Skip to comments.
Hillary Clinton, Mitt Romney leading the 2016 field
washingtonexaminer ^
| Published October 19, 2014
| Kelly Cohen
Posted on 10/19/2014 5:34:48 PM PDT by BenLurkin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
To: CyberAnt
Exactly what are you butting about with your buts?
61
posted on
10/19/2014 6:33:20 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: CyberAnt
However, the psalm that states that the earth is the Lord’s was written WELL after the fall. You are going to have to try harder to calumny the Lord.
62
posted on
10/19/2014 6:34:17 PM PDT
by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: kaehurowing
I will go fish. No Romney. He is a Rino— not a conservative. He will never win my state. 6 million of us stayed home— It will go to 10 million. He is a Morman and we dont do Mormans— absolutely get him off the stage. He blew his shot real bad. NOT AGAIN!!
To: CyberAnt
” I believe Ted Cruz will be the nominee and even if Hillary runs .. she can never outrun Ted “
This is the same wishful thinking where many kept hoping that Sarah Palin will run for president and refused to support any viable Republican candidate and we ended up with Obama.
Might as well get ready for Hillary with this same kind of thinking...
64
posted on
10/19/2014 6:45:40 PM PDT
by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: Bettyprob
Romney is not going to run, and he’s not going to be the GOP’s presidential nominee ever again.”
I totally agree.
65
posted on
10/19/2014 6:47:51 PM PDT
by
Innovative
("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
To: svcw
I thought the head of that clan GOP_LADY was banned so there should be no more Romeny cheerleaders right?
To: Blue Highway
67
posted on
10/19/2014 7:06:18 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Not 'hope and change' but 'dopes in chains')
To: BenLurkin
Get ready for president Clinton then...
This guy couldn’t even best Obola.
68
posted on
10/19/2014 7:13:00 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Dunam, Duncan, man what infections these folks brought over.)
To: lightman
I'm not endorsing the idea, merely explaining the interpersonal dynamics behind his relationship with the widely stupid and theater driven electorate.
Endorsing Romney is like saying "We're sorry, and we need to make it right", but the public doesn't want to do the heavy lifting of finding a new guy when Romney will do.
69
posted on
10/19/2014 7:14:37 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: COBOL2Java
the point is, it’s the voters, period - not some back room filled with smoke in a DC warehouse.....
To: lightman
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3217236/posts
Right on cue.
71
posted on
10/19/2014 7:17:55 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: BenLurkin
My choice for 2016 is a 100% favorite: LEAVE THE COUNTRY
To: BenLurkin
The Bishop RomneyCARE and Rove will DECREASE
the voting in two weeks .... as is their plan.
73
posted on
10/19/2014 7:46:19 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
(The EXEMPT Congress is complicit in the absence of impeachment)
To: blackdog
Romney is the most outwardly presidential politician in front of a camera. Americans miss someone presidential. Even the hood rats have had their belly full of a community activist in chief as their president.
So, when did it become "Presidential" to support the following?
1. Abortion
2. Gay Agenda
3. Global Warming
4. Amnesty
5. Socialized Medicine.
74
posted on
10/19/2014 7:49:11 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: C. Edmund Wright
a poll at this juncture is LESS THAN MEANINGLESS - and yep, it’s a Freep orgy of bitterness and despair. Dead on the money, C.E.
The whole point of this article is to divide and demoralize conservatives.
75
posted on
10/19/2014 7:49:26 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: Innovative; CyberAnt
This is the same wishful thinking where many kept hoping that Sarah Palin will run for president and refused to support any viable Republican candidate and we ended up with Obama.
Might as well get ready for Hillary with this same kind of thinking...
Right on cue, our resident GOP-E Booster, Innovative, comes along and tells us we have to settle for someone like Romney, anybody but a conservative.
If this was 1979, he'd be saying the same thing about Reagan.
I wonder how much the GOP-E is paying him to come here to spew this garbage.
He/she/it is truly the chaff among the wheat.
76
posted on
10/19/2014 7:55:01 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Windflier
The whole point of this article is to divide and demoralize conservatives. So was anyone else smart enough to figure that out?
To: Innovative
so not Romney and not Cruz.
Who then?
To: SoConPubbie
Since we had citizens who think it is.
Are we trying to change our politicians instead of changing our convictions to be something better? (and I am referring to the masses)
Politicians only tap into what they think the people want.
79
posted on
10/19/2014 8:15:22 PM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: blackdog
Politicians only tap into what they think the people want.
You forgot those with money that will do everything in their power to game the system to their advantage like the GOP-E and the Chamber of Commerce.
That is the main reason we got Romney.
There was 100 million+ of eligible voters WHO DID NOT VOTE in 2008 and 2012.
The choices they had in both election for POTUS were miserable.
In 2012 especially, it was almost a distinction without difference.
You put up a REAL Republican(Which Romney was not), better yet, a conservative, and watch what happens.
80
posted on
10/19/2014 8:18:26 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson