Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary rocked with left hook as liberals side with Elizabeth Warren for 2016
Washington Times ^ | December 25, 2014 | David Sherfinski

Posted on 12/27/2014 1:07:18 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum

She is one of the most active — and most partisan — senators in the chamber, which is part of what makes Sen. Elizabeth Warren so attractive to the progressive groups pleading with her to enter the 2016 presidential race.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: 2016election; cromnibus; doddfrank; election2016; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; lieawatha; massachusetts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: St_Thomas_Aquinas

I agree that (only)the moonbats love Fauxcahontas, but the moonbats are firmly in control of the democrap party

just like the RINO’s run the GOP


21 posted on 12/27/2014 1:36:53 PM PST by Mr. K (Palin/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They’re both horrible. Both fake phoney frauds. Both would worse than 0. They are intensly focused witches who would bring this country closer to communism.


22 posted on 12/27/2014 1:37:03 PM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

First Obama, and now (potentially) Fauxcahontas. Face it, the Democrats don’t like Hillary any more than Republicans do. She just isn’t very likable.


23 posted on 12/27/2014 1:39:00 PM PST by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

We have been under Communism since Barry took office. It’s just that few have the guts to admit it in public.


24 posted on 12/27/2014 1:39:43 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I still keep seeing a Hillary-Warren ticket.

It will be a tough ticket to beat.

25 posted on 12/27/2014 1:40:14 PM PST by Michael.SF. (It takes a gun to feed a village (and an AK 47 to defend it).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x
she's not ready for the big time yet.

I agree. She didn't do one interview with tough questions, and literally ran away from reporters when the Crockajawea story was hot rather than talk about it. If she sat down for an interview with someone who asked her specific questions that she couldn't answer in pablum, she'd quickly reveal herself to be an intellectual lightweight.

There are some topics she'd have to deal with. She was flipping foreclosed homes with her brother in Ohio, and was practicing law from her Harvard school office even though the bar had no record of her registration as a lawyer in Massachusetts. She surrendered her New Jersey license mid-campaign for undisclosed reasons (did she tick the "I'm an Indian" box?). And then there was the cookbook she contributed recipes to: Pow-Wow Chow. Won't the PC Police get all incensed over that?

And she didn't win the senate election with a landslide; it was 54/46. In Massachusetts.


26 posted on 12/27/2014 1:42:18 PM PST by LostInBayport (When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

The left loves people with Commie leanings.


27 posted on 12/27/2014 1:52:47 PM PST by Retired Chemist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Lizzy has baggage, Hillary has cargo, for what that’s worth


28 posted on 12/27/2014 1:55:33 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Either one would be the final nail in the coffin of the United States of America.

I thought that was nobama's job?

29 posted on 12/27/2014 2:00:33 PM PST by upchuck (Too much ME, not enough G.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This is a sleight of hand trick, so to speak. More and more It seems like Hillary isn’t going to run, but the radical Democrats don’t want Warren to seem like a second choice. Creating this faux competition allows Fauxhontas to emerge as a popular victor. With the left it is all about pop stardom and image.


30 posted on 12/27/2014 2:12:15 PM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
It's all designed to make Hillary look palatable -- like running Howard Dean alongside John Kerry. I mean, next to Elizabeth Warren, she does look almost sane, doesn't she?
31 posted on 12/27/2014 2:13:56 PM PST by 9thLife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael.SF.

No way is Hil going to share a ticket with someone the left seems to love more.


32 posted on 12/27/2014 2:17:24 PM PST by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hugin

No, she says she isn’t running (as in right now, the door is left open for later).


33 posted on 12/27/2014 2:17:39 PM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

“Singularly unimpressive “ you have a funny way of spelling DISASTER


34 posted on 12/27/2014 2:20:35 PM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

After all is said and done, the major obstacle to electing a conservative will be the media...again.


35 posted on 12/27/2014 2:22:33 PM PST by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In Warren, the Dems will have a candidate who is able to shamelessly lie with a straight face and appear earnest while doing so. Hillary can’t do it nearly as well.


36 posted on 12/27/2014 2:27:33 PM PST by CASchack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: drypowder

Baggage v cargo...that I agree with. I was going to comment on the fact that Clinton has too much exposure while the fake Indian has yet to be truly vetted by the national press, unlikey they will do unless they are kicking and screaming.

The truth that needs to be observed in this is quite simple. No progressive (liberal, democrat, or communist) can ever be elected in USA when their ideas, past achievements, and future goals are examined and discussed. Like Obama, someone must come out of the shadows (always vote “present”) and remain an enigma in order to fool the public.

Democrats “Gruber” the electorate.


37 posted on 12/27/2014 2:28:48 PM PST by Omniscient Certitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport
There are some topics she'd have to deal with. She was flipping foreclosed homes with her brother in Ohio, and was practicing law from her Harvard school office even though the bar had no record of her registration as a lawyer in Massachusetts. She surrendered her New Jersey license mid-campaign for undisclosed reasons (did she tick the "I'm an Indian" box?). And then there was the cookbook she contributed recipes to: Pow-Wow Chow. Won't the PC Police get all incensed over that?

That's why she says she is not running. I really suspect that she isn't. The current noise is just a sop to the party's ultra-left.

38 posted on 12/27/2014 2:31:29 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

39 posted on 12/27/2014 2:31:48 PM PST by Bon mots (American Exceptionalism becomes American Acceptionalism under this regime... :()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: x

“but she’s not ready for the big time yet.”

If the fake Indian can make frybread, create a halfway decent porcupine needle box and promise to give every left wing hippy their “real” Indian name, I think she has a chance.


40 posted on 12/27/2014 2:33:16 PM PST by sergeantdave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson