Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The case for voting Republicans, even those you think are Rinos
10/18/2014 | chrisnj

Posted on 10/18/2014 4:45:34 AM PDT by chrisnj

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 761-767 next last
To: VRWC For Truth

Fact: A conservative Reagan type hasn’t touched the White House in 26 years
Fact: The electorate has shifted and Reagan today would not have seen the White House
Fact: I have voted for the primary winning Republican every time
Fact: my vote for the primary winning Republican guarunteed Odumbo wouldn’t see office
Fact: your continual protests to not vote Republican guaruntees a counter to my vote.
Fact: I can thank you for the shambles we are in and placing our present occupant in office
Fact: I think strategically long term...Purists think he in the now and lose every time short term
how


181 posted on 10/18/2014 6:33:23 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Small yes I didn’t say not large enough to sway an election, which is the point this entire thread has been making.

Elections have consequences and we have been living the reality of 2008 and 2012 where the small minority chose to vote poorly or not vote at all.


182 posted on 10/18/2014 6:33:24 AM PDT by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

Demographics is destiny.


183 posted on 10/18/2014 6:34:09 AM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

I would guess that most of the FR purists have a posting history that looks just like yours.

Lamenting that the country is lost and how only SHTF can straighten things out on one thread, then lecturing us on political strategy on the next.

You can take some solace in the fact that you’re not alone in your nitwittery.


184 posted on 10/18/2014 6:34:15 AM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard

Well what do you call pretending liberalism is conservative? I say childish. Ergo, if one mans up he leaves childish things behind.


185 posted on 10/18/2014 6:34:22 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: uncitizen

They are working in a very hostile environment - the media burying them at every turn. I know: either you are principled or you are not, but that is easy said than done.
I still think humans are weak. Congressmen are humans. They are influenced and slowly drift to the left, especially if they don’t get the votes from their own constituents. We keep letting the Dems elected either intentionally or otherwise. We are contributing to the current Dem majority and control. Once they are in control, it is even harder for any Rep, principled or not, to fight them. If they are always the minority due to our own actions, they are more apt to become more like the dems, and we don’t shoulder some of the blames, rather we just blame them and not do anything to help.


186 posted on 10/18/2014 6:34:29 AM PDT by chrisnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: VRWC For Truth

The GOPe has shown itself to be liberal. I don’t think they have gone all the way to ‘progressive’ yet, because I see ‘progressivism’ to be a direct heir of Stalinism. Liberalism, though, is also a terrible disease, and I wouldn’t ever trust a liberal with my government.


187 posted on 10/18/2014 6:35:18 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297

Fact, your long term strategy resulted in a GOP that just said that voting for them means amnesty.


188 posted on 10/18/2014 6:35:34 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: lexington minuteman 1775
So Rinos and Dems can spend eternity in hell

They may or may not spend eternity in hell, but if we fall for your approach, they certainly will in Washington.

189 posted on 10/18/2014 6:36:15 AM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Yardstick

I wuv you too woogums. No go help pass Amnesty...no matter what. There are plenty of healthy kids out there that need diseases.


190 posted on 10/18/2014 6:36:50 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
-- Once we get rid of spineless conservatives, and get rid of RINOs, then we will have a real Congressional majority. Won't we. --

I'm going to paraphrase this conversation from the top.

I categorized republicans who turn liberal (Specter, Crist, numerous others) as "spineless conservatives." And, I said that spineless conservatives ought to be removed from office.

And your rebuttal is that we (I assume you mean conservatives) will have a real congressional majority after that.

Well, no. The only way to have a congressional majority of conservatives is to elect conservatives to congress, until they number in the majority. That becomes impossible if either no conservative is running, or if the general public rejects conservative principles.

I am not buying a contention that a Republican majority results in a constitution-abiding/conservative Congress.

191 posted on 10/18/2014 6:36:52 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Friend, how do you think the Left got to where they are today? They did so through incrementalism, over a period of many decades. In the 1960's, had they tried to get all of their agenda implemented at once, the American voter would have rejected them completely. The Left, understanding the art of politics better than those on the right, adapted the strategy of incrementalism: take what you can get now and come back in two years to get more. It has worked terrifically well for them. Now, they have almost full control of everything... the light of liberty/patriotism is flickering, nearly extinguished.

What I am saying is that we on the right need to understand the concept on incrementalism, and use it to our advantage too. We are never going to get 100% of what we want right away (just as it was with the Left in the 1960's). We need to chip away. Take what we can get now (e.g. vote for a candidate who is with us most of the time to remove a politican who is against us 100% of the time) and come back in two years for more.
192 posted on 10/18/2014 6:37:03 AM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
They may or may not spend eternity in hell, but if we fall for your approach, they certainly will in Washington.

Hell, Washington....what's the difference?

193 posted on 10/18/2014 6:37:31 AM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

We purists are willing to go down to 80% of what we want. How low is acceptable to you before we are no longer conservative at all?


194 posted on 10/18/2014 6:39:21 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yup...a flawed immigration policy will do that...the effective dumbing down of the population is almost complete :-)


195 posted on 10/18/2014 6:39:51 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Well, against Al Gore and John Kerry, he didn't have to go "conservative" in order to distinguish himself from his opponent.

He governed as a liberal, IMO.

196 posted on 10/18/2014 6:40:01 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Jarhead9297
Yup...a flawed immigration policy will do that...the effective dumbing down of the population is almost complete :-)

And both parties were complicit.

It's at the point where shifting the party in power is akin to rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.

197 posted on 10/18/2014 6:41:13 AM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

Dan you have the post of the day and have expressed what many on our side has been unable to do succinctly...thank you


198 posted on 10/18/2014 6:41:50 AM PDT by Jarhead9297
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart; All

Just wanted to point out that about 200 posts in, not one GOP supporter, including the OP, will address the fact that the GOP promised Amnesty in exchange for gaining power this election.


199 posted on 10/18/2014 6:42:44 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Dan in Wichita

We were chipping away with Reagan, but Reagan himself made the fatal mistake, having Bush for his VP. The chipping away ended when he left office.


200 posted on 10/18/2014 6:43:04 AM PDT by dfwgator (The "Fire Muschamp" tagline is back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 761-767 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson