Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/28/2014 4:59:07 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Patton@Bastogne

He did not help his cause when he suggested we had to move past Reagan.


2 posted on 08/28/2014 5:00:09 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("If you're litigating against nuns, you've probably done something wrong."-Ted Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Reagan would send over 200 Marines to a hotel as peacekeepers and then maybe give a speech about their deaths.


4 posted on 08/28/2014 5:06:03 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patton@Bastogne

You know Romney isn’t running, right?

Strawmen are pointless on our side and downright pathetic ehrn they have no meaningful context.


10 posted on 08/28/2014 5:25:12 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (AGW "Scientific method:" Draw your lines first, then plot your points)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patton@Bastogne
People who accuse me of being a "purist" who wouldn't have been satisfied by ANYBODY because I refused to vote for Romney in 2012, fail to understand that I'd have gladly voted for Newt, and he is FAR from perfect.

I hope he has the grace and good sense for the 2016 presidential race to adopt Reagan's wisdom and drop caring who gets the credit (Reagan's little slogan in his office, "You can accomplish anything if you don't care who gets the credit"). I pray Gingrich puts his talents to better use, because they are needed. I'll bet a lot of people here have zero clue as to the great methodical approach and philosophy he put forth during the last primary for reducing the scope of government in education. One's heart thrilled to read it.

But we need ... to break away from the Republican party, Patton, I'm sorry to say that I am really thinking that for the presidential at least it will be necessary. The Republican party is truly a party for idiots, when that party asks its members to vote for a representative who fully embraces the same government model as the opposition party.

People understand and resent that they're being offered a shallow choice between More Government Crap 1 (Democrat), or More Government Crap 2 (Republican). People know that they want less government and more freedom, and that neither party offers it.

We need a Second Party, at least for the presidential race, and Gingrich would do his best work if he helped make it happen with the right candidate, whoever it is, but it's not Newt. I hope he graciously applies his efforts elsewhere to achieving the same goal: of helping limited government representation find its way into American government.

11 posted on 08/28/2014 5:26:06 PM PDT by Finny (Thy word is a lamp unto my feet, and a light unto my path. -- Psalm 119:105)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patton@Bastogne

Ronald Reagan would do the exact opposite of Barack Obama.


13 posted on 08/28/2014 5:40:06 PM PDT by Slyfox (Satan's goal is to rub out the image of God he sees in the face of every human.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Patton@Bastogne

I love Ronald Reagan as much as the next conservative. He is one of my heroes. But he was president 30 years ago. I love listening to his and Margaret Thatcher’s speeches. But I know when I do it that I am indulging in nostalgia. “What would Reagan do” is a bit of a fantasy. We have to figure out what we should do now, based on the people we have leading us now.


16 posted on 08/28/2014 5:59:50 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson