[Diogenesis]

One doubts that the DNC and Soros messed up
their “calibrations” in Texas.

All fraud comes from Holder and the DO”J” in their
now systematic election fraud to continue their
attacks on the American people, the Constitution and Law.

[samtheman]

Orwell was by far the greatest political prognosticator of the 20th century.

[TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed]

Now they know what it is like to be a conservative voting in Minnesota.

[buffyt]

A Conservative Republican Tea Party candidate won Wendy Davis old seat in the Texas Senate!

[Kozak]

Somebody needs to go back to school for some instruction in logic....

[Squantos]

Vespa ...... presstitute.

[Heart of Georgia]

Deem the vote?

[trebb]

As RH Reality Check’s Andrea Grimes reports, their votes were solidly in Davis’ favor: 94 percent of black women and 61 percent of Latinas voted for her. Only 32 percent of white women did.

So, 94% of Black women want to stop their family lines dead and 61% of Latinas want the same. It makes me feel dirty to say it, but it might help solve our problems...

[Gaffer]

I guess it makes about as much sense as saying she lost because the Republicans Gerrymandered the voting districts......

[AppyPappy]

“I am well aware that Wendy Davis lost the Texas governor’s race by a wide margin. It’s salt in a very personal wound.”

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

[RayChuang88]

In the end, Davis lost because her campaign ran on one note: abortion. While popular with some people in Texas, the overwhelming majority of voters rejected that. And the voters did not like the fact Davis was highly beholden to the Hollywood Left, either.

[NTHockey]

What about the blue eyed pygmy vote? Were their votes “erased?”

Really, we can splinter the country into a million groups and subgroups (and subgroups of groups) all day long. IT DOESN’T MATTER. What matters is who got the most votes.

[Arthur McGowan]

Sometime—most of the time—what a leftist is saying is so stupid, it takes tremendous effort to believe that what he’s really saying. All this idiot is really saying is that when the left loses—racism!

I love the point about how the “winner” is the person who got the most votes!

BTW: Notice that NO reporter EVER has asked Algore the following questions:

What was the temperature of the Earth 20 years ago?

What is the temperature of the Earth now?

What is the correct temperature of the Earth?

[texas booster]

...while white folks vote a straight “I got mine” party ticket...

Is it just me or is this one of the most stupid, racist statements of the whole hit piece?

[HotHunt]

Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, with these dog-whistle, race baiters is about race. Just as back in the 60's they used to say that hippies looked at everything through rose-colored glasses, these race hustlers look at everything through "black-colored" glasses. Eric Holder is a prime example of this.

[NativeSon]

This sounds like the need for an election "curve"'or "handicap" to be used when the number of white women voters outnumbers non white women voters.

Maybe white women will have their votes valued at three fifths so as to not erase the votes of other women...

[madprof98]

. . . people of color have stood up for reproductive rights . . .

More accurate to say that they stand in line for abortions at Planned Parenthood mills because normal family life has collapsed among the castes enslaved to big government.

[texican01]

Cutting through the pseudo intellectual political analysis, most Texans view “baby butchers” as really nasty bitches! Evil people like Wendy Davis ensure that most of us vote “straight ticket Republican” It helps insure that one does not accidently vote for an abortionist, pervert, brazen thief or agent of Al Queda.

[tx_eggman]

Posted this yesterday, it still cracks me up

The money quote from Derek Hunter's Townhall article today:

The only consolation for Wendy Davis is she got more votes than MSNBC has viewers, so when they finally fire Ronan Farrow she can boast of a larger possible audience than the network currently has.

[tanknetter]

As RH Reality Check’s Andrea Grimes reports, their votes were solidly in Davis’ favor: 94 percent of black women and 61 percent of Latinas voted for her. Only 32 percent of white women did. That’s certainly not enough women to say that Abbott won the whole gender (though that’s a ludicrous statement in the first place). It seems to be enough, though, to result in the erasure of votes from women of color, Grimes notes:

Quite possibly the most convoluted and contrived post-election analytical reasoning.

The CNN polls sited don't go into multiple breakdowns. They don't show white men, or latino men or black men either. They do show that while Abbott won whites by a significant margin (70%+) he only won women by 52%. The conclusion that he rec'd overwhelming support of white women and lost latino and black women by significant % is, well, obvious to anyone with a basic understanding of statistics.

So what we're really seeing here is 1) the lamentation of people who aren't really capable of a little thing called "extrapolation" (or don't think that their audience is) wanting things explained at an in-your-face level of obviousness and 2) the continuation, and expansion of the whole "vote shaming" thing we saw starting a few weeks out from the election.

On that latter note, it's important to look at the Andrea Grimes article cited. In it she makes the statement that white women "failed" Davis. Classic identity politics shaming/intimidation tactic. Women are supposed to vote for women (or, at least, Democrat women) because they're ... women.

So the proper way to view this pap is as political advocacy masking itself as analysis, NOT as reasonable/logical analysis.