Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Criminalizing Innocent Christian Behavior
Townhall.com ^ | October 21, 2014 | David Limbaugh

Posted on 10/21/2014 5:04:53 AM PDT by Kaslin

Where are all the atheist freedom lovers we always hear about? It's time for them to start standing up for religious liberty.

The left and militant gay movement are getting bolder and bolder, and too many Christians are stewing in their apathy.

It seems that with each passing month, this senseless tyranny advances. The latest is that two Christian ministers in Idaho, Donald and Evelyn Knapp, have allegedly been ordered to perform same-sex wedding ceremonies at their chapel or face fines or jail sentences.

This nightmare began Oct. 7, when the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals invalidated Idaho's marriage laws and legalized same-sex marriage in that state, which allowed Idaho county clerks to begin issuing same-sex marriage licenses a week later. On Oct. 17, the Knapps declined a request to perform a same-sex wedding ceremony.

According to a lawsuit filed by the Knapps, the city of Coeur d'Alene is "unconstitutionally coercing" them to perform these weddings at their Hitching Post Wedding Chapel in violation of their religious beliefs, their ordination vows and their consciences. City Ordinance Section 9.56 bars sexual orientation discrimination in public accommodations, which forces the Knapps to choose between betraying their religious convictions and following them and facing up to 180 days in jail and up to $1,000 in fines. According to their complaint, they arguably commit a separate and distinct misdemeanor each day they refuse to perform such ceremonies, with the potential criminal penalties piling up cumulatively.

Let's not brush over this as if it's an immaterial matter to the Knapps or other Christians. Their belief in marriage as between one man and one woman is deeply rooted in their biblical faith -- and not just in the Old Testament, as some have speciously argued.

When the Pharisees asked Jesus whether it is lawful to divorce one's wife for any cause, he replied, "Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, 'Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh'?" (Matthew 19:4-5). Jesus was quoting Genesis 1:27, lest there be any confusion that there is conflict between the testaments.

The point isn't whether you or I believe this, though I do. It's whether the Knapps believe it -- and they do. Their attorneys' complaint clearly states that they "are ordained Christian ministers who believe biblical marriage is good for society. Not only have they been happily married for 47 years, they have married roughly 35,000 couples and seen countless lives blessed through marriage. As ordained ministers, the Knapps believe God called them to promote the welfare of their community by uniting others in marriage. ... Because their religious beliefs affect everything they do, the Knapps and Hitching Post, LLC only perform wedding ceremonies consistent with their religious beliefs."

Is that good enough for you? For our society? For the city of Coeur d'Alene? For the state of Idaho? For the United States of America?

In the old cases involving Jehovah's Witnesses saluting the flag and young men declaring themselves conscientious objectors to the draft, the question was the sincerity of their beliefs. But increasingly in our society, the sacred and not-so-sacred beliefs of everyone but Christians are protected while Christians are deemed intolerant pariahs who must be forced to conform to behavior repugnant to their beliefs.

Notice who the aggressors are here. Notice who is being intolerant. Why can't same-sex couples who want to marry under the newly minted law find ministers who have no objection to the procedure? Are they seeking the vindication of their rights or trying to force their beliefs on other people to the point of compelling them to deny their own?

Unless we have lost our collective mind and the state of Idaho and federal government have cashiered their respective constitutions, this can't conceivably be a close case. As the complaint states, the ordinance is unconstitutional as applied to the Knapps, as it violates their right to free speech, their free exercise of religion, their right to equal protection under the law, their due process rights and the applicable Idaho statute, the Free Exercise of Religion Protected Act.

Do you remember when many of us warned that the same-sex marriage movement wasn't just about living and letting live, that it would inevitably encroach on the religious liberties of Christians and others who don't agree with this newly created institution? We also warned that this would involve not just societal pressure but the power of state coercion, and we're already here. The left's denials that religious liberty was in jeopardy were as trustworthy as President Obama's assurances that Obamacare would not violate the conscience rights of religious groups -- which is to say, not at all.

The sheer acceleration of the left's militancy should horrify people. Just last week, these actions seemed like a realistic but distant threat, but today they're already happening.

Many of us keep warning our fellow Christians (and other freedom lovers) that their apathy and refusal to fight for their rights in the public square is going to bite them where it hurts. Could it be that this, along with other disturbing developments around the country, will wake them up? We shall see.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; homosexualagenda; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 10/21/2014 5:04:53 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The wife purporting to be a minister is already anti-Scriptural so why are they kicking at sliding further down the slippery slope they fashioned for themselves?

I just took my asbestos undies out of the dryer so bring it on, closeted FR libs that can’t understand basic Biblical truth.


2 posted on 10/21/2014 5:18:51 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I remember back in in the 80s when the homos were up in arms b/c the govt was intruding in their PRIVATE lives (sodomy was still a crime). Haven’t things changed. Now they’re OK w/ using the govt to bully those refusing to validate their perversions.


3 posted on 10/21/2014 5:20:08 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I wonder how this ties in with the Benghazi hearings? Or maybe it’s the IRS or VA scandals it has something to do with.


4 posted on 10/21/2014 5:28:37 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (Texas isn't just a state. It's a state of mind!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If they preform gay marriages, they should read what the Bible says about it. See if any of the rest of the First Amendment has been voided?


5 posted on 10/21/2014 5:30:18 AM PDT by Daveinyork ( Marbury vs.Madison was the biggest power grab in American history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

They can force Christian Pastors to perform same sex weddings but they can’t force TV sports announcers to say Redskins or force stores to sell Redskin jerseys… Hmmm…


6 posted on 10/21/2014 5:56:16 AM PDT by Heartlander (Prediction: Increasingly, logic will be seen as a covert form of theism. - Denyse OÂ’Leary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So, what prominent media figure is finally going to “get it” and have the guts to step up and “say it” -

CRIMINALIZATION OF CHRISTIANITY IS THE WHOLE POINT
of the homosexual rights movement.


7 posted on 10/21/2014 5:58:01 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daveinyork

“what the Bible says about it” = “hate speech”.

Already punishable in Canada.


8 posted on 10/21/2014 5:58:46 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The most insane thing is this is a DEEP RED state. Where are Wasden and Otter?! Nowhere. Their performance is pathetic. Repuke governors do literally nothing to protect people from even blatant tyranny like this.


9 posted on 10/21/2014 6:29:42 AM PDT by Viennacon (Obola is a muslim terrorist & his viral illegals need to be deported NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Atheist freedom lovers? Where are all the Christian pastor freedom lovers?


10 posted on 10/21/2014 7:14:16 AM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

Deep Red can be purple with Deep Blue Judges. When the people vote as a majority to uphold that marriage is between one man and one woman, courts have been the one to overturn the people’s votes!

Again, just get a lawyer-judge relationship that is solid and you can overturn and/or get $$$$$$ for anything. Just hang your morals and ethics at your front door of your home on the way to court...


11 posted on 10/21/2014 7:21:37 AM PDT by YouGoTexasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

Good post T.


12 posted on 10/21/2014 8:10:53 AM PDT by Bullpine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It appears that this is all being done proactively, as no complaint has been filed against the Knapps.

Interestingly, it’s also been reported that, up until a week or so ago, The Hitching Post’s website indicated “We also perform wedding ceremonies of other faiths as well as civil weddings.” That language has since been removed. That would not sit well in court. It could be seen as an indication that they were willing to perform various types of ceremonies...including civil....until same-sex marriage was legalized. Only at that time did they begin to refuse civil (non-religious) ceremonies. This could be interpreted as animus toward same-sex couples.

It will also be insightful to find out if they made that change themselves or were advised to do so by some 3rd party...like...ADF?


13 posted on 10/21/2014 9:39:56 AM PDT by TomRath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson