Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Meltdown [The Most Incisive Analysis of The Obama Presidency!]
Commentary Magazine ^ | September 01, 2014 | Bret Stephens

Posted on 08/30/2014 9:39:36 AM PDT by Steelfish

The Meltdown 09.01.14 Bret Stephens

In July, after Germany trounced Brazil 7–1 in the semifinal match of the World Cup—including a first-half stretch in which the Brazilian soccer squad gave up an astonishing five goals in 19 minutes—a sports commentator wrote: “This was not a team losing. It was a dream dying.” These words could equally describe what has become of Barack Obama’s foreign policy since his second inauguration. The president, according to the infatuated view of his political aides and media flatterers, was supposed to be playing o jogo bonito, the beautiful game—ending wars, pressing resets, pursuing pivots, and restoring America’s good name abroad.

Instead, he crumbled.

As I write, the foreign policy of the United States is in a state of unprecedented disarray. In some cases, failed policy has given way to an absence of policy. So it is in Libya, Syria, Egypt, Iraq, and, at least until recently, Ukraine. In other cases the president has doubled down on failed policy—extending nuclear negotiations with Iran; announcing the full withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan.

(Excerpt) Read more at commentarymagazine.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: obama; obamaforeignpolicy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: GreenHornet

You make some good points but I believe it’s possible he will be made a martyr. He’s out of control and more of a detriment than an asset to the ‘powers that be’ agenda.


21 posted on 08/30/2014 10:14:12 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: carriage_hill

Politicians and lawyers. Never make anything simple. Never make anything honest. Always put in a loophole.


22 posted on 08/30/2014 10:17:39 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
Can't argue with that.....and hate saying, because I am a woman, that women have done far more harm then good in leadership overall....they do not understand that men's minds work differently and are seen as “protectors’..where women are “appeasers”. I see few tough women out there who can see the world as it needs to be seen rather then how they want to see it.
23 posted on 08/30/2014 10:18:33 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Aria

Yeah, I stopped reading at his obligatory slam of Sarah Palin, who has more brains in her mucklucks than Barry has altogether.


24 posted on 08/30/2014 10:19:01 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian
Afghan will be the next caliphate country

ISIS might try and claim that, but if you read their history over the last couple hundred years, NOBODY outside Afghan is really ever gonna run that place.

You might enjoy this: http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Man_Who_Would_Be_King.html?id=R2Q51iIenvEC

25 posted on 08/30/2014 10:23:45 AM PDT by nascarnation (Toxic Baraq Syndrome: hopefully infecting a Dem candidate near you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Astute article, so well written I read to the end..

Brief, pithy quote from very long article:

the failure of Obama’s foreign policy is not, ultimately, a reflection of his character or IQ. It is the consequence of an ideology…. That ideology is what now goes by the name of progressivism, which has effectively been the dominant (if often disavowed) view of the Democratic Party since George McGovern ran on a “Come Home, America” platform in 1972—and got 37.5 percent of the popular vote. Progressivism believes that the United States must lead internationally by example (especially when it comes to nuclear-arms control); that the U.S. is as much the sinner as it is the sinned against when it comes to our adversaries (remember Mosaddegh?); and that the American interest is best served when it is merged with, or subsumed by, the global interest (ideally in the form of a UN resolution).

………………

Above all, progressivism believes that the United States is a country that, in nearly every respect, treads too heavily on the Earth: environmentally, ideologically, militarily, and geopolitically. The goal, therefore, is to reduce America’s footprint; to “retrench,” as the administration would like to think of it, or to retreat, as it might more accurately be called.

The author of the piece has a book coming out that sounds like a good one: America in Retreat: The New Isolationism and the Coming Global Disorder. It will be published by Sentinel in November.

26 posted on 08/30/2014 10:23:56 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

+1.


27 posted on 08/30/2014 10:29:07 AM PDT by Carriage Hill ( Some days you're the windshield, and some days you're the bug.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

Agree. Unfortunately its only a fractional small minority who are literate today in the real sense to read and comprehend what Bret is writing about. Most cannot name who the vice-president is, or the speaker of the House, or the Chief Justice or would know in what continent some major countries are located in. These are the empty vessels who absorb the “hope and change” rhetoric and have been given the right to vote. Many of them are illegals or Somalians who cannot read or write English.


28 posted on 08/30/2014 10:31:43 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

They’re running it from Pakistan now.

Easy to envision ISIS Taliban alliance or ISIS takeover of Kabul.

If we don’t decimate ISIS they are far from finished.


29 posted on 08/30/2014 10:32:33 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
Whatever happened to all that pre-election talk about "Hope and Change"? The media was absolutely gushing over this guy who by all accounts never worked an actual job and wouldn't be hired by Dairy Queen to run an ice cream stand because he wasn't qualified. Yet he was supposed to "learn" on the job.

The training wheels never came off.


30 posted on 08/30/2014 10:32:44 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian
Afghan will be the next caliphate country

It won't even take a battle, and no other country will be willing to fight there again. Question....what's to keep the Caliphate from spreading into Pakistan?

31 posted on 08/30/2014 10:35:07 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
This article sums up the current state of affairs as well as I ever could.

Please note the author's emphasis on ideology as the root of Obama's problem rather than detachment or some other psycho babble


32 posted on 08/30/2014 10:35:51 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish
The author writes like this is all a complete surprise. It was an obvious outcome by the summer of 2008.

And even though he is obviously incapable or unwilling to undertake competent action, his party and press apparatus will never openly admit it.

If he could run for a third term, he would win, both because this nation is too clueless to objectively evaluate him but also because he is likely to face an opponent whose chief attribute is losing gracefully.

33 posted on 08/30/2014 10:36:31 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

My wife pretty much summed up Obama when she said “Obama is a pussy.”


34 posted on 08/30/2014 10:38:46 AM PDT by ops33 (Senior Master Sergeant, USAF (Retired))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

easier than waiting for nukes from Iran.


35 posted on 08/30/2014 10:40:07 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: caww
woman have done far more harm than good in leadership overall

I agree. The supposedly conservative women in the US Senate and Goevernorships seem to have no commitment whatsoever to the conservative principles they campaigned on.

I'm thinking that I'd like to see how woman who were officers in the military do in these leadership roles. But even with them, I'd never go with a woman for Pres or VP who's conviction, resolve, independent thought, and effective leadership haven't been tested.

36 posted on 08/30/2014 10:41:03 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

side bar

sharia4belgium

http://www.cbn.com/tv/embedplayer.aspx?bcid=1509282970001


37 posted on 08/30/2014 10:41:28 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DariusBane

This feels like 1913.
**********
Yep. (Bible refers to) every generation must face the sword. The world has been mostly quiet since the Cold War ended.

Enjoy this lull why you can;once all hell breaks loose it won’t stop for several years.imo


38 posted on 08/30/2014 10:47:41 AM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Veto!; Steelfish
"Astute article"

No, it is just NeoCon bullcorn.

It was just a few weeks ago they were swarming the TV wanting to re-invade Iraq. Bill Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz, Dick Cheney, Paul Bremmer, John Bolton, etc.

They want to spend 2 trillion more, kill and maim even more servicemen, so we can prop up a corrupt govt.

The NeoCons have never been right about anything.

You need to put up your best NeoCon for prez in 2016. Who will it be? John McCain? Lindsey Graham? Dick Cheney? Mitt Romney?

39 posted on 08/30/2014 10:51:40 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Pritchett
Does anyone really think Hillary can fix this in two years?!?!?

Hillary quit 2 years ago, which was step 1. Step 2: urban media stops covering up Barky's incompetence, then lets his meltdown jell in public opinion. Step 3: nonchalantly point out that Hillary was the magic of his first term. Step 4: America gets a second homosexual socialist president for the next 8 years.

40 posted on 08/30/2014 10:52:24 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson