Skip to comments.
Judge Overturns Montana's Gay Marriage Ban
ABC News ^
| 11/19/14
| Lisa Baumann (AP)
Posted on 11/19/2014 4:12:48 PM PST by madprof98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Celebrations, eh? Beheadings of Christians, perhaps?
1
posted on
11/19/2014 4:12:48 PM PST
by
madprof98
To: madprof98
It is the states that created the federal government and therefore should be telling it what it can and cannot do. And not vice versa.
To: madprof98
There’s no such language in the US Constitution of course, much less it “existing” for such a purpose.
3
posted on
11/19/2014 4:15:47 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: all the best
4
posted on
11/19/2014 4:16:12 PM PST
by
gorush
(History repeats itself because human nature is static)
To: all the best
Well what kind of amendment could be put in there that says “we really mean it this time around”?
5
posted on
11/19/2014 4:16:43 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: madprof98
Appointed by....Mullah Obama
6
posted on
11/19/2014 4:19:22 PM PST
by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: madprof98
Wait until these same tyrant clowns in their black robes start lowering the age of consent to eight years old. That’s what these nasty old bass turds are working their way towards.
7
posted on
11/19/2014 4:20:26 PM PST
by
FlingWingFlyer
('Provisional ballots'. When legal votes just aren't getting the job done. - The DemocRATS.)
To: madprof98
. . . No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. If gay people and straight people all have the right to marry unmarried adults of the opposite sex who are not close relatives, that is equal protection. Any other ruling is outside the constitution and illegitimate.
8
posted on
11/19/2014 4:25:49 PM PST
by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: madprof98
... and gutless Republican leaders do nothing.
9
posted on
11/19/2014 4:28:33 PM PST
by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
To: Pollster1
Well, it’s sad that activists felt they had to re-engineer a social institution in an unprecedentedly twisted way. Likening this to cross-cultural or cross-racial marriage is ludicrous. The hate is coming from the advocates of such arrangements, not from those who protest their being lent dignity by the state.
10
posted on
11/19/2014 4:29:28 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: madprof98
Once again, the rights, and the will of the VOTERS, are overturned by ONE judge.
To: madprof98
Legislation from the bench. As anti-American as you can get. Wonder how much money this criminal hack made of this deal ??
12
posted on
11/19/2014 6:03:39 PM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: madprof98
Teach the judge the 10th amendment. Not the judge's jurisdiction. This is not a 14th amendment question.Period.
Full stop.
End of story.
To: Bushbacker1
What happens if the states refuse to obey the ruling from a leftist judge? After all, our Dear Leader picks and chooses which laws and rulings he will observe. It shouldn’t be any different for the states to do the same. Tell them to stick it -
14
posted on
11/19/2014 6:27:53 PM PST
by
Catsrus
(al)
To: Catsrus
What happens if the states refuse to obey the ruling from a leftist judge?Run a search on "Little Rock + 1957" for your answer.
15
posted on
11/19/2014 6:29:36 PM PST
by
Publius
("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
To: madprof98
In the DOMA case, the SCOTUS ruled that STATES have the power to regulate marriage, therefore DOMA was overturned.
Now comes this degenerate POS high and mighty evil demented imbecile "Federal Judge" tyrant "ruling" that this State does not have the right to regulate marriage.
The "Federal Judiciary" and "Federal Judges" are not provided for in the Constitution and are a creation of Congress.
What has been created can be destroyed.
16
posted on
11/19/2014 6:39:16 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(SMASH THE CPUSA)
To: Ouderkirk
This "Federal Judge" was appointed by the faggot on the left?
17
posted on
11/19/2014 6:43:01 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(SMASH THE CPUSA)
To: madprof98
Another illegitimate legalistic fraud perpetuated by a judicial branch usurping the legislative branch’s function and violating the principle of popular sovereignty.
18
posted on
11/19/2014 7:02:42 PM PST
by
GenXteacher
(You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
To: Catsrus
The president would send in federal troops to enforce the ruling.
To: Oliviaforever
He should at least be forced to.
20
posted on
11/19/2014 7:36:20 PM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson