Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Carry_Okie

Right! She is a lawyer going after the truth, not her opinion! You should understand that! She is stating the law as it currently stands..not her opinion!

That alone should make you proud of her instead of trying to take her personnel opinion into consideration. You should be proud of her for standing up for the law (current) regardless of her personal opinion! I disagree with the law and hate her position, but why do you hate her for standing up for the law?

Why does that not matter to you? She is so much more honest about the law and opinions that almost everybody else and actually say so!


49 posted on 01/21/2015 11:16:39 PM PST by Deagle (gardless of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Deagle

I can see the NY Times article on Megan as a “liberal” has had it’s desired effect on conservatives.

Megan is anything but a liberal. She has a brain, a sense of humor and is classy. : )


63 posted on 01/22/2015 5:23:12 AM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: Deagle
Right! She is a lawyer going after the truth, not her opinion!

No, she's a lawyer with blinkers on as to what constitutes "truth."

That alone should make you proud of her instead of trying to take her personnel opinion into consideration.

No. She's an educated idiot. For example, she cannot see how gay unions are in injustice to the resulting children because to her, "the case" only involves the two adults.

I disagree with the law and hate her position, but why do you hate her for standing up for the law?

I don't hate her; I just don't respect her for being the useful statist tool.

She is so much more honest about the law and opinions that almost everybody else and actually say so!

She is honest about her take on the law. What she does not understand is that many issues are not properly solved in law. She thinks law addresses EVERYTHING. In her world, you'd have a lawyer on your shoulder instead of a conscience. Life is more complex than the world of lawyers who make lousy technical finders of "fact" in everything from environmental cases to matters of worker safety, issues that involve sufficient intangibles and uncertainties that they are best resolved in markets denominated in competing risk. This is but one reason why the Federal government was constituted with limited and enumerated powers, the limits of which she routinely ignores.

Why does that not matter to you?

Hopefully by now you see why it does. So her honesty is fine.

65 posted on 01/22/2015 6:12:58 AM PST by Carry_Okie (Those who profess noblesse oblige regress to droit du seigneur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson