pissed off too! FIRE BOEHNER, NOW!)
To: Bidimus1
Thanks for that.
I'd like to live long enough to see (at least) the start of the final crusade.
75
posted on
01/27/2015 2:49:30 PM PST
by
tomkat
(when all else fails > RTFM)
To: LSUfan
To: LSUfan
To: Sacajaweau
Will be convenient if there is a need to ‘try someone’ who commits a mooslem act of violence. Everyone goes free, or everyone gets beheaded.
Is that the way you see it?
78
posted on
01/27/2015 6:40:46 PM PST
by
TribalPrincess2U
(0bama's agenda—Divide and conquer seems to be working.)
To: circlecity
“Sounds like a form of arbitration.”
Sounds like a perfect setup for a false flag operation.
Fake a raggy get together, blow it up, blame it on redneck
Texans or most likely blame it on the Tea Party.
Every bleeding heart tard would be running over
each other to kiss muslim butt. And to appease the muslims
demand for human sacrifice the feds will give them one and
not let it slide like Ferguson.
79
posted on
01/27/2015 7:17:14 PM PST
by
Slambat
To: TexasCajun; LucyT
Does that mean a head-chopper can be found not-guilty by this islamic tribunal and escape US criminal justice via the Double-Jeopardy Clause?Of course! Why, his whore daughter was seen in public without her burqa! Had he not killed her, he would have lost honor!
(Scenario purely hypothetical...for now.)
80
posted on
01/27/2015 8:19:53 PM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
("Ragnarok" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4L5nD7-qsEw)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-95 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson