Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chinese father chops up daughter for being a family disappointment: police
New York Daily News ^ | September 25, 2014 | Deborah Hastings

Posted on 09/27/2014 9:32:47 PM PDT by KingofZion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: KingofZion

“...why do so many threads that have nothing to do with abortion evolve into lectures about them?”

I believe that there is a corollary to Godwin’s Law that addresses this phenomena.


41 posted on 09/28/2014 7:10:21 AM PDT by Trentamj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KingofZion
The dad in Wenzhou City said he strangled his daughter because she was doing poorly at school, according to authorities, Britain's Daily Mirror reported.

-

42 posted on 09/28/2014 7:14:55 AM PDT by Lazamataz (First we beat the Soviet Union. Then we became them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stanne
“...they care more about people engaging in intercourse without intent of pregnancy...”

Well, what’s intercourse for?

Considering the behavior of humans ever since humanity existed, I would say that the biological function of intercourse is the last thing on people's minds when they engage in that behavior. Since the evidence is that people will engage in intercourse no matter what--even if doing so can earn them a death sentence as is the case in Islamic countries--I'm perfectly okay with them taking precautions so as not to get pregnant. The way I see it, killing a baby is a far greater sin than engaging in conjugal relations with one's husband or fiance while using contraceptives.

43 posted on 09/28/2014 7:17:19 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
I've met several chinese classical music students who never heard of Bach. I don't think I can find an American classical music student or musician with this bizarre defect.

I went to the WWII museum in New Orleans with a Chinese woman. I'm no historian (hate history, actually), but I ended up explaining a whole lot of WWII history to her. She had no idea, for example, of why we had to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, of the Japanese culture that dictates that suicide is preferable to defeat.

44 posted on 09/28/2014 7:21:28 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
Birth control devalues marriage. Devalued marriage leads inexorably to abortion. Chemical birth control, the pill, sometimes prevents pregnancy by suppressing the cycle. Sometimes it kills the baby. Physical birth control by insertion of devices directly kills babies. Supporting birth control is supporting abortion and other societal murder of inconvenient people. People who say they distinguish are merely saying that their chosen method is superior to others’ methods and most would have no problem with an overt abortion should the chosen other method fail. After all, they tried to do it “right” and it didn’t work. Got to get rid of it somehow.

If implantation does not occur, there is no pregnancy. And there is absolutely no way that you will ever convince me that *preventing* life is equivalent to *taking* life. I am not capable of that kind of mental gymnastics. Furthermore, I think that equating the two is extremely counterproductive--after all, the majority of abortion clients are convinced that there is no difference, and believe that no baby exists until birth.

That's a weird idea, that somehow using birth control devalues marriage. Take a look at any couple married for decades, with two or three children. Do you seriously think that most of those decades were spent in a platonic relationship? Naw--they used contraceptives.

45 posted on 09/28/2014 7:28:13 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

This is why it is currently impossible to deal with abortion

Be logical Just for a second

People have their personal favorite birth control method and that is what is counted when it’s use is depicted as having a percentage of effectiveness or failure

Condoms are what let’s say 98% effective for the sake of the argument. I know they are not 100% effective

There is only one birth control method that is 100% effective, and it is not discussed as birth control at all. But factually that’s what it is

Condoms, when they work, are effective. But they can fail. Then there are the times when the couple who states they use condoms don’t use them.

What happens then? A welcoming of new life?


46 posted on 09/28/2014 7:53:37 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

Considering the behavior of humans since time began?

If you want to pretend that people have been acting this way since time began, you are in a fantasy world

For the past 50 years since birth control became socially acceptable we have a massive breakdown of marriage, family, gender, economics, virtue, morality and society

And we, like toddlers, pretend all of that is just coincidental

People in this case confuse desire with behavior.

And technological progress as progress of civilization. But it’s not

Until this time, women of a basic societal stature have not given men the time of day, who were not temperate gentlemen, who had no means of support, and would not have sex before marriage, and if so, on the sly, and in that case would consider what to do in case of pregnancy, including, and limited to, marriage. So they engaged in premarital sex

They call what women do now premarital sex. And people like you say of course you’re going to have sex whether you’re married or not people have always done it. It’s what sex is for

And that’s what people want to hear

From people who have no idea what it is they’re talking about


47 posted on 09/28/2014 8:08:17 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom

Chemical abortifacients prevent implantation. Sometimes. Sometimes they render the implanted embryo nonviable. And yes, you have used birth control and therefore it is Good. And my alcoholic nephew says his lifestyle id Good. Everybody does it so I do it so it must be Good. It must be in the Bible, somewhere.


48 posted on 09/28/2014 9:56:58 AM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: MarMema

I cannot visit the link...it’s too horrible to contemplate. How anyone can do such things is way beyond my comprehension.


49 posted on 09/28/2014 12:00:26 PM PDT by Aria ( 2008 & 2012 weren't elections - they were coups d’état .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stanne

You said birth control is abortion. That means you said condoms are abortion. Retract that or support it but don’t change the subject


50 posted on 09/28/2014 12:06:33 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fictional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Sutain,..Chopped Sutain?


51 posted on 09/28/2014 12:11:12 PM PDT by Safetgiver ( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Cite that and I’ll respond.


52 posted on 09/28/2014 12:21:45 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

The mindset of birth control certainly does lead to abortion.

What does one do when the birth control fails?


53 posted on 09/28/2014 12:24:15 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

The birth control mentality is the abortive mentality. The burden would be on you if you want to argue, to prove how it is not so

If you were to, just for an example of the mentality, which pretends all is fine because they would never have an abortion, ask a random sample of men how many of them did not have sex with women other than their wives you’d get a high percentage.

Then ask them how many took perfect care of birth control 100% of those times. Then ask how many are certain their sex partners did not have an abortion

Then ask, yourself, more than them, as you’ll be quite far from any truth at this juncture, how many have cared enough about it to have a clear conscience, or to stop using birth control and just welcome life

They don’t care. Birth control works for them and when it doesn’t, there’s abortion

Separate the two.

Same with women they have the control. They can say, what are you crazy? You want to be the father of my kids and not get married, live the life of a seventeen year old with no job ? No

Instead they say, o great he’s cute. I’ll take care of the birth control and if it fails, as it does occasionally, I’ll have an abortion.

Then there’s sex within a healthy marriage which welcomes life and there’s no birth control, no ‘I like you but not THAT much, kids are okay but not THAT great’ and abortion has nothing to do with that nor does birth control

Then there’s natural family planning, which when done correctly, enables the woman to know just what is going on, something that is always discouraged in medicine and in society, and which is 98% effective. More effective than the pill. The couple has to be married to use it and there is no room for abortion. Couples who use it have a 1% divorce rate versus the sky high general divorce rate


54 posted on 09/28/2014 12:47:38 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: stanne

You’re making an unsupportable leap of logic. Does a failure of the rhythm method lead to abortion? If not how can you claim that a conddom failure leads to abortion. You need to brush up on your logic.


55 posted on 09/28/2014 5:58:45 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fictional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: stanne

You’ve made an irrational extravagant claim. The burden of proof is squarely on your shoulders. Still a bit fuzzy on that logic thing aren’t you.


56 posted on 09/28/2014 6:00:11 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (When I first read it, " Atlas Shrugged" was fictional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Shades of Peter Singer.


57 posted on 09/28/2014 6:45:37 PM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Fuzzy ? No. The theologians think this way. Educate yourself. Read humane vitae


58 posted on 09/28/2014 6:47:31 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods

Brush up ? No

People who are ignorant always claim natural family planning is rhythm. They know nothing about either one

Anyone who is invested in natural family planning is doing do in order to either have children or to not, and, if not, under the guidance of a caring individual. Likely a priest

No one goes to NFP class unmarried. They know that intercourse was created by God for procreation They’re not animals The procedure itself is a commitment. No one unwilling to commit to a spouse or potential spouse goes to this class

Any child conceived in the 2% chance that is the case, is welcomed into a marriage


59 posted on 09/28/2014 7:32:38 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: stanne
Please, and very very simply, prove your point, and also tell us how We, in this time, from 50 years ago, are so correct, in our sudden dependence on the pharmaceutical industry for the first time in human history, that we are the only ones since the year 3500 BC who separate sex form birth, and marriage from sex?

Your observation that "we are the only ones since the year 3500 BC who separate sex form birth, and marriage from sex" strikes me as, well, not entirely accurate. Perhaps the more precise term for it would be disingenuous.

Do you really imagine that those of the current generation "are the only ones since the year 3500 BC" to have sexual relations outside of marriage? Or to have sexual relations for reasons other than a desire to reproduce?

60 posted on 09/28/2014 10:31:03 PM PDT by AmericanExceptionalist (Democrats believe in discussing the full spectrum of ideas, all the way from far left to center-left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson