[Sans-Culotte]

So, even though the autopsy showed he was shot from the front, these “witnesses” saw him shot from behind.

[Norm Lenhart]

White devil bullets. They went by him, turned, and hit him in the front.

[Vigilanteman]

Yeah, who are you supposed to believe? The facts and your own lying eyes? Or the media narrative?

[Carl Vehse]

So, even though the autopsy showed he was shot from the front, these “witnesses” saw him shot from behind.

The bullet holes are lying?!?

[Scrambler Bob]

shot from the front, these “witnesses” saw him shot from behind. —

Officer was a real bad shot, missed, and bullet traveled around the globe, hitting Brown from behind.

Normally unlikely physics were enabled by Global Warming.

[Paradox]

So, even though the autopsy showed he was shot from the front, these “witnesses” saw him shot from behind..

Ok, a peeve here. It is ENTIRELY possible that the police officer did indeed fire at Brown while he was running away. The autopsy results do not contradict this. The only thing the autopsy results show is that brown was HIT from the front. Shots to the back might not have hit their mark.

Sorry to vent here, just bothers me to see things like this posted when there are obvious potential explanations.

[greeneyes]

Well, if they saw him shot from behind, it matters not whether his hands were in the air. Obviously he was still fleeing, not surrendering, since he didn’t turn around. That’s resisting arrest, after assaulting an officer among other things.

[trebb]

So, even though the autopsy showed he was shot from the front, these “witnesses” saw him shot from behind.

And the rounds in his arm didn't enter from a frontal, hands-up perspective - would be really good shooting to put 4 rounds in the raised arm of a retreating suspect...