Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It’s time for John Boehner to go
thepunditpress.com ^ | 12/12/14 | Dan Wilson

Posted on 12/12/2014 4:09:31 PM PST by cotton1706

Since the Republicans regained control of the House of Representatives, we expected wonderful changes to come. We once again had control over the house along with having the ability to have some control over what was taking place to our Country.

We knew that President Obama was a rogue President who had control over both houses. This left the Republican Party with virtually nothing they could do. Even when President Obama’s own party did not agree with him. He would simply use executive privilege and pass it anyway.

After the election and the Republicans gained control over the House of Representatives. Republicans now had the ability pull in the reigns of the President even if he did use executive Privilege. Since Congress has control over the nation’s Budget as stated in Article I Section 8 of the Constitution. Congress has the ability to refuse to fund any laws or acts that required funding. Speaker Boehner however never allowed the House to vote against funding laws Obama passed through Executive privilege.

As a result over the following two years, the President routinely went around Congress without fear of Congress doing anything about it. The most the Republican Party managed to get was an occasional empty threat by an ineffective Speaker of the House. This is why over the past two years we have heard virtually nothing from the House of Representatives. Speaker Boehner blamed it on the Democratic controlled Senate. Yesterday he proved this was not the case.

Even knowing that come January the Republican Party will have control over both Houses. Speaker Boehner elected to endorse a one year extension on the Budget. This is why it is imperative that Congress forces Boehner to resign as soon as possible.

(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; brokenrecord; elections; johnboehner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; darkangel82

http://www.cleveland.com/open/index.ssf/2014/12/bipartisan_redistricting_refor_1.html\

Ghey.


61 posted on 12/13/2014 6:20:13 AM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

The least we can do, is not let the voters forget their betrayal and vote them out asap. I know these are leagues of lawyers and it is like pinning down a pealed grape. However, their lives should be as uncomfortable as the citizens that elected them can make it. Be in their face constantly until they are voted out or run out like thieves in the night.


62 posted on 12/13/2014 6:26:01 AM PST by Cannoneer ( "..raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair.." GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Yep.


63 posted on 12/13/2014 7:08:24 AM PST by GOPsterinMA (I'm with Steve McQueen: I live my life for myself and answer to nobody.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Maybe not. As I understand it, anybody (doesn’t have to be a Rep) can be elected speaker. How ‘bout Allan West or Sarah Palin?

You are indeed....correct. But....it would be a strange situation to have the Speaker of the House.......a sitting Senator.

I would go with Sarah or Allan as well. Allan would probably do better as he's got the "House" experience. But....I understand that Sarah is a fast learner.

64 posted on 12/13/2014 7:50:04 AM PST by Diego1618 (Put "Ron" on the Rock!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Impy; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; Galactic Overlord-In-Chief; darkangel82

It’s not quite as horrible as the headline makes it sound.

First of all, it doesn’t affect congressional redistricting:

“The plan would not change Ohio’s congressional redistricting process, in which a panel of lawmakers draws maps that are approved by a vote of both chambers.”

“Lawmakers dropped plans to change the congressional map-drawing process after concerns were raised the changes might conflict with a U.S. Supreme Court decision expected next year regarding Arizona’s redistricting process.”

And as for state legislative districts, the new process isn’t *that* much different from the old one:

“Currently, a five-member panel composed of three statewide officeholders and two state lawmakers draws maps for the state House and Senate districts every 10 years. The panel has drawn districts to be safer for party incumbents, which critics say cheats voters from deciding their representatives.

The plan passed by the Senate would establish a seven-member commission composed of the governor, secretary of state, state auditor and two members from each chamber and from each of the majority and minority parties. The commission would draw district lines according to several criteria aimed at keeping counties and communities in the same district.”

And while the new system ostensibly gives each party a “veto” when both the state senator and state representative from the party that are in the commission vote against a particular redistricting plan, it’s a rather toothless veto:

“A map would need approval from at least two members of the minority party to pass. Any map that does not receive two minority member votes would only be good for four years instead of 10.

In the Senate-approved version, the second time the panel doesn’t get minority approval, the map would be in place for six years. During that time, the panel’s makeup could change.”

So it’s not a capitulation by Republicans as the headline would have us believe, and I’m guessing that one of the reasons why al but one senate Republican voted for it is because it won’t change things that much but will take pressure aay from making more drastic changes (sure, the League of Women Voters will continue to b1tch, but the odds of another change being made would be quite low).


65 posted on 12/13/2014 8:22:18 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll defend your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
I nailed it four years ago.

Unfortunately, we're stuck with this not-so-great compromiser. Great ready for a couple more miserable years ahead of us.

66 posted on 12/13/2014 11:31:08 AM PST by jpl (The government spent another half a million bucks in the time it just took you to read this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

I first learned of it by skulking around DU, they were celebrating it so naturally I was terrified.


67 posted on 12/13/2014 4:03:02 PM PST by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Duncan in Knoxville voted against the bill. And I thought Chuck would be
better than Wamp. Apparently not.


68 posted on 12/13/2014 4:18:20 PM PST by tennmountainman (True conservatives don't like being rained on by their own party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cibco

A state cannot recall a federal official. Congress does not recognize recall petitions.


69 posted on 12/13/2014 4:54:36 PM PST by Theodore R. (Liberals keep winning; so the American people must now be all-liberal all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Duncan in Knoxville voted against the bill. And I thought Chuck would be better than Wamp. Apparently not.

Jimmy Duncan is reasonably consistent on important issues and appears to study the bills & issues before voting. But Chuck has been around Corker too long I'm afraid. The city of Oak Ridge in Chuck's District is for all practical purposes now a refuge city for illegals. That's a bad deal considering the assets there.

I'm literally right on the line of the two congressional districts. If I step across my property line to my south then I'm in Duncan's district. I need a land swap :>}

70 posted on 12/13/2014 6:30:42 PM PST by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: All; cotton1706

Anybody who has a Republican rep. ought to call them & tell them to vote against Boehner.

Also, you can write a short letter to editor and tell your neighbors in you district to do the same, and tell them why Boehner needs to go (just in case some don’t know why).


71 posted on 12/13/2014 10:18:22 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; All

Boehner did this to PREVENT any change. He can’t afford to listen to voters or the wishes of voters. IOW he can’t do his job.

the purpose of power mad dc is to acquire more power for power mad dc.

Boehner’s attitude is the problem on a political level.


72 posted on 12/14/2014 8:33:30 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson