Posted on 10/23/2014 7:11:56 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
The purpose of the media is not inform the citizenry of current events so they can be informed participants of the Republic.The purpose of the media is to guide the thoughts and emotions of the masses.It is vital that the party and state have the monopoly on all sources of information. This is necessary in order to direct the masses to serve the party and state effectively.Those who support the party and state are to upheld as possessing the highest virtue and values.Anyone opposing the party and state are to be portrayed as either evil capitalists plundering the workers or to be held up to ridicule as foolish impediments to the advance of the progressive march to the socialist utopia.
Yep. And I guess I’ve met a lot more people in life who are like the Palin family than I have who act like Biden and his ilk.
Sorry, the author’s first comments lost me. He maybe sitting in on “The View” next.
She'll marry when and if she is ready. I am not saying all men are jerks, I know they are not, but many are. The "father" of her child comes to mind. Especially men her age. Young men are less mature then she is at this point in her life. She's chosen a tough road, but she's Sarah's "mini me", she'll be fine.
What the heck is going on in this article? I just read Bristol’s account on FB this morning and it was nothing like this excerpt from Andrew Sullivan’s blog. She said nothing about wearing a “thong dress,” she did not say she was dragged anywhere (she was pushed to the ground) and she only quoted one “F” word.
What am I not getting?
Nailed it. I questioned Palin's credentials when she came on the scene. But she had more executive experience then McCain, Biden and Obama, combined! And she was a breathe of fresh air; she actually became a voice for many people who vote republican and who were being ignored by the establishment.
What's with the "C. W.?" Does he have two middle names? Or is one of the initials meaningless, like "Harry S. Truman" - "S" for nothing?
And what's with the extraneous "e" at the end of Cook(e). Is his real name "Cookie," - yeah, "Charles. C. W. Cookie?"
Snob. Snot. Self-satisfied Liberal.
Mr. Cookie, I don't give a rat's a$$ if you like Sarah Palin or not.
I do. I think she would have made a fine Vice president.
I think she will make an excellent President.
Charlie.. I mean Mr. Cookie says he is a conservative, so I guess we have to pretend along with him the way we are supposed to if he wears a dress and asks us to call him Charlene.
How many actual conservatives still write for RINO Review? 2?
You aren’t getting that you are allowed and expected to make things up about the Palins to hate on.
I’m still confused, though. Who made up these quotes from Bristol? This NR writer or Andrew Sullivan? Both are pukes, by the way.
Yet at the same time he is pointing out the disparate treatment, he spares no ink on trashing Sarah and the family along the way. And, FWIW, excepting one f-bomb, those words weren’t Bristol’s, they were the words of her attacker: Ray Rice plus the profanity.
My money would be on one of those Alaskan Palin-hater blogs and Sullivan reprinting their spew and getting believed by “ordinary” pukes like this Cookie guy
Bidens son doesn’t have a reality show, appear on TV shows, and doesn’t get into nasty divorces. Palins need to go away.
“All in all, I can think of few people in public life who have been as disgracefully hounded as has Palin;”
Isn’t that the truth! Why? It all started with that witch Katie Couric and went downhill from there.
You didn’t like her, Charles? At all? Even right after she was nominated? Seriously? There’s admitting against interest, and then there’s telling people you’re a clueless fool. And Andrew, if the prospect of Sarah Palin being president, or one heartbeat away from it, still disturbs you more than the reality of the two incumbent arseclowns, just shhhhh, okay? (And blogging the voices inside your head without checking the facts they’re telling you is still not journalism.)
The lying flaming queer Andrew Sullivan severely misquoted Bristol Palin in his article, then the lying flaming queer Charles C. W. Cooke used Andrew Sullivan's misquoted script in his follow-up article.
This has been the habit of the lying mutant faggots from the day Sarah Palin's was selected for the VP spot on the Republican ticket in 2008.
Cooke linked to Sullivan's lies, and Sullivan's lying article linked to a fabricated screed from Talking Points Memo which claimed to be writing a "transcript of the highlights" from something or other, except they are quoting each other's fabrications of garbage that was never said.
That's just what twinkies do. They lie. They pretend. They have to, because they are just empty shells of what might have once been human; spiritually dead, mutant zombie vampires, trying to pretend to be humans. They are not.
I just listened to Bristol’s comments to the police. These quotes, unfortunately, about a thong dress and F words were accurate. She seemed very upset while being interviewed. Just needed to correct my original comment.
“...the man who is second in line to the presidency...”
So, just who is first in line to the presidency, Charles?
Fool!
Do you have a link to Bristol’s comments to the police?
Chuck, nothing you could write after that has any meaning to me.
You don't like her or her family, but damn if you didn't just get paid to write an article involving her.
Poser.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.