What you should get from the link is that she's a lawyer before being either a Republican or Democrat. As a lawyer, she regards gay marriage as a matter of equity between two individuals, without consideration for its effect on children as a matter of equity. Lawyers are relatively incapable of dealing with issues beyond two parties or interests, not so much due to intellect as to the seeing the world through the adversarial lens.
Right! She is a lawyer going after the truth, not her opinion! You should understand that! She is stating the law as it currently stands..not her opinion!
That alone should make you proud of her instead of trying to take her personnel opinion into consideration. You should be proud of her for standing up for the law (current) regardless of her personal opinion! I disagree with the law and hate her position, but why do you hate her for standing up for the law?
Why does that not matter to you? She is so much more honest about the law and opinions that almost everybody else and actually say so!
You make an interesting point.
Of course lawyers are paid to represent one party over another in a conflict and to make plans for and take precautions against any such occurrence.