Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/12/2014 6:42:11 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: george76

Same reason Nixon should not have debated Kennedy on TV.

Looks.


2 posted on 09/12/2014 6:44:31 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (DC, it's Versailles on the Potomac but without the food and culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Every Udall ad I’ve seen in the several months has been his opponent is a woman hating mysogonist who opposes all abortion. He has no positives to stand on, he was the passing vote on Obamacare, he voted for the stimulus, he rubber stamped the entire Obama agenda, he opposed fracking in the state. It would be a very short odd debate if every single answer, is “my opponent hates women.”


3 posted on 09/12/2014 6:50:23 AM PDT by McCloud-Strife ( USA 1776-2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

does Udall have a big lead?

It only makes sense if you have a good-sized lead


4 posted on 09/12/2014 7:02:34 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Sort of like asking why crocs don’t chase things on the open terrain. Their forte is hide and spring, darting away before receiving damage. Libs do the same thing, hide behind various facades, lying about everything, looking like a regular human beings. Suddenly, they unmask and attack liberty and freedom, until the next election cycle, when they submerge and go into pretend mode once again.


6 posted on 09/12/2014 8:26:43 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson