Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Warren is catching fire
Politico ^ | December 13, 2014 | Katie Glueck

Posted on 12/14/2014 2:14:57 AM PST by Zakeet

Ready for Warren? Run Liz Run? Run Warren Run? Draft Warren?

Progressive activists haven’t agreed on what to call the movement urging Elizabeth Warren to run for president, but they largely concur on this: with every recent anti-establishment move the Massachusetts senator grows more attractive as a 2016 candidate, both in her own right and as a progressive foil for Hillary Clinton.

Such sentiments were on vivid display this week at RootsCamp, a gathering of some 2,000 progressive activists held in Washington, D.C. The event was held as Warren and others on the left have been denouncing the “cromnibus” spending bill winding its way through Congress over provisions they say are too friendly to Wall Street.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2016demprimary; 2016election; abortion; cromnibus; deathpanels; demagogicparty; doddfrank; election2016; elizabethwarren; fauxahontas; hillary; katieglueck; liberalism; lieawatha; massachusetts; memebuilding; obamacare; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; politico; tedcruz; texas; warren; warren2016; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Popman

Fauxcahontas is catching fire? I thought I smelled sulphur.


61 posted on 12/14/2014 7:00:01 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Elizabeth Warren gave an excellent speech in the US Senate about the control banks, particularly Citibank, hold over the federal government. No Republicans in the HOR or Senate have embraced the issue, and no one has filled Ron Paul's shoes in speaking out against the Federal Reserve.

The Democrats will be able to campaign with Warren as the candidate that they will save US citizens from banking excesses, especially with the changes they put in this crummy bill that help banks and put the FDIC in jeopardy.

62 posted on 12/14/2014 7:00:24 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Riflema
new boss? same as the old boss?

Problem is, the RINO globalist elitist ptb are hell-bent on giving us Christie, Jeb, or Romney (etc ad nauseum). We have to win the nomination, or we've already lost.

63 posted on 12/14/2014 7:02:32 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: grania

November 16, 2014..the day money died. Obama and other world leaders contracted with the world banks...about 30 that deposits, retirement accounts, larger savings accounts would become BANK CAPITAL, paper that would be used to pay the banks derivative bets off in case another stock market cash left the banks in jeopardy of closing like 2008.

Zero Hedge carried a several articles as well as other places explaining what happened at the G20, so this was a done deal before it became part of this Budget.


64 posted on 12/14/2014 7:12:14 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

I agree with her too. But if a Republican had made the same speech, no one would have heard about it (except us.)

We are at the mercy of the media, and there isn’t a damn thing we can do about it. The vast majority of Americans don’t follow news about their government, so whatever meme they happen to hear from time to time becomes their base of understanding.

Today the meme pushed by the media is that Warren is awesome and presidential. Just watch how her momentum swells from now on.


65 posted on 12/14/2014 7:13:24 AM PST by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
re: bank deposits being capital that can be use to pay off derivative bets

I did not know that. Would it be wise to transfer money out of retirement accounts? I'm senior enough to do so without penalty. I don't have a lot of savings, and it's necessary to supplement my small pension. Will money be safe under certain limits in accounts?

I was told by a banker (who was trying to sell me an annuity) that if the FDIC has to cover savings, they have 30 years to stretch it out. Is that true?

I wonder how many people have a clue how bad this is, and now it's supported by the federal budget.

66 posted on 12/14/2014 7:23:22 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
On The Warpath For Warren - Princess Liawatha Cstches Fire Watha...

It's probably easier to nominate her than trying to bring George McGovern back to life.

67 posted on 12/14/2014 7:26:23 AM PST by Bernard (The Road To Hell is not paved with good results.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

I’m with you on this. While I despise Squaw Warren on virtually everything, she is right on this big banks bailout stuff. And it will give her traction as a candidate.

The GOP badly needs a legit candidate who realizes that supporting big business and crony capitalism is a bad idea and has been for some time. Not a Ron Paul nut but someone who can articulate the need for enforcement of antitrust laws and a level playing field for small and medium size business and industry.


68 posted on 12/14/2014 7:31:36 AM PST by SteveAustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: grania

I can’t help you there, as all banking rules changed at the G20 Summit, and our Budget passed so not sure if any large sums can be transferred or move at this point. Check with your bank or place your money is deposited.

I believe you are better off if your bank is not one of the huge ones internationally. A local bank or credit union might be more lenient...the FDIC guarantee is no longer viable....they know in next two years there will be another crash....that is why this is being done. NOONE will get a refund, and those elites have their money in gold, silver, and where they can watch it, not in a bank....even if they own it. Offshore will not work, as those were never insured by anything. Corruption will reign in those countries...imho.


69 posted on 12/14/2014 7:33:45 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: grania

One thought...if you ask about transferring money to an account you can access...be careful, and don’t say you are going to take it all out.

Get the new banking rules etc to read at home. Ask them how the new Budget banking rules affect you. Take as large a sum out as you are allowed at once...and find out how often you can do that.
Best wishes.


70 posted on 12/14/2014 7:37:08 AM PST by Kackikat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: grania
Elizabeth Warren gave an excellent speech in the US Senate about the control banks, particularly Citibank, hold over the federal government.

The 'Cross of Gold' populism didn't work for William Jennings Bryan and it won't work for Lizzie.

She has as much chance as Eugene McCarthy or George McGovern.

71 posted on 12/14/2014 7:42:07 AM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Popman

Like I said, the vast majority of the population has grown no wiser since 2008. See #62 for how she gets repackaged as the Un-Obama: far wiser, in touch with the working person, great experience running a law office; new car smell etc. Yes, sick-making, but they will polish this pig’s ear till it shines. Watch Out.


72 posted on 12/14/2014 8:14:01 AM PST by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: grania

We have to do better than that even. We need a conservative the majority can warm to, doesn’t scare them and has a personality that the media wing of the DNC can’t paint as scary, or mean, or uncaring. A very high standard, but’s that the honest truth. I really believe there’s a vast mass out there that is stuck into their NFL, DWTS or whatever and buys the image not the substance. Right now, the Warren image can be polished to something very shiny to get their attention. Who the heck do we have?


73 posted on 12/14/2014 8:17:44 AM PST by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Senator_Blutarski

And you can add the “populist” (disguised socialist) speechifying to distinguish her from the other guy.


74 posted on 12/14/2014 8:18:44 AM PST by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Ditto that. Very sad.


75 posted on 12/14/2014 8:19:41 AM PST by Riflema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: grania
None of that answers why consitutional conservatives who are supposed to be on our side haven’t been on this issue.

That's true. But is that really the question at hand?

You say that the fact that she'll talk about it is reason enough to vote for her. I submit that she has a history of lying, and trusting that she'd actually do anything about it if elected is a mistake. She's no more qualified or prepared to actually fix that then Obama was reform the health care system. If anything she'd use it as cover for some new socialist re-distribution scheme the same way Obama did with health care.

76 posted on 12/14/2014 8:25:09 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Riflema
Hmmm, sounds familiar.

Yes, it does. Any wonder Bammie likes her so much?

77 posted on 12/14/2014 8:26:50 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
Elizabeth Warren is catching fire


78 posted on 12/14/2014 8:27:23 AM PST by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
Warren is the perfect DNC nominee to follow Obama.....no experience, first-term Senator, no leadership, no background.

I disagree with you on the no background part. She has a pretty well established background, unlike Obama, who really had nothing and could get away with running a campaign based on vague and ambiguous platitudes.

The three big things against Warren are, first, the whole Liawatha/Fauxahontas scandal - which will resonate outside of deep blue states like MA. Second, that her jump into the political world was enabled by the great personal wealth she accumulated by exploiting foreclosures. And third, that she's going to be in a competitive nomination race against people who want to be President just as badly as she does. Including one of the most ruthless politicians this country has ever produced and who will not allow herself to be caught off-guard like she did in 2008.
79 posted on 12/14/2014 8:31:18 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Riflema
who the heck do we have?

Most of the conservatives who make it to the US Senate and to positions of relevance in the HOR will do real well with a media coach. I'd guess that Elizabeth Warren had some time with one. Her presentation, speech and appearance were much better than the Elizabeth Warren we're use to.

By coach, I don't mean someone who reads polls and tells people what to say and think. I mean someone who can teach how to deal with the media, interviewers, and audiences.

80 posted on 12/14/2014 8:33:04 AM PST by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson