Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Hillary is going to win’ in 2016, says Warren Buffett
marketwatch ^ | 10/7/14 | Robert Schroeder

Posted on 10/07/2014 1:05:56 PM PDT by illiac

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) — The presidential election of 2016 is already wrapped up, says Warren Buffett. And the winner is: Hillary Clinton.

“Hillary is going to run,” the Berkshire Hathaway CEO said Tuesday at a Fortune magazine conference. He added: “Hillary is going to win.”

Buffett was so confident the former secretary of state would win the White House that he said he would bet money on it. The famed investor was less confident, however, about who Clinton would face if she decides to run.

“I don’t know,” he said about a potential Republican challenger for Clinton.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2016prediction; elections; hillary; hillary2016; hillaryprediction; president
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
To: oblomov

Investigating him for insider trading for once would be nice.


61 posted on 10/07/2014 1:46:04 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Obama Will Say 'War on Women' But Not 'War on ISIS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: illiac

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

62 posted on 10/07/2014 1:48:00 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Yep, just wait, starting after the midterms it will begin. She is going to base her entire campaign on having ovaries and that she is “for the women and children” and all the zombie women will eat it up even though the bitch has the resume of massively screwing up every single job she’s ever held in her life. Like my brother says “Hillary becoming President would be like nuking the Titanic as it’s sinking”. So true.


63 posted on 10/07/2014 1:49:54 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (Obama Will Say 'War on Women' But Not 'War on ISIS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker





64 posted on 10/07/2014 1:53:05 PM PDT by mountn man (The Pleasure You Get From Life Is Equal To The Attitude You Put Into It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Yup. Fauxchahontas. She satisfies both the far-lefty impulses of the Democrat base, and the greater national trend towards raging populism.


65 posted on 10/07/2014 1:53:44 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: illiac

FU, Warren !


66 posted on 10/07/2014 2:07:28 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: illiac

Hillary is going to win in 2016, but it’s going to be at the America Has Talent show where she is going to juggle chickens.


67 posted on 10/07/2014 2:07:37 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: illiac

It won’t be the first time Buffet was wrong.


68 posted on 10/07/2014 2:09:08 PM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Non military personnel should not be allowed to run for President, the only exception being Governors.... who have overseen the National Guard in their states, giving them military knowledge and experience.

Natural born citizens only.


69 posted on 10/07/2014 2:16:41 PM PDT by Kackikat (Two wrongs do NOT make a right.... unless you are a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: illiac

Warren “Three Million Abortions” Buffett wants *more* abortions...


70 posted on 10/07/2014 2:16:46 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: illiac

He needs Hillary to block the Keystone Pipeline so his rail oil cars can bring in the Alberta oil and make him richer.


71 posted on 10/07/2014 2:26:36 PM PDT by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

The press is already putting the Clinton’s forward as the “responsible” candidate. We have had a lot of soft ads here in Iowa about Hill and Bill.

Now, the funny thing is she was supposed to be the queen eight years ago.


72 posted on 10/07/2014 2:27:49 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

BINGO!!!


73 posted on 10/07/2014 2:32:30 PM PDT by 4yearlurker (Some people say that experts agree!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Your post is concise and spot on. But I would note....

John McCain was once a great war hero, but since then has been a joke (they were kinda close on that one...)

Before McCain won the nomination they went on and on about how much McCain was a 'Maverick' because he didn't go along with the Rs and was willing to 'work with the other side of the isle'. They obviously were trying to help him win the nomination and then when he did they turned on him like rabid dogs.

Not that I care anything at all about McCain, just always know that whatever the left says they are always practicing their religion and their religion is Marxist/communist politics.

74 posted on 10/07/2014 2:33:08 PM PDT by Bullish (You ever notice that liberalism really just amounts to anti-morality?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat

I 100% agree

The U.S. Constitution needs to be changed to reflect that only those that have favorably served , in a command role , in the U.S. Armed Forces , should be eligible to serve as their Commander and Chief .


75 posted on 10/07/2014 2:33:28 PM PDT by LeoWindhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: illiac

He is correct.

It’s esay to split the conservative vote.

We fall divided .


76 posted on 10/07/2014 2:34:40 PM PDT by NoLibZone (The bad news: Hillary Clinton will be the next President. The Good news: Our principles are intact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thorvaldr
As one of the billionaire overload elite, he is in a position to tell us who will be the next president. After all the decision is entirely up to him.

I think that's been going on at least 20 years now. They're playing both parties for desired outcome either way. It seems to be a game of them picking their anointed one then backing an idiot no one wants in the other party. Of course they have a few middleman called sleazy lobbyist/strategist/fundraising pot passers/donation distributors/so called Party Spokespersons, which for a percentage fee on the donations help arrange our federal elections these days.

The GOP for example has not vetted a good candidate past the earlier held primaries since Ronald Reagan. Is that by accident or lack of good candidates? No! It's all planned out and we get the bottom of the barrel loyal to the elitist presidents, congressmen, and senators. Obama should have not lot to a Republican that is unless the GOP ran as big an Idiot. Either way they win.

Lot's of money at stake like stopping the Keystone pipeline, funding windmill turbines for windbag billionaires who "Invested" in wind turbines and want federal government "taxpayers help for the installation cost" just to name a couple of examples. I wonder how many of the Elite billionaires invested in the take the money and run Solar Energy Companies too?

77 posted on 10/07/2014 2:35:14 PM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kackikat
"Non military personnel should not be allowed to run for President, the only exception being Governors.... who have overseen the National Guard in their states, giving them military knowledge and experience."

No. This is not Sparta.

78 posted on 10/07/2014 2:39:46 PM PDT by Flag_This (You can't spell "treason" without the "O".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: LeoWindhorse

Read #78 What is Sparta about?


79 posted on 10/07/2014 2:44:16 PM PDT by Kackikat (Two wrongs do NOT make a right.... unless you are a Democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
I thought it was Faux-cahontas!

Howie Carr,a great local talk host and columnist here in Boston,coined that name and I liked it as soon as I heard it.And yes,Faux-cahontas is a good one too.They both refer to a creature even phonier and less qualified to be *dog catcher* than is our Community Organizer-In-Chief.

80 posted on 10/07/2014 2:46:02 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson