Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hazards of secondhand marijuana smoke
CBSNEWS ^ | 17 Nov 14 | Dennis Thompson

Posted on 11/18/2014 6:56:53 AM PST by elhombrelibre

That whiff of pot that drifts your way at a rock concert or outdoor event could damage your heart and blood vessels as much as secondhand cigarette smoke does, preliminary research suggests.

Blood vessel function in laboratory rats dropped by 70 percent after a half-hour of exposure to secondhand marijuana smoke -- similar to results found with secondhand tobacco smoke, researchers from the University of California, San Francisco reported Sunday.

Reduced blood vessel function can increase a person's risk of developing hardened arteries, which could lead to a heart attack.

"Smoke is smoke. Both tobacco and marijuana smoke impair blood vessel function similarly," said study senior author Matthew Springer, a cardiovascular researcher and associate professor of medicine in the university's cardiology division. "People should avoid both, and governments who are protecting people against secondhand smoke exposure should include marijuana in those rules."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cannabis; iflegaltheywillcome; marijuana; pot; potheads; regulatelibertarians; taxlibertarians; wod; youaskedtoregulateit; youaskedtotaxit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: elhombrelibre

Except that secondhand smoke is a crock just like human-caused global warming!

10 years ago or more El Rushbo cited a WHO, World Health Organization study that was done in Europe to document the perils of secondhand smoke. What they found was that the full strength smoke inhaled by the smoker IS harmful.

But secondhand smoke is diluted so much when it reaches the bystander that, while the SMELL may be unpleasant, the actual physiological hazard is practically nil. So since the result of the study didn’t fit their agenda, they spiked the story, never published it and most people know nothing about it. What else is new for commie-libs?!


21 posted on 11/18/2014 7:30:39 AM PST by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Yup. Look up the dangers of wood smoke. Yes. They say that it’s as dangerous as cigarettes. And people allow their children around that crap! /s


22 posted on 11/18/2014 7:35:40 AM PST by Marie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

But we are told by the CDC second hand smoke kills 50,000 in the US every year.

But...not one death certificate has ever listed “second hand smoke” as the cause of death.


23 posted on 11/18/2014 7:43:14 AM PST by wrench (While not "airborne" , Ebola is a Spit-Borne virus. Good thing no one sneezes in public)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

” I can vouch that secondhand tobacco
smoke is annoying. But famously it hasn’t
been proven a health hazard.”

Sorry, but if tobacco is bad through a filter, it is probably bad without one. The idea second hand smoke is harmless is idiotic. It don’t take a lot of reasoning to understand second hand smoke is bad.

I don’t want, nor should have to share your cigarette. And anyone not man enough to face life without recreational drugs will get his joint shoved right where it belongs, if he tries to share his high with me.


24 posted on 11/18/2014 7:47:16 AM PST by LevinFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wrench

This could reflect situations that are fairly rare like a fatal asthma attack. I do think smokers ought to be considerate and strictly honor nonsmoking areas for this reason. That may be the only place an asthmatic person can go.


25 posted on 11/18/2014 7:48:11 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: LevinFan

“I don’t want, nor should have to share your cigarette”

Then get up and walk away. No one will stop you.


26 posted on 11/18/2014 7:49:29 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LevinFan

The dilution factors are far greater.


27 posted on 11/18/2014 7:50:21 AM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

” Then get up and walk away. No one will
stop you.”

And let the smokers determine where I can go in public? No. Smoker arrogance is responsible for no smoking laws. They want to disregard everyone else, then get mad when people say “Fine, then it is illegal.”

I still remember my mother refusing to roll down the car window, and now she makes noise about how laws stopping people from smoking around their kid is wrong. Of course, people like that forget the kid can’t even walk away.

Smoke yourself into oblivion for all I care. But in the war of rights between smokers and nonsmokers, smokers will lose.


28 posted on 11/18/2014 8:16:52 AM PST by LevinFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Of course Chem Trails are totally safe. :-)


29 posted on 11/18/2014 8:26:46 AM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

Only safe ting to smoke is tires.


30 posted on 11/18/2014 8:26:48 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1

Secondhand pot smoke can be detected in the blood of non pot smokers. It can cost you a job.


31 posted on 11/18/2014 8:29:10 AM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
What about vaporizers?

They are everywhere now (the pocket-sized kind that looks to be about the size of a thick marking pen).

My bro in law has one for liquid nicotine, and he now mixes his own flavors.

His last mix tasted like Cinnamon Toast Crunch Cereal.

32 posted on 11/18/2014 8:31:42 AM PST by T-Bone Texan (The time is now to form up into leaderless cells of 5 men or less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

‘That whiff of pot that drifts your way at a rock concert or outdoor event could damage your heart and blood vessels as much as secondhand cigarette smoke does,’

IE: Not at all! It has no effect on you, unless you have enough concentration to actually get a contact high.

More nanny state nonsense.


33 posted on 11/18/2014 8:32:09 AM PST by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre

The study is flawed. A pot smoker will smoke one joint and that’s it the whole night. At least the ones I know. I do not find the pot smoke all that unpleasant.
Cigarette smokers tend to smoke one after another. Especially when drinking in a social setting. Cig smoke is off the scale unpleasant compared to pot.
My experience and my opion.


34 posted on 11/18/2014 8:33:50 AM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

There was a time, long ago, when secondhand pipe tobacco smoke was thought by many to be quite pleasant.

Pipe smokers were thought of as rather intellectual & their presence at gatherings was not unwelcome to most.

Anyway, I sat on admin separation boards in the Army & when someone who tested hot for MJ tried to argue it was secondhand MJ smoke from a party, we got the Aberdeen testing lab on speakerphone (aka `the impregnable fortress of urine’) & they informed us it was impossible to raise THC presence to detectable levels due to secondhand MJ smoke.


35 posted on 11/18/2014 8:34:34 AM PST by elcid1970 ("I am a radicalized infidel.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
after a half-hour of exposure to secondhand marijuana smoke

If the marijuana smoke is really secondhand, I think the grad studentwho had to smoke it and exhale into the rat cage for a half hour shoukd be studied.

36 posted on 11/18/2014 9:00:31 AM PST by KarlInOhio (The IRS: either criminally irresponsible in backup procedures or criminally responsible of coverup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasCajun
From the ingredients in cigarettes, I would think cigarette smoke has far more bad chemicals than pot smoke?

Especially since cigarette smokers smoke many cigarettes per day... perhaps 20 or more. Most normal pot smokers (not including total drug head addicts) would only be consuming perhaps one or two joints, and perhaps only on a Friday evening or something.

37 posted on 11/18/2014 9:01:14 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

Primary danger of second hand pot fumes is you will get just enough to test positive. Many times I’ve walked down a hotel hallway. By the time you can smell it, a sensitive test can pick it up. Another reason I object to mandatory pee-in-a-bottle tests for employment. I will not take a job mandating such tests.


38 posted on 11/18/2014 9:06:17 AM PST by Barkeep99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar

Secondhand pot smoke can be detected in the blood of non pot smokers. It can cost you a job.

<><><>

And let me guess, it was the fired person stating that it was only secondhand pot smoke. That they never smoked it themselves.

the most prominent story I found online about this just did not pass the sniff test. I’ve known couples where one smokes pot and the other doesn’t. The one who doesn’t NEVER hangs out in the same room as the one who does while the deed is being done.


39 posted on 11/18/2014 9:27:19 AM PST by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Good one.


40 posted on 11/18/2014 10:30:37 AM PST by elhombrelibre (Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson