Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ray Rice: Are the Ravens Justified in Releasing Him?
September 9, 2014 | This Just In

Posted on 09/09/2014 11:09:33 PM PDT by This Just In

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: This Just In

Yep! Its their team they can have on it who they want...


61 posted on 09/10/2014 6:20:09 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Hi TwelveOfTwenty,

If you read my initial thread followed by the dialog carefully in context you’ll clearly see what I am referring to.


62 posted on 09/10/2014 11:51:10 AM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Yes. It’s a business, and as long as there was no public furor, a two-game suspension for a key member of their team was fine by the organization, until it was swept under the rug. Once Rice became a massive liability due to public outcry, they decided to accept losing more games as opposed to the negative PR.

It’s just business.

Ray Lewis was implicated in ****ing MURDER, for crying out loud, but because there was never any direct evidence made public, he got to finish a career and retire as a “beloved hero”.


63 posted on 09/10/2014 11:58:52 AM PDT by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
I did read your initial post, and I agree with your assessment on Rice's actions, which is that it clearly wasn't self defense.

However, the statement that I replied to, "Furthermore, no man is justified in striking a woman unless his life is in immediate danger.", clearly expands the context to involve self defense where the man's life may not be in danger.

64 posted on 09/10/2014 3:08:52 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

The quote you cited was in response to a comment by another Freeper.


65 posted on 09/10/2014 3:33:27 PM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

And how does that change the meaning from how I interpreted it?


66 posted on 09/10/2014 4:18:42 PM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Yes.


67 posted on 09/10/2014 4:26:06 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

Release? Why isn’t he in jail or out on bail?


68 posted on 09/10/2014 4:30:04 PM PDT by Principle Over Politics ("Man is not free unless government is limited" Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: This Just In
If a white man says, “nappy headed ho” on the radio, he loses his job; if a black man beats one down in an elevator, he gets a 2 game suspension.
69 posted on 09/10/2014 4:33:51 PM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TwelveOfTwenty

Your interpretation, or more accurately, your false interpretation makes all the difference in the world. You failed to read the conversation in context.

My fellow freeper and I were discussing the fact that there is NO justifiable reason for a man to strike a woman unless his life is in clear and present danger. If - by performing some defensive maneuver involving physical contact - he is able to remove the immediate threat, his actions are justifiable. Otherwise, there is no legitimate reason for his actions. We have a Constitutional right to protect our person when our very life is in danger.


70 posted on 09/10/2014 8:36:22 PM PDT by This Just In
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: This Just In

OK, I’ll buy that.


71 posted on 09/11/2014 3:19:05 AM PDT by TwelveOfTwenty (See my home page for some of my answers to the left's talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson