Could non-citizens decide the November election?

Washington Compost ^ | OCTOBER 24, 2014 | Jesse Richman and David Earnest

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Could control of the Senate in 2014 be decided by illegal votes cast by non-citizens? Some argue that incidents of voting by non-citizens are so rare as to be inconsequential, with efforts to block fraud a screen for an agenda to prevent poor and minority voters from exercising the franchise, while others define such incidents as a threat to democracy itself. Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

It's the entire reason the border is wide open.

[stephenjohnbanker]

YEP

[WayneS]

YES THEY CAN!!!

[Vigilanteman]

Why not? One of their own is El Presidente.

[Slyfox]

Control of the Senate could be determined by illegal votes cast by non-citizens and ballots stuffed by Obama’s community organizers.

[Cowboy Bob]

The Republicans need to scream about vote fraud. Put the democrats on notice. Maybe people should tweet #DemocratVoteFraud every time they witness the Democrats trying to pull something.

Need to shine the light on the Democrats. Let the cockroaches scurry back into the shadows.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

The Community Organizers Formerly Known as ACORN.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

They can’t. The USSC won’t let them.

http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114

[SgtHooper]

After all, that is the whole plan—amnesty for illegal aliens and the right by the illegal aliens to vote.

[FlingWingFlyer]

I hate it that my America has become the world’s newest banana republic with “elections” that are a joke. I liked it better when Americans and not foreigners selected who was going to represent them. I think I’m going to rent a clown suit to wear to the polls.

[Cowboy Bob]

The RNC can’t do it, but you and I can!

[Paulie]

For sure. And for a little insurance, the Dems also have the cemetery vote, the multiple vote, and the Panthers to intimidate everyone else.

[Steely Tom]

Both sides depend more heavily on anecdotes than data.

The "war on women" charge depends entirely on anecdotes. So does pretty much every other charge made by Democrats against Republicans.

Since when does the Washington Post have a problem with "anecdotes?"

What was Sandra Fluke all about?

[spodefly]

The whole and entire purpose of the deliberate illegal alien invasion is to change the electoral and demographic future of the country. Ask Valerie Jarrett.

It also gives legal citizens a moral reason to fight using any means necessary against the social engineers as well as the invaders.

And that day is fast approaching, especially if this election can be shown to hinge on illegal votes.

[rawcatslyentist]

>""Could non-citizens decide the November election?"

Why not? We have one for president right now.

[bgill]

That’s the plan.

[RIghtwardHo]

No.

[Tailback]

Si sue puede!

[fhayek]

What are the 'anecdotes' they refer to? What? When there is a close election, mysteriously, bundles of uncounted 'votes' are discovered in the dead of night, and even more mysteriously, they are overwhelmingly (if not exclusively) Democrat votes.
Or, what about entire prescints that vote 100% for Democrats?
Or precincts that have more votes counted than there are people registered to vote?
Or Democrat operatives that just happen to have Vote-a-matic machines in their trunk?
Or injunctions that prevent the purging of voter rolls of dead voters?

And those are just for starters. The Compost is saying both sides have an equivalent case - anecdotal. I have yet to hear of one case where a person was denied the franchise to vote. Conservatives have even offered guaranties that would make Voter ID without cost to the voter. It is all a leftist smokescreen, and the Compost knows it.

[PROCON]

I’m sure the dead vote will go heavily democratic too.