Nebraska high court hears Keystone case
Feds pay $105M to turn garbage, feces into fuel
Global Warming on Free Republic
Al Gore flying around in a private jet causes global warming.
Leni
Yet my wife’s Turkey Burgers still somehow manage escape these Sherlocks?
Maybe. Who knows? Anything that was once living and dies produces methane. Decaying plants and microorganisms produce over 99% of the world's methane. On this scale, cow farts don't even register.
Just gets more and more ridiculous
Do we have to even guess that the researchers are vegan or not???
Would be interesting to know who funded this study, how much does it cost to buy a lie.
Has anyone ever considered the emission of buffalo. They used to roam the vast ranges of this country that are now farmed or used for raising cattle. How did the world not fry from the millions of buffalo that used to roam America?
And the Hindu head of the commission who condemned eating beef will probably NOT be the head of the movement to reduce global warming by demanding that cattle, as a species be eradicated from the planet to save it from global warming. That is an action that must happen if cattle are such a threat, and will be justified by the same/similar reasons that the folks who say humanity must be eradicated are using.
And while we are on the topic of bovine farting, what about the farting of other grass eaters that the ‘save the animals’ folks are campaigning for such as elephants, they must produce a lot of methane because of their size, it is just that there is not a market the meat, just the ivory tusks. And after that horses, donkeys, mules, and eventually all of the herbivores, we need to get rid of them to eliminate the methane they produce.
Here is an idea. We can have a debate between AlBore and the perfesser to see which is responsible for a phenomenon that doesn’t exist! That would be fun.
I say lets solve this problem by eating the cows.
Ohay then!
And BTW, there is no such thing as "the science of global warming." It's simply an invented and flawed theory.
Though as Christopher Booker pointed out: “As vegetarian Hindu, Pachauri said nothing about the contribution to global warming made by India's 400 million sacred cows.” (245)
This beyond hysterical. The guy was a freaking railroad engineer and economist. I suppose the two are closely linked!.
I guess next year he'll be studying astronomy.
Nebraska high court hears Keystone case
Feds pay $105M to turn garbage, feces into fuel
Global Warming on Free Republic
I’m betting these knuckleheads want to actually CONTROL what you eat, too.
Carbon Cult Nanny State PING!
Look, if people really wanted to show by action, that they both believed and were concerned about a global climate change, they...
1) Would push to end subsidization of gasoline, diesel fuel, and petroleum products, why, because a higher price would encourage people to use less gas
2) Would push against heavy subsidization of water. If water prices were allowed to rise much higher, then there would be an immediate incentive to not congregate into arid parts of the country where water is more scarce. If you were in arid places, use less water because of the higher costs, unless you were super rich, but even then, there would be a need to trim the Las Vegas fountains and pools, because the water for said uses would be more expensive. Or possibly put pools and fountains indoors to get less evaporation.
3) Would push for heavy immigration control. Massive foot and vehicular traffic across the border is damaging to the desert vegetation, and loads of undocumented residents must cost resources (think water) as well. And yet the politicians with a straight face say that we should have fewer babies and depopulate. It’s like having a bottle of water with two lids, one pouring and saying that it’s okay, because we one lid on.
Either way, my point is that the way that politicians handle the economy creates incentives against their own preaching, if supply and demand had a more true effect, there would be more reason to conserve one’s resources, or possibly even make neccessary tech reforms to improve the situation. But instead, they subsidize, which creates an illusion of how available certain resources really are.
And this is why they love this fraud of globull warming.. because anything they dont like “Causes it”
More behavior control.
Wonder when people will wake up to this BS? Hey they believed the second hand smoke myth, so anything is possible lol