To: Second Amendment First
The States’ Attorneys General did not file a federal lawsuit against the San Francisco ordinance; they filed an amicus brief in support of the lawsuit filed by various parties who, presumably, actually have standing to bring the action (unlike the Attorneys General).
To: Second Amendment First
The States Attorneys General did not file a federal lawsuit against the San Francisco ordinance; they filed an amicus brief in support of the lawsuit filed by various parties who, presumably, actually have standing to bring the action (unlike the Attorneys General). Your response beat mine. You have that exactly right - unlike the reporter.
4 posted on
01/09/2015 1:38:01 PM PST by
gdani
(Ebola exposed the U.S. as fearful, easy-to-manipulate weaklings)
To: Second Amendment First
Thanks for the information.
I was just going to post a question asking how a state would go about suing an out-of-state city over one of that city’s laws.
That is an horrible article. Even as leftist as it has always been, the WaPo at least USED to have writers who were not complete imbeciles.
10 posted on
01/09/2015 1:56:23 PM PST by
WayneS
(Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos.)
To: Second Amendment First
Thank you - I was wondering about the standing issue.
11 posted on
01/09/2015 1:57:43 PM PST by
Slings and Arrows
("Clapping the Blues" - http://youtu.be/0bmAJHHqfIw)
To: Second Amendment First
Thanks for the clarifaction. I was about to post a treatise on “standing.”
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson