[DugwayDuke]

Obama is the matador. Amnesty is his cape. The GOP should remember what happens to the bull before they play this game.

[BenLurkin]

Obama "could've done all this quietly, without making any announcement whatsoever."

Government has stolen far many of our rights and liberties by way of shadowy and unheralded taxes and regulations.

[Steve_Seattle]

I think the word “trolling” is often misused. I don’t think there is any such thing as a “troll” in a general circulation newspaper (except perhaps in the sports section, which favors local teams) because such a newspaper is by definition a forum for the general public, not some specific group. Trolling involves “invading” a special interest site with the purpose of annoying or disrupting the normal patrons of such a site.

[Steve_Seattle]

Barack “I Won” Obama has never been known for his graciousness.

[molson209]

Obama is trying to be relevant

[pwatson]

One of our local Dallas talk radio was saying this yesterday. As far as he knew there had not been any new issued executive orders as a result of the Presidents speech. Also he already had de facto done this by ordering the stand down of the entire immigration enforcement already. Many are starting to think this is all about keeping Obama relevant and in the news.

[expat_panama]

When spelling "deceiving," remember it's "i before e except after c."

--but when spelling most other words it's usually "e before i except after c" because there're more exceptions than words that fit that stupid rule. They don't teach it in schools anymore.

[spokeshave]

For those who don't know, in Internet parlance, trolling is an effort to elicit outrage from a specific group or the public generall

More like a NUDGE

Obama's new Czarina of NUDGE

In an effort to “nudge” Americans to support bigger and more intrusive government while changing behavior to suit the whims of the political class in Washington, D.C., the Obama administration is following the lead of U.K. authorities by building what the White House refers to as a “Behavioral Insights Team.” According to an official document about the scheme aimed at recruiting personnel, the controversial team will be charged with prodding the U.S. population to think and behave in ways that officials deem best on everything from "sustainability" to health and education.

[Mears]

“” (Pro tip: When spelling “deceiving,” remember it’s “i before e except after c.”)

---

Utter nonsense and from a “pro”.

Examples——— weird,seizure

.

[Dick Bachert]

Ahh.. it reminds him of his favorite pastime in those sleazy Chicago bath houses.

[uncitizen]

Geez, Jonah, you’re slow.

[Dick Bachert]

This entire “administration” has been a series of mini Reischstag Fires.

Am I the only guy who believes this current turmoil has been orchestrated to serve as another diversion to the ongoing Obama scandals, the recent immigration mess and the building crisis in the Middle East. Obama is well on the way to marginalizing the white population here with millions of new minority citizens who will soon become the new majority (and predominately welfare “beneficiaries” and DEMOCRAT VOTERS).

Jefferson – and other founders – greatly feared what that would do to America!

[uncitizen]

Obama has insisted more than 20 times in the past. "I'm not a king. My job as the head of the executive branch ultimately is to carry out the law," Obama told Telemundo in 2013.

obama doesn't say anything 20 times without a reason. Especially something that expresses how great he is NOT. He said this so that when he did the opposite these Mexican "immigrants" will know that now he IS king.

He is their King. There is nothing in writing giving them this amnesty so if they don't play ball his way it can all be over like that.

[Nateman]

Not over-react? He seizes law making power from Congress, a direct assault on the rule of law and ultimately our liberty and our lives and he says don’t ‘over-react’? Excuse me but I demand Republicans over-react! They should do something so painful, so blatant that no President ever wants to try such an abuse again! I’d strip the SOB of funding for his security and start Impeachment hearings.

[Tilted Irish Kilt]

(from the article):" Meanwhile, the only "crisis" Obama claims he is responding to is Congress' "failure to act."

The effect of two dictators :one a president , and one in the Senate (Reid) with the 'nuclear option', and a pocket veto.

[spokeshave]

Reagan and Bush were mostly cleaning up problems with laws passed by Congress.

Yeah....and look what President Reagan put into the 1986 bill that also solved future problems with presidential diktats.

This posted 11/22/14....Hat Tip to xzins

Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required)

Government Printing Office ^ | 1986 | US Congress Posted on 11/22/2014, 4:03:19 PM by xzins

Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required) Government Printing Office ^ | 1986 | US Congress

Posted on 11/22/2014, 4:03:19 PM by xzins

"(3) NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES.—

"(A) IN GENERAL.—The President may not implement any change under paragraph (1) unless at least—

"(i) 60 days,

"(ii) one year, in the case of a major change described in subparagraph (D)(iii), or

"(iii) two years, in the case of a major change described in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (D), before the date of implementation of the change, the President has prepared and transmitted to the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change.

If the President proposes to make any change regarding social security account number cards, the President shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change.

The President promptly shall cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any major change (described in subparagraph (D)) proposed and reported to Congress.

"(B) CONTENTS OF REPORT.—In any report under subparagraph (A) the President shall include recommendations for the establishment of civil and criminal sanctions for unauthorized use or disclosure of the information or identifiers contained in such system.

"(C) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF MAJOR CHANGES.—

"(i) HEARINGS AND REVIEW.—The Committees on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives and of the Senate shall cause to have printed in the Congressional Record the substance of any major change described in subparagraph (D), shall hold hearings respecting the feasibility and desirability of implementing such a change, and, within the two year period before implementation, shall report to their respective Houses findings on whether or not such a change should be implemented.

"(ii) CONGRESSIONAL ACTION.—No major change may be implemented unless the Congress specifically provides, in an appropriations or other Act, for funds for implementation of the change.

"(D) MAJOR CHANGES REQUIRING TWO YEARS NOTICE AND CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.—As used in this paragraph, the term 'major change' means a change which would—

"(i) require an individual to present a new card or other document (designed specifically for use for this purpose) at the time of hiring, recruitment, or referral,

"(ii) provide for a telephone verification system under which an employer, recruiter, or referrer must transmit to a Federal official information concerning the immigration status of prospective employees and the official transmits to the person, and the person must record, a verification code, or

"(iii) require any change in any card used for accounting purposes under the Social Security Act, 42 USC 301 note. including any change requiring that the only social security account number cards which may be presented in order to comply with subsection (bXlXCXi) are such cards as are in a counterfeit-resistant form consistent with the second sentence of section 205(cX2XD) of the Social ecurity Act. 42 use 405. Discussion here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3230042/posts?page=83

[Dr. Thorne]

Trolling? More like cruising.

[mykroar]

Moreover, the Emancipation Proclamation didn't have a two-year time limit

Everyone that thinks this is only going to last for two years, please raise your hand. That's what I thought.

[Kenny Bunk]

One doesn’t look like this without massive pharmaceutical help. This fellow is quite nuts. And gay.

[hotsteppa]

I would love for Jonah to define what, in this situation, would be considered “overreacting”.

So, what's the correct Republican response? To just stand there like deer in the headlights? Are we suppose to just sit around all the time and run the clock out on Obama and not respond to his destruction? Sometimes I don't get our pundits.